RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Telestroke uses videoconferencing technology to allow off-site experts to provide stroke thrombolysis decision support to less experienced front line clinicians. AIM: To assess the impact of a new telestroke service on thrombolysis rates and door-to-needle times in participating provincial hospitals and service resources to aid transition to a sustainable telestroke service. METHODS: This is a sequential comparison of 'pre' (December 2015 to May 2016) and 'post' (June 2016 to December 2016) implementation outcomes. The main outcomes were thrombolysis rate and door-to-needle time. All patient data were captured prospectively in a central database. Data captured and analysed also included technical problems, consumer and clinician feedback, and additional service resources required. RESULTS: Over the study period, 164 telestroke assessments were completed, including the 'hub' hospital. Among the participating provincial hospitals, 21 of 343 patients (6.1%) were thrombolysed in the 6-months prior to June 2016 and 50 of 318 patients (15.7%) during the 6-month following implementation of telestroke; odds ratio 2.86 (95% confidence interval 1.68-4.89); P = 0.0001. Overall, mean (standard deviation) regional hospital door-to-needle time reduced from 79.6 (31.4) to 62.7 (23.3) min (P = 0.015). Videoconferencing failure occurred in 4.8% of cases. Consumer and clinician feedback was positive. The main resource challenge was doubling of out-of-hours neurologist workload. CONCLUSION: Telestroke was associated with a significant increase in thrombolysis rate and reduction in door-to-needle time in provincial hospitals indicating improved patient care. Quantification of the extra neurologist workload allowed for a seamless transition to 'business as usual' using a novel annual subscription funding and service model.
