Characterisation of data resources for in silico modelling: benchmark datasets for ADME properties.

INTRODUCTION: The cost of in vivo and in vitro screening of ADME properties of compounds has motivated efforts to develop a range of in silico models. At the heart of the development of any computational model are the data; high quality data are essential for developing robust and accurate models. The characteristics of a dataset, such as its availability, size, format and type of chemical identifiers used, influence the modelability of the data. Areas covered: This review explores the usefulness of publicly available ADME datasets for researchers to use in the development of predictive models. More than 140 ADME datasets were collated from publicly available resources and the modelability of 31 selected datasets were assessed using specific criteria derived in this study. Expert opinion: Publicly available datasets differ significantly in information content and presentation. From a modelling perspective, datasets should be of adequate size, available in a user-friendly format with all chemical structures associated with one or more chemical identifiers suitable for automated processing (e.g. CAS number, SMILES string or InChIKey). Recommendations for assessing dataset suitability for modelling and publishing data in an appropriate format are discussed.

Mechanism-Based QSAR Modeling of Skin Sensitization.

Many chemicals can induce skin sensitization, and there is a pressing need for non-animal methods to give a quantitative indication of potency. Using two large published data sets of skin sensitizers, we have allocated each sensitizing chemical to one of 10 mechanistic categories and then developed good QSAR models for the seven categories that have a sufficient number of chemicals to allow modeling. Both internal and external validation checks showed that each model had good predictivity.

Hepatotoxicity: a scheme for generating chemical categories for read-across, structural alerts and insights into mechanism(s) of action.

The ability of a compound to cause adverse effects to the liver is one of the most common reasons for drug development failures and the withdrawal of drugs from the market. Such adverse effects can vary tremendously in severity, leading to an array of possible drug-induced liver injuries (DILIs). As a result, it is not surprising that drug development has evolved into a complex and multifaceted process including methods aiming to identify potential liver toxicities. Unfortunately, hepatotoxicity remains one of the most complex and poorly understood areas of human toxicity; thus it is a significant challenge to identify potential hepatotoxins. The performance of existing methods to identify hepatotoxicity requires improvement. The current study details a scheme for generating chemical categories and the development of structural alerts able to identify potential hepatotoxins. The study utilized a diverse 951-compound dataset and used structural similarity methods to produce a number of structurally restricted categories. From these categories, 16 structural alerts associated with observed human hepatotoxicity were developed. Furthermore, the mechanism(s) by which these compounds cause hepatotoxicity were investigated and a mechanistic rationale was proposed, where possible, to yield mechanistically supported structural alerts. Alerts of this nature have the potential to be used in the screening of compounds to highlight potential hepatotoxicity, whilst the chemical categories themselves are important in applying read-across approaches. The scheme presented in this study also has the potential to act as a knowledge generator serving as an excellent starting platform from which to conduct additional toxicological studies.

Assessing toxicological data quality: basic principles, existing schemes and current limitations.

Existing toxicological data may be used for a variety of purposes such as hazard and risk assessment or toxicity prediction. The potential use of such data is, in part, dependent upon their quality. Consideration of data quality is of key importance with respect to the application of chemicals legislation such as REACH. Whether data are being used to make regulatory decisions or build computational models, the quality of the output is reflected by the quality of the data employed. Therefore, the need to assess data quality is an important requirement for making a decision or prediction with an appropriate level of confidence. This study considers the biological and chemical factors that may impact upon toxicological data quality and discusses the assessment of data quality. Four general quality criteria are introduced and existing data quality assessment schemes are discussed. Two case study datasets of skin sensitization data are assessed for quality providing a comparison of existing assessment methods. This study also discusses the limitations and difficulties encountered during quality assessment, including the use of differing quality schemes and the global versus chemical-specific assessments of quality. Finally, a number of recommendations are made to aid future data quality assessments.