Randomized comparison of 1-hour topical method vs. amoxycillin plus omeprazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients.

BACKGROUND: A novel 1-h topical method eradicated Helicobacter pylori in 96% of dyspeptic patients. The eradication rate of amoxycillin/omeprazole therapy varies from 0 to 93%. AIM: To compare both methods in patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer. METHODS: Eighty patients (59 males, 21 females; median age 43 years) were randomized into two therapeutic groups. The first group (group A) was treated with a 6-week course of ranitidine 300 mg/day, then omeprazole 20 mg b.d. with pronase 36000 units/day for 2 days, followed by 1-h topical therapy with a solution of bismuth, metronidazole, amoxycillin and pronase. The second group (group B) consisted of patients treated with omeprazole 20 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 2 g/day for 2 weeks, followed by a 4-week course of ranitidine 300 mg/day. Eradication of H. pylori was assessed by urease test, histology, a polymerase chain reaction and a 13C-urea breath test, all of which were performed 4 weeks after discontinuation of the antibacterial treatment. RESULTS: Eradication rates in groups A and B were 2.5% and 35% in an intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. Side-effects were encountered in 40.5% and 12.5% of subjects in groups A and B, respectively. Treatment tolerance was rated as poor by 54% of patients in group A and 2.5% of patients in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment regimens, the 1-h topical method and amoxycillin with omeprazole, have low eradication rates in patients with duodenal ulcer. In addition, the topical treatment is characterized by a high rate of side-effects and poor tolerance. Based on the results of our study, neither method can be recommended for eradication of H. pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer.

Ornithine decarboxylase as a marker for premalignancy in the stomach.

Assessment of mucosal ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity in the human large bowel may be of value as a marker of potential malignant risk. Its value as a marker of premalignancy in the upper gastrointestinal tract is less clear. Using a [14C]-ornithine bioassay, gastric mucosal ODC activity was measured in 32 normal subjects and 22 patients with confirmed gastric cancer. These results were compared with 47 patients at increased risk of upper gastrointestinal malignancy, (32 patients with partial gastric resection, 15 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis). Median ODC activity in normal subjects was 371 pmol/mg protein/h, (interquartile range (IQR), 230-617). There was no variation with age or sex and no relation to Helicobacter pylori status. Normal subjects had significantly lower ODC activity than patients with a gastric resection or confirmed gastric cancer, but similar to patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Furthermore, no difference in activity was identified between patients with a gastric resection and established gastric cancer. ODC activity was, however, significantly increased in areas of gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia, regardless of the clinical group from which the samples were obtained. It is concluded that measurement of mucosal ODC activity does not provide additional predictive information of malignant risk in the stomach and investigation of other potential biomarkers of malignancy is warranted.