Phenotyping to Target Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrom (OSAS) in adults patients with severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) and severe asthma are frequently associated. This article focuses on the relationship between severe asthma phenotypes and OSAS. METHODS: FASE-CPHG was an observational, cross-sectional, prospective, multicentric study conducted in 104 non-academic hospitals from May-16 to July-17. 1465 patients with severe asthma were analysed and 1424 patients phenotyped. Clusters were compared for OSAS presence; independent factors associated with OSAS were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: 11% of patients with severe asthma reported OSAS. OSAS incidence differed according to asthma phenotypes. 98% of OSAS patients belonged to the "obese asthma" cluster, and none to the "early onset allergic asthma" cluster. Independent factors associated with OSAS were obesity (OR=5.782 [3.927-8.512]), male gender (OR=3.047 [2.059-4.510]), high blood pressure (OR=2.875 [1.978-4.181]), depression (OR=2.552 [1.607-4.050]), late-onset asthma (OR=1.789 [1.167-2.743]) and atopy (OR=0.622 [0.408-0.948]). Moreover, OSAS patients were more frequently treated with long-term oral corticosteroids (30% vs 15%, p < 0.0001), that may contribute to the high prevalence of obesity in this group of patients. They were more frequently uncontrolled (78% vs 69%, p = 0.03) and they engaged in low level physical activity (vs 80% vs 68% p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study gives an innovative insight into OSAS associated with severe asthma. Most of patients with OSAS belonged to the cluster "obese asthma" and none to the cluster "early onset allergic asthma". In addition to male gender, arterial hypertension and depression, obese asthma, late onset asthma and non-atopic status were identified as specific risk factors. Oral corticosteroids seems to play a deleterious role. Phenotyping asthma can help physicians target severe asthmatic patients with OSAS and may avoid unnecessary examinations.

FASE-CPHG study: a panoramic snapshot of difficult-to-treat, severe asthma in French nonacademic hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data describing management of patients with severe asthma are limited. To address this issue, we conducted FASE-CPHG (France Asthme Sevère - Collège des Pneumologues des Hôpitaux Généraux), a descriptive, multicentric, and observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: French pulmonologists from nonacademic hospitals completed questionnaires on patient characteristics and ongoing asthma treatment for severe asthmatic patients observed during the inclusion period. In addition, we collected data from patients via self-assessment questionnaires. FINDINGS: 104 physicians recruited 1502 patients within 1 year. The mean age of the 1465 patients analysed was 54.4±16.1 years. Severe asthmatic patients were more frequently female (63%), with a history of atopy (65%). Most patients remained poorly controlled or uncontrolled, with an important difference between physicians' opinion and the Global Initiative for Asthma criteria (63% versus 96%). The most common comorbidities included ear, nose and throat diseases (59% of cases); anxiety (40%); and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (39%). Allergic sensitisation tests and/or blood eosinophil count evaluation, and spirometry were performed in 92% and 98% of patients, respectively. The mean eosinophil count and total serum IgE were 437 cells·mm-3 and 546 UI·L-1, respectively. In addition to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting ß2-agonists, patients were receiving leukotriene receptor antagonists (52%), anticholinergic drugs (34%), anti IgE (27%) and oral corticosteroids (17%); 65% adhered to their treatment. INTERPRETATION: This study provides insight into the characteristics and management of severe asthma in France and may help improve knowledge on this pathology, which represents a high burden to healthcare.

Rituximab maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy compared to the relapse risk and tolerance of systematic rituximab (RTX) infusions as maintenance therapy for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), who entered remission taking conventional immunosuppressants or RTX. METHODS: A retrospective study of the main clinical characteristics, outcomes, and RTX tolerance of patients who had received ≥ 2 RTX maintenance infusions in our center, regardless of induction regimen, between 2003 and 2010. RESULTS: We identified 28 patients [4 MPA and 24 GPA; median age 55.5 yrs (range 18-78); 17 (60%) males] who received a median of 4 (range 2-10) RTX maintenance infusions, with median followup of 38 months (range 21-97) since diagnosis or last flare. None experienced a RTX infusion-related adverse event; 15 patients (among the 21 with available data) had hypogammaglobulinemia (predominantly IgM) prior to their last RTX maintenance infusion; 3 had infectious events (1 cutaneous abscess, 1 otitis, 1 fatal H1N1 flu). Two patients suffered pulmonary relapses shortly before a planned RTX maintenance infusion (both had increased antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody levels and 1 had CD19+ lymphocyte reconstitution). CONCLUSION: Rituximab maintenance therapy was well tolerated but did not completely prevent relapses and persistent "grumbling" disease. These preliminary results remain to be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial currently in progress.