Impact of surgically placed radiopaque markers during aortic root surgery on facilitating secondary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of radiopaque markers during aortic root surgery might possibly facilitate upcoming coronary angiography or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Aim of this study was to report the impact of surgically placed radiopaque markers on procedural characteristics and on angiographic outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed baseline characteristics, preoperative and postoperative data as well as procedural findings. In addition, a subgroup analysis of all patients who underwent coronary angiography after aortic root surgery was performed to report radiation time and contrast media used. RESULTS: A total of 469 patients underwent aortic root surgery between January 2008 and April 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: group w/ markers (n = 182) and group w/o markers (n = 287). A propensity score matching was performed resulting in a total of 28 patients w/ markers and 28 patients w/o markers. Aortic cross-clamp time did not differ statistically significantly between the group w/o markers and the group w/ markers (124.0 [96.0-150.0] versus 123.0 [110.0-149.0] min, p = 0.09). There was no increased probability for requirement of postoperative angiography in the group w/o markers compared to the group w/ markers (11.8% versus 15.4%, p = 0.27). There was no statistically significant difference in the radiation time 5.5 [3-6.5] versus 5 [2.5-7.5] min, p = 0.62) nor in the amount of contrast media used (85 [77.5-100] versus 80 [60-90] ml, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Surgically placed radiopaque markers during aortic root surgery do not increase operative risk and have the potential for facilitating secondary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

The Hemodynamic Performance of the Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve in a Propensity-Matched Comparison to the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and Perimount Magna Ease Valves for Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The Perceval valve was shown to facilitate minimal-invasive operations and shorten operative times. We aimed to compare the early results of the Perceval valve to those of well-established valves, namely the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and Perimount Magna Ease valve protheses, in terms of their clinical and hemodynamic performances. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. For every patient operated with a Perceval valve, the last patient before and the next following patient receiving a Perimount valve was included in a control group leading to a 2:1 ratio (Perimount:Perceval). A propensity score matching was used and a subgroup analysis was performed to compare early and late Perceval patients as the sizing technique was changed over time. RESULTS: From November 2013 to November 2017, 423 patients were identified. These included 141 consecutive patients receiving a Perceval valve through a full- or a hemi-sternotomy. In addition, 282 patients receiving a Perimount or a Magna Ease valve were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 127 matched patients were compared. Operating times were shorter and postoperative transvalvular pressure gradients were lower in the Perceval group (15 vs. 17 mmHg, p = 0.002). There was no difference in mortality and stroke rates. The incidence of new pacemaker implantations was higher in the Perceval group (7.1 vs. 18.9%, p = 0.005), mainly due to a very high incidence in the early phase of our Perceval experience prior to a change in the Perceval implantation technique. Subgroup analysis showed significantly better results in the late Perceval group. CONCLUSION: Surgical outcome was good in both groups. The Perceval valve exhibited lower postoperative gradients, and the need for pacemaker implantation was higher and can be reduced by avoiding oversizing.

Development of a Novel Adapter to Enable Less-Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation via the Left Ventricular Apex.

The first prototype of an adapter to enable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation solely via the left ventricular (LV) apex and without requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was tested in healthy and acutely failing pig hearts. The adapter consists of a fixation, blood guiding, and connecting module fitting to a HeartMate 3 (HM3; Abbott, Chicago, IL) pump. Implantation was performed via a left thoracotomy in five pigs (96 ± 18 kg). Invasive blood pressure was measured before (CTRL), 30 minutes after HM3 initiation (HM3_CTRL), during acute heart failure (HF) induced by rapid pacing (CTRL_HF), and 5 minutes after initiating HM3 support (HM3_HF). To further estimate the LVAD performance, blood pressure amplitudes were calculated in the healthy heart without (CTRL) and with HM3 support (HM3_CTRL) as: systolic-diastolic blood pressure. Our adapter implantation and connection to the HM3 pump succeeded in all animals. Compared to the normal beating healthy heart, blood pressure amplitudes were significantly smaller during HM3 support (CTRL: 41 ± 5 mm Hg vs. HM3_CTRL: 20 ± 4 mm Hg; p < 0.05). Under HF conditions, mean blood pressure returned to normal values after pump initiation (CTRL_HF: 29 ± 6 mm Hg, HM3_HF: 83 ± 24 mm Hg). The adapter prototype allowed safe, straightforward, and less-invasive LVAD implantation solely via the LV apex without using CPB and support of the LV during acute HF in the pig heart.

Recannulation of the right axillary artery in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery is safe.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of recannulating the axillary artery in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2020, we evaluated patients who underwent reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery. The patients were divided into 2 groups: (i) patients with no previous right axillary artery cannulation (primary cannulation group) and (ii) patients with a previous cannulated right axillary artery (recannulation group). We analysed the intraoperative data, cannulation-related complications, postoperative outcomes and compared the 2 groups (primary cannulation versus recannulation). RESULTS: The patient (n = 132) baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference in regard to the duration of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp and antegrade cerebral perfusion time nor in regard to the total number of patients with cannulation-related complications between the 2 groups [n = 8 (8.0%) vs n = 1 (3.1%), P = 0.34]. The incidence of iatrogenic axillary artery dissection, iatrogenic aortic dissection, iatrogenic aortic dissection leading to death, axillary artery thrombosis, need for surgical repair, brachial plexus injury rates, malperfusion, high perfusion resistance and hyperperfusion syndrome revealed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). There were 11 (11.0%) cases of stroke in the primary cannulation group and 1 (3.1%) in the recannulation group (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Recannulation of the right axillary artery in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery is not associated with worse clinical outcomes and can be safely and effectively performed, also representing a preventive and rescue measure. Previous cannulation of the axillary artery should not hinder the decision for recannulation.

Recurrent Cardiac Constriction after Implantation of an Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Surgical Membrane.

One of the challenges compounding the complexity of reoperative cardiac surgery is the surgical adhesion, which can be responsible for adverse intraoperative events. Implantation of a substitute neo-pericardium has become a frequently used solution, with currently rising numbers of reoperations. We report the case of a 38-year-old man who developed recurrent delayed cardiac constriction following the implantation of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene neo-pericardium. Careful preoperative planning is recommended to plan the optimal method of pericardioplasty, taking into account the pros and cons of each available material.

Impact of concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement on operative morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of concomitant ascending aortic replacement on operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our institutional database for all patients undergoing elective isolated AVR and AVR with concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta between January 2009 and May 2020. Patients undergoing surgery for infective endocarditis or requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest were excluded. A 3:1 propensity matching was performed for 688 patients to compare isolated AVR (120 patients) with AVR + ascending aortic replacement (40 patients). RESULTS: There were significant differences in median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time [92.5 (75-114) vs 118.5 (104-131) min; P < 0.001], median aortic cross-clamp time [65.0 (51.5-78.5) vs 84.5 (77-94) min; P < 0.001] and median intensive care unit stay [1 (1-3) vs 2 (1-6) days; P < 0.01]. There was no significant difference in the use of intraoperative and postoperative blood products, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative atrial fibrillation, acute renal failure, incidence of stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta significantly prolongs CPB and aortic clamp times but does not increase operative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, replacement of a dilated ascending aorta appears to be the most durable and safest treatment option in patients undergoing AVR with an aneurysmatic ascending aorta.

Postcardiotomy mechanical support in patients with mitral valve prostheses is associated with poor survival.

AIMS: To elaborate on early survival in patients with mitral valve replacement requiring temporary extracorporeal life support system (ECLS). METHODS: We analyzed survival, significant bleeding, wound infection, and ECLS duration in 421 from 14,400 patients with postoperative need for ECLS from January 2008 to December 2017 at our institution. Finally, patients were stratified according to the type of surgery performed: the mitral group (mitral valve replacement) n = 63 and the control group (any cardiac surgery excluding the mitral valve) n = 358. In order to adjust for preoperative patient characteristics, a propensity matching analysis was performed. Differences in in-hospital mortality were analyzed accordingly. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the mitral group as compared to the control group before and after adjustment (p < 0.001). Median duration of ECLS was 4 days in both groups. Perioperative bleeding (p < 0.001) and wound infection (p < 0.001) also showed significant worse outcome parameters in the mitral group. The main causes of death in the mitral group were multiorgan failure, n = 48 (76%), stroke, n = 7 (12%), and intracardiac thrombus formation, n = 5 (10%). CONCLUSIONS: ECLS is associated with a high in-hospital mortality rate in patients after mitral valve replacement.

Moderate or Severe Functional MR and Severe AS: Is Mitral Valve Surgery Justified?

OBJECTIVE: Mitral regurgitation (MR) and severe aortic valve stenosis often coexist. Concomitant replacement of both valves is associated with a significantly higher morbidity and mortality. This study sought to investigate the progression of MR after isolated aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We analyzed the severity and progression of MR, survival and echocardiographic parameters in 506 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and moderate to severe functional MR who received isolated aortic valve replacement during a 9-year period. RESULTS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was performed in 381 patients and 125 patients received surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The median age of the cohort was 82 years. Median ejection fraction before and after TAVI or SAVR was 35 and 36% respectively (p = 0.64). There was a statistically significant reduction in the MR (p < 0.001) within both groups. Survival in both groups at 5 years was at 25%. CONCLUSION: Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with accompanying moderate to severe functional MR may present an adequate treatment option for this high-risk patient collective.

Efficacy of Vascular Closure Devices in Closing Large-Bore Sheath Arterial Sites after Treatment with Extracorporeal Life Support System.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated vascular complications and wound infections after surgical or percutaneous transfemoral removal of temporary extracorporeal life support systems (ECLSs). METHODS: A total of 83 patients were weaned from ECLS between August 2015 and September 2020. We analyzed for a composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections requiring negative-pressure wound therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: percutaneous group using the MANTA vascular occlusion system (VCD; Teleflex, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States) (n = 23) and surgical group (n = 60). RESULTS: The median age in the entire cohort was 67 years. Vascular complications were seen in 20% (n = 12) in the surgical group and in 13% (n = 3) in the percutaneous group (p = 0.72). A total of 32% (n = 19) in the surgical group and 9% (n = 2) in the percutaneous group (p = 0.031) had wound infections. A composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections showed significantly more complications in the surgical group (52%, n = 31) as compared with the percutaneous group (22%, n = 5) (p = 0.020). The median duration in the intensive care unit was 13 days for the surgical group and 12 days for the percutaneous group without any significant difference in both groups (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Using the MANTA VCD for percutaneous removal of ECLS cannulas after weaning from ECLS is safe and reproducible. A composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections was significantly lower in the percutaneous removal group as compared with the surgical group.

Treatment of infectious aortic disease with bovine pericardial tube grafts.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of bovine pericardial tube graft repair for infectious aortic disease in any aortic segment. METHODS: Between May 2015 and July 2020, 45 patients were treated for infectious aortic disease of the native (n = 9) aorta or after (endo-)graft (n = 36) implantation with bovine pericardial tube grafts. Clinical, infectious details, outcomes and follow-up data were evaluated. RESULTS: All aortic segments underwent pericardial tube graft or bifurcational replacement: the aortic root (n = 12, 27%), ascending aorta (n = 18, 40%), aortic arch (n = 7, 16%), descending aorta (n = 5, 11%), thoraco-abdominal aorta (n = 6, 13%) and abdominal aorta (n = 18, 40%) including the iliac arteries (n = 14, 31%). Organ fistulation (n = 15, 33%) was the most common underlying pathology. Seven patients (16%) expired in-hospital secondary to ongoing sepsis (n = 5, 11%), respiratory failure (n = 1, 2%) and unknown cause (n = 1, 2%). A fungal infection was predictive for in-hospital mortality (P = 0.026, odds ratio: 19.470). After a median follow-up of 11 [first quartile: 2, third quartile 26] months, 9 additional patients (20%) expired and 1 patient developed a postoperative spondylodiscitis at the level of the aortic tube graft. Hence, freedom from proven aortic graft re-infection was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: Orthotopic aortic reconstruction using bovine pericardial tube grafts to treat infectious aortic disease is possible in any aortic segment. Organ fistulation is a frequently observed disease mechanism requiring concomitant treatment. Granted, the early attrition rate is substantial, but after the initial period, both survival and freedom from re-infection appear encouraging.

Direct Versus Side Graft Cannulation From the Right Axillary Artery in Thoracic Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The axillary artery can be cannulated for antegrade cerebral perfusion directly or by employing a prosthetic vascular graft anastomosed to the artery. METHODS: From 2008 until 2019, 688 patients underwent axillary artery cannulation. Of those, 287 underwent direct cannulation and 401 cannulation through a side graft. We identified risk factors for cannulation-related complications, and after propensity score matching, we compared the 2 matched cohorts' cannulation-related and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A smaller axillary-artery diameter (odds ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.87) and emergency surgery (odds ratio = 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.92) were identified as risk factors for cannulation-associated complications. In the propensity score-matched cohorts (n = 266 in each), the number of patients experiencing cannulation-related complications was significantly higher in the direct cannulation group than in the side-graft group (n = 33 [12.4%] versus n = 15 [5.6%]; P = .01). The direct group's incidence of iatrogenic axillary artery dissection was significantly higher (n = 17 [6.4%] versus n = 4 [1.5%] P = .008); their incidence of postoperative stroke was also significantly higher (n = 39 [14.7%] versus n = 21 [7.9%]; P = .025). Patients cannulated with a side graft needed more transfusions of blood products (median [IQR]: 3.0 [1.0-6.0] versus 4.0 [2.0-7.0;] P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Cannulating the right axillary through a vascular prosthetic graft reduces cannulation-related complications such as iatrogenic axillary artery dissection and lowers stroke rates. To help prevent cannulation-related complications and stroke, we recommend the routine use of a side graft when cannulating the axillary artery.

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the care of patients with acute and chronic aortic conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures. METHODS: Forty departments shared their data on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures between January and May 2020 and January and May 2019 in Europe, Asia and the USA. Admission rates as well as delay from onset of symptoms to referral were compared. RESULTS: No differences in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures were observed between 2020 and the reference period in 2019 [incidence rates ratio (IRR): 0.96, confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.04; P = 0.39]. Also, no difference in the time interval from acute onset of symptoms to referral was recorded (<12 h 32% vs > 12 h 68% in 2020, < 12 h 34% vs > 12 h 66% in 2019 P = 0.29). Conversely, a decline of 35% in elective procedures was seen (IRR: 0.81, CI 0.76-0.87; P < 0.001) with substantial differences between countries and the most pronounced decline in Italy (-40%, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in Switzerland, an increase in the number of elective cases was observed (+35%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no change in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic cases and procedures during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the case load of elective operations and procedures decreased significantly. Patients with acute aortic syndromes presented despite COVID-19 and were managed according to current guidelines. Further analysis is required to prove that deferral of elective cases had no impact on premature mortality.