Programmatic evaluation of interprofessional education: a quality improvement tool.

Robust demonstration of high-quality, fit-for-purpose interprofessional education (IPE) is essential for today's health professional students, staff, curricula, and regulatory bodies. As IPE moves from discrete "events" to fully embedded spirals of learning across degree programme curricula, effective mechanisms for monitoring continuous quality improvement are paramount. An accreditation tool was therefore developed for all learning activities contributing to the IPE curriculum of a university in Aotearoa New Zealand. We worked over 15 months, introducing a user-friendly tool to collect data, managing accreditation processes, and integrating with wider systems. We identified key levers to monitor, adjust, and continuously improve quality in IPE teaching and learning at individual-activity and programmatic levels.

Improving management of sexually transmitted infections in primary care: feasibility and acceptability of a new patient management tool for clinicians.

INTRODUCTION Routinely following an evidence-based clinical pathway of care for bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as chlamydia or gonorrhoea is important to help reduce the spread of infections, prevent reinfections and avoid associated health complications. AIM To develop an easy-to-use tool for routine use by primary care clinicians to ensure best practice management of patients tested for and diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhoea. METHODS The tool (a MedTech Advanced Form) was developed in consultation with seven primary care clinicians and included different tabs for use during the STI care pathway (testing, treatment, advice, partner notification and follow up) with clickable links to relevant online resources. The tool was trialled over 3 months by 19 clinicians in three Wellington primary care clinics - two youth health and a student health service. Outcome measures were frequency of use, completeness of fields related to best practice care and clinician acceptance of the tool (from focus group feedback). RESULTS The tool was used for approximately one in four patients who were tested during the trial period, with 'forgetting' reported as the most common reason for non-use. Clinician views about the tool were favourable, with most indicating they would like to continue use and would recommend it to colleagues. Documentation of best practice care was excellent; fields to record reasons for testing, discussion of sexual history, provision of treatment and advice given were used for most patients for whom the form was completed. CONCLUSIONS Inclusion of this STI management tool in the electronic patient records system appeared to improve primary care clinicians' delivery and documentation of best practice sexual health care at a practice level. Wider use of a modified version of this tool could facilitate more comprehensive best practice management of bacterial STIs.

Trusting me, trusting you: Creating conditions for successful pre-registration interprofessional education in rural New Zealand workplace settings.

There is a growing body of evidence supporting the provision of interprofessional education for pre-registration health science students. Furthermore, there is emergent evidence supporting the provision of interprofessional opportunities in rural workplaces. The strategies used by tertiary education providers in establishing and sustaining these rural interprofessional initiatives currently remain unclear, including how to foster authentic engagement with indigenous rural communities. This short commentary seeks to provide some practical guidance on how to successfully implement and maintain rural interprofessional experiences for pre-registration students.

Five years on: Influences on early career health professionals from a rural interprofessional pre-registration immersion program.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain former students' perceptions of and influences from a final-year pre-registration, rurally located, clinically based, 5 week interprofessional program on their subsequent work and career in the health professions. DESIGN: Online survey delivered 5 years post-program (4 years post-graduation). SETTING: The Tairawhiti interprofessional education program was first undertaken in 2012/2013 by students from six health professional degree programs (dentistry, dietetics, medicine, nursing, pharmacy and physiotherapy) in the Tairawhiti region, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Health professionals who attended the Tairawhiti interprofessional education program in 2012/2013 as students were invited to participate; 70 of 86 (81%) responded in 2017/2018. RESULTS: Five years on, most respondents (91%;64/70) were working as health professionals, with a fifth (23%;15/64) working overseas. Of those currently practising in New Zealand, 51% (24/47) were working in hospital practice and 49% (23/47) in the community, with 56% (27/48) working in metropolitan areas and 44% (21/48) in regional/rural locations. Of the 51 respondents who provided free-text comments about perceived influences of program participation, the majority described positive influences on their clinical practice as health professionals or their subsequent career choices. Five themes emerged from the free-text data: 'made me a better clinician'; 'made me consider rural/regional work'; 'collaborating for care'; 'choosing an area of practice to work in,' and 'little or no impact.' CONCLUSION: This work reports positive influences on subsequent careers among respondents who had previously participated as final-year students in a rurally located IPE program, particularly with respect to interprofessional working, rural health, and contextual and cultural influences.

Collaborative Care in Primary Care: The Influence of Practice Interior Architecture on Informal Face-to-Face Communication-An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Quality patient care in primary care settings, especially for patients with complex long-term health needs, is improved by interprofessional collaborative practice. Effective collaboration is achieved in large part by frequent informal face-to-face "on-the-fly" communication between team members. Research undertaken in hospitals shows that interior architecture influences informal communication and collaboration between staff. However, little is known about how the interior architecture of primary care practices might facilitate or hinder informal communication and collaboration among primary care staff. OBJECTIVES: This research explores the influence of primary care practice interior architecture on face-to-face on-the-fly communication for collaborative care. METHODS: An observational study was undertaken to compare face-to-face informal interactions between staff in three primary care practices of differing interior architecture. Data collected from practices included: direct observations floor plans, photographs, interviews, and surveys. RESULTS: Most primary care staff engaged in frequent, brief face-to-face interactions, which appeared to be key to the delivery of effective collaboration. Features of primary care practice designs that were associated with increased frequency of staff interaction included shared spaces, staff proximity/visibility, and the presence of convenient circulatory and transitional spaces where staff were able to easily engage in timely on-the-fly communication with colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: The interior architecture of primary care practices has an important impact on staff collaboration. Although more research is needed to investigate further details in more practices, close attention should nevertheless be paid to maximizing opportunities for brief face-to-face communication in well-designed shared spaces in primary care practices.

'Should I vaccinate my child?' comparing the displayed stances of vaccine information retrieved from Google, Facebook and YouTube.

Whether to vaccinate or not is currently a hot topic in social discourse. Despite the majority view that childhood vaccination is safe and effective, websites and social media content opposing such vaccination are common. In this study, we searched the internet platforms Google, Facebook and YouTube for childhood vaccine information. We made every attempt to minimise selection bias generated by internet algorithms. We compared the displayed stances of vaccine information retrieved. Most of the information had a clearly stated stance on vaccines or made some sort of recommendation on whether or not to vaccinate. Despite our careful attempt to search comprehensively and systematically for vaccine information with as little bias as possible, this search yielded a sizeable minority of vaccine negative information. This research shows that negative vaccine information persists and is readily accessible online despite algorithm and policy changes in recent years, even when searching in the least biased way possible. It is important that vaccine-promoting entities and agencies continue to make every effort to maximize their presence online so that parents searching the internet to answer the question 'should I vaccinate my child?' continue to receive vaccine positive information.

Collaborative care in 'Youth One Stop Shops' in New Zealand: Hidden, time-consuming, essential.

Young people in New Zealand have high morbidity but low service utilization rates. Dedicated youth services 'Youth One Stop Shops' provide 'wraparound' health and social care. However, little is understood about how staff within these services interact with each other or with external agencies to provide this specialist care. This article reports on volume and type of internal and inter-agency health and social service staff-staff interactions, to better understand elements of potential collaboration in day-to-day practice. An observational, case-study approach was utilized. Four dedicated youth services recorded data over three-month periods about a selected number of high-use clients. Youth service staff recorded all interactions with colleagues within their organization and staff from external services. A large volume of non-patient contact work was revealed, with a high proportion of 'complex/involved' interactions recorded. The range and diversity of external agencies with which youth service staff interacted with to meet the needs of young people was extensive and complex. The focus on 'information sharing' and 'complex/involved' interactions demonstrates a well-coordinated, wraparound service delivery model. Current funding formulae take inadequate account of the volume of non-patient contact work that youth services provide for high-needs young people.

Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Retesting and Reinfection Rates in New Zealand Health Care Settings: Implications for Sexually Transmitted Infection Control.

BACKGROUND: Reinfection with chlamydia or gonorrhea is common and can lead to significant reproductive health complications so testing for reinfection after treatment is recommended. This study described retesting and reinfection rates in regions of New Zealand with higher-than-average population rates of chlamydia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed chlamydia and gonorrhea testing data from 2 laboratories providing community testing services for 4 higher-rate regions in the North Island of New Zealand. Three years of data were obtained (2015-2017) to include a minimum of 6-month follow-up for all individuals. Retesting and reinfection rates between 6 weeks and 6 months of a positive result were calculated, and time to retesting was plotted using Kaplan-Meier curves. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine the odds of retesting (outcome 1) and reinfection (outcome 2) between 6 weeks and 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 34% (3151/9241) of the cohort was retested within the recommended period, of whom 21% retested positive. Significant differences were observed in the odds of retesting by sex, age band, ethnic group, clinic type, and region (P < 0.01). The odds of a subsequent positive on retesting within 6 months differed significantly by sex, age band, and ethnic group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reflect substantial gaps in the delivery of best-practice sexually transmitted infection management in New Zealand. There is a clear need to prioritize the implementation of clinic-level processes to support clinicians in the routine delivery of best-practice sexual health care. These should include routine provision of patient advice about retesting and strategies to promote timely and equitable access to retesting.

What does palliative care look like in a New Zealand aged residential care facility when patients are admitted to die?

AIMS: New Zealanders dying in public hospitals or hospices are increasingly being discharged and admitted-to-die in aged residential care (ARC) facilities as hospitals and hospices struggle to meet demand. This study sought to investigate how care is delivered to patients admitted-to-die in an ARC facility. METHODS: A mixed-methods case study including a clinical notes review of seven patients who died in one ARC facility within three months of admission and a focus group with ARC facility staff and visiting professionals from other organisations. RESULTS: The clinical notes review showed a high burden of palliative care symptoms that constituted specialist palliative care, provided by ARC staff plus professionals from other organisations. Focus group data showed those involved were willing, but expressed significant concern about lack of structure and funding. CONCLUSIONS: As our increasing and aging population reaches end-of-life, New Zealand hospitals/hospices will not be able to provide ongoing specialist palliative care and admission-to-die in ARC facilities may be a viable alternative. However, ARC facilities are not set up or staffed to provide specialist palliative care of those admitted-to-die. A specific model of care that is funded appropriately is required.

Clinician education, advice and SMS/text reminders improve test of reinfection rates following diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae: before and after study in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines for the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae recommend testing for reinfection 3-6 months following treatment, but retesting rates are typically low. METHODS: Participants included six primary care clinics taking part in a pilot study of strategies designed to improve partner notification, follow-up and testing for reinfection. Rates of retesting between 6 weeks and 6 months of a positive chlamydia or gonorrhoea diagnosis were compared across two time periods: (1) a historical control period (no systematic approach to retesting) and (2) during an intervention period involving clinician education, patient advice about reinfection risk reduction and retesting, and short messaging service/text reminders sent 2-3 months post-treatment inviting return for retesting. Retesting was calculated for demographic subgroups (reported with 95% CI). RESULTS: Overall 25.4% (61 of 240, 95% CI 20.0 to 31.4) were retested during the control period and 47.9% (116 of 242, 95% CI 43.2 to 55.1) during the intervention period. Retesting rates increased across most demographic groups, with at least twofold increases observed for men, those aged 20-29 years old, and Maori and Pasifika ethnic groups. No significant difference was observed in repeat positivity rates for the two time periods, 18% (11 of 61) retested positive during the control and 16.4% (19 of 116) during the intervention period (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Clinician and patient information about retesting and a more systematic approach to follow-up resulted in significant increases in proportions tested for reinfection within 6 months. These simple strategies could readily be implemented into primary healthcare settings to address low rates of retesting for bacterial sexually transmitted infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000837426.

Addressing Gaps in the Management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Primary Care: Lessons Learned in a Pilot Intervention Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to test the acceptability and utility of strategies designed to facilitate the delivery of clinical best practice for patients diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea in primary care. METHODS: A nonrandomized pilot intervention study with a historic control period was run over 9 months in six primary health care clinics (2 youth services, 3 low-fee clinics, and 1 student health service) in Wellington, New Zealand. "Study nurses" in participating clinics oversaw the implementation of strategies designed to facilitate partner notification and follow-up for patients diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea. Clinics chose which of 2 approaches they wished to trial-either managing all study processes themselves or drawing on the assistance of an external specialist sexual health advisor. Outcome measures included acceptability and utility of study processes ascertained via structured interviews with study nurses and collection of clinical data. RESULTS: Outcomes for 287 patients seen during the intervention were compared with 240 historic controls. Participant views on study processes were positive overall, and all clinics intended to continue all or most of the study processes implemented. During the intervention, substantial improvements were observed in documented patient management (sexual history, partner notification, and outcomes, P < 0.05). Increases were observed in percentages of patients reached for follow-up (74% vs. 26% at baseline, P < 0.05) and partners reported to have been notified (79% vs. 23%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led strategies implemented were deemed acceptable and appeared to facilitate delivery of best practice care for patients diagnosed with bacterial sexually transmitted infections in participating primary care practices.

Interagency collaborative care for young people with complex needs: Front-line staff perspectives.

Worldwide, a growing burden of health and social issues now affect young people. Interagency collaboration and the "integration" of health and social care services are advocated to address the increasingly complex needs of at-risk youth and to reduce barriers to accessing care. In New Zealand, Youth-One-Stop-Shops (YOSSs) provide integrated health and social care to young people with complex needs. Little is known about how YOSSs facilitate collaborative care. This study explored the collaboration between YOSSs and external agencies between 2015 and 2017 using a multiple case study method. This paper reports qualitative focus group and individual interview data from two of four case sites including six YOSS staff and 14 external agency staff. Results showed participants regarded collaboration as critical to the successful care of high needs young people and were positive about working together. They believed YOSSs provided effective wraparound collaborative care and actively facilitated communication between diverse agencies on behalf of young people. The main challenges participants faced when working together related to the different "world views" and cultures of agencies which can run contrary to collaborative practice. Despite this, some highly collaborative relationships were apparent and staff in the different agencies perceived YOSSs had a lead role in co-ordinating collaborative care and were genuinely valued and trusted. However without the YOSS involvement, collaboration between agencies in relation to young people was less frequent and rarely went beyond limited information exchange. Establishing and maintaining trusting interpersonal relationships with individual staff was key to successfully negotiating agency differences. The study confirms that collaboration when caring for young people with high needs is complex and challenging, yet agencies from diverse sectors value collaboration and see the YOSS integrated wraparound approach as an important model of care.

Daily decision-making about food during pregnancy: a New Zealand study.

Pregnancy has always been a life-changing event for women and their families, but societal concern about pregnancy and motherhood has become intense in the digital age. The role of health promotion agencies and others supplying health-related resources about lifestyle behaviours is both important and in need of scrutiny. Ever increasing advice for pregnant women, their families and health professionals, abounds. This study of decision making during pregnancy investigated how women made everyday decisions during pregnancy about food and drink, as well as dietary supplements and medications, alcohol and recreational drugs. This qualitative interview study was a side-arm to a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted with pregnant women in Wellington New Zealand, 2013-2016. Data from interviews with 20 women were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. In relation to decision-making about lifestyle behaviours, five themes emerged-Information about food; Wanted and unwanted advice; Worry, anxiety and indecision; Making daily decisions about food; Changes in decision making over time. Participating women talked more about food selection and restriction advice than any other lifestyle topic. Analysis demonstrated concern about information accuracy and overload from multiple, diverse sources. Women described learning how to assess resource credibility, how to develop decision-making skills, and who to trust. The study raises important questions about how the health information environment, despite best intentions, can be confusing or potentially harmful. The study underlines the continued importance of the role health professionals have in not only interpreting information to discuss individualized advice, but also in empowering pregnant women to develop lifestyle-related decision-making skills.

Partner notification and retesting for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a case-note review in New Zealand primary care.

INTRODUCTION Bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) contribute to a significant burden of ill-health despite being easy to diagnose and treat. STI management guidelines provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance on best-practice case management. AIM To determine the extent of adherence to STI management guidelines for partner notification, follow up and testing for reinfection following diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. METHODS Retrospective review of electronic patient records for individuals diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhoea in eight primary care clinics in Wellington, New Zealand. At each clinic, 40 clinical records were reviewed (320 in total). Outcome measures were: overall numbers (%) of cases with documented evidence of reason for testing, sexual history, treatment, advice, partner notification and follow up. Partner notification outcomes were: n (%) with evidence of partner notification discussion and n (%) with partners advised, tested and treated. Proportions retested between 6 weeks and 6 months and n (%) positive on retesting were also determined. RESULTS Presenting features and treatment were generally well documented. Recent sexual history including number of partners was documented for half of cases reviewed (159/320). Partner notification discussion was documented for 74% (237/320) of cases, but only 24.4% (78/320) had documentation on numbers of partners notified and 17% (54/320) on numbers of partners treated. Testing for reinfection between 6 weeks and 6 months occurred for 24.7% (79/320), of whom 19% (15/79) re-tested positive. CONCLUSIONS This research suggests there are gaps in important aspects of patient care following bacterial STI diagnosis - a factor that may be perpetuating our high rates of infection. A more systematic approach will be needed to ensure people diagnosed with an STI receive the full cycle of care in line with best practice guidelines.

Exploring interprofessional, interagency multimorbidity care: case study based observational research.

BACKGROUND: The increase in multimorbidity or co-occurring chronic illnesses is a leading healthcare concern. Patients with multimorbidity require ongoing care from many different professionals and agencies, and often report a lack of integrated care. OBJECTIVE: To explore the daily help-seeking behaviours of patients with multimorbidity, including which health professionals they seek help from, how professionals work together, and perceptions and characteristics of effective interprofessional, interagency multimorbidity care. DESIGN: Using a case study observational research design, multiple data sources were assembled for four patients with multimorbidity, identified by two general practitioners in New Zealand. In this paper, two case studies are presented, including the recorded instances of contact and communication between patients and professionals, and between professionals. Professional interactions were categorized as consultation, coordination, or collaboration. RESULTS: The two case studies illustrated two female patients with likely similar educational levels, but with different profiles of multimorbidity, social circumstances, and personal capabilities, involving various professionals and agencies. Engagement between professionals showed varying levels of interaction and a lack of clarity about leadership or care coordination. The majority of interactions were one-to-one consultations and rarely involved coordination and collaboration. Patients were rarely included in communications between professionals. CONCLUSION: Cases constructed from multiple data sources illustrate the complexity of day-to-day, interprofessional, interagency multimorbidity care. While consultation is the most frequent mode of professional interaction, targeted coordinated and collaborative interactions (including the patient) are highly effective activities. Greater attention should be given to developing and facilitating these interactions and determining who should lead them.

Assessment of training capacity in New Zealand general practices: a stocktake in the lower North Island and South Island.

AIM: General practices are providing clinically-based training for rapidly increasing numbers of medical (and other health professional) trainees. This study investigated capacity and intention of general practices to additionally teach junior doctors (now required to undertake community-based attachments by the New Zealand Medical Council) alongside current trainees in their service. METHODS: A web-based/telephone survey of all general practices was developed and administered November 2015-April 2016. RESULTS: In the Otago study region (lower North Island, South Island), 463 currently operating practices were identified. (A companion Auckland-based study concurrently investigated the upper North Island.) Of the 280/463 (60%) responding practices, 93% (261/280) were currently taking health professional trainees, with 86% (241/280) taking at least one type of medical trainee. Practices indicate that 14% fewer of them will take undergraduate medical students than previously (199 practices down to 162), but more would take junior doctors (42 up to 79) and GP registrars (129 practices up to 142). CONCLUSIONS: Most practices in these regions already contribute to teaching. Practices indicated limitations in accommodating continued increases in numbers of trainees in the current poorly coordinated system. Improved support and training for practices is needed to enable practices to take more trainees of multiple types per practice, both concurrently and sequentially.

Chlamydia testing and diagnosis following initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) effectively protects against pregnancy but provides no protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs). AIM: To compare rates of chlamydia testing and diagnosis for women initiating long-acting versus oral contraception. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study involving data collection for 6160 women initiating post-abortion contraception at a large New Zealand regional public hospital abortion clinic (2009-2012), with chlamydia testing data obtained from the local laboratory during two-year follow up. Negative binomial regression modelling examined the effect of contraceptive method on two outcome measures: chlamydia testing and chlamydia diagnosis (adjusting for potential covariates of age, ethnicity, past chlamydia infection, pregnancy history) in year one and two of follow up. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred and twenty nine women (44%) received a LARC and 1764 (28.6%) were prescribed oral contraception. Adjusted testing rates differed by contraceptive method only in year one (P < 0.01): with higher rates among copper intrauterine device users (relative risk (RR) 1.2, 95% CI 1.06-1.35), and lower rates for implant users (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.99) compared with oral contraceptive users (reference group). No significant differences were observed in chlamydia diagnosis rates by contraceptive method (P > 0.05). Younger age, past chlamydia infection, Maori and Pacific ethnicity were associated with higher rates of chlamydia diagnosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Known STI-related risk factors (age, ethnicity, past infection) but not contraceptive method were independently related to rates of subsequent chlamydia diagnosis. This suggests that increased LARC uptake would not occur at the expense of chlamydia control. Regular screening and risk reduction advice (including condom use) are important chlamydia control measures for at-risk groups.

Retesting and repeat positivity following diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea in New Zealand: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Testing for reinfection at 3 to 6 months following treatment for Chlamydia Trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoea is recommended in best practice sexual health management guidelines. This study aimed to describe rates of retesting and repeat positivity following diagnosis of chlamydia or gonorrhoea in a defined geographic region of New Zealand. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in Wellington, New Zealand involving analysis of laboratory data for chlamydia and gonorrhoea tests performed in primary care and sexual health clinics (July 2012-July 2015). OUTCOME MEASURES: rate of retesting and rate of repeat positivity 6 weeks to 6 months after a positive result (index event). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot time from first index event to retest. Logistic regression modelling was used to determine the odds of retesting and repeat positivity between 6 weeks and 6 months of follow-up, adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation). RESULTS: Overall 29.4% (1919/6530) of the cohort was retested between 6 weeks and 6 months, with 18% (347/1919) of those retested returning positive results. Lower odds of retesting were observed for males (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.34-0.48), and individuals of NZ Maori (OR 0.72, 0.61-0.85) and Pacific ethnicities (OR 0.49, 0.39-0.62, reference European). Factors associated with higher odds of repeat positivity on retesting included male gender (OR 2.0, 1.14-2.82), age 15-19 years (OR 1.78, 1.32-2.41, reference 20-24 years), chlamydia/gonorrhoea co-infection (OR 2.39, 1.32-4.35, reference chlamydia only), Maori (OR 1.6, 1.18-2.17) and Pacific ethnicities (OR 1.88, 1.22-2.9, reference European). CONCLUSIONS: We observed low adherence to STI retesting guidelines, and marked gender and ethnic disparities in rates of retesting and repeat positivity. Low retesting rates are suggestive of low levels of awareness of this aspect of patient management, and an absence of a systematic approach to retesting. High rates of repeat positivity reinforce the importance of advising patients about reducing their risk of reinfection, including notification and treatment of all recent sexual partners. Greater priority needs to be placed on increasing retesting and reducing rates of reinfection, with strategies implemented to improve these important aspects of patient care and population STI control.

The experiences of pregnant women in an interventional clinical trial: Research In Pregnancy Ethics (RIPE) study.

There is increasing global pressure to ensure that pregnant women are responsibly and safely included in clinical research in order to improve the evidence base that underpins healthcare delivery during pregnancy. One supposed barrier to inclusion is the assumption that pregnant women will be reluctant to participate in research. There is however very little empirical research investigating the views of pregnant women. Their perspective on the benefits, burdens and risks of research is a crucial component to ensuring effective recruitment. The Research In Pregnancy Ethics (RIPE) study set out to ascertain the views of pregnant women about research participation using an inductive thematic analysis. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 women who had participated in a double-blind randomised placebo controlled trial in Wellington (New Zealand) while pregnant. Our results show that at least some pregnant women recognise the value and importance of research during pregnancy. The women we interviewed were deeply invested in the research process and outcomes. Key motivations for participating were altruism, playing a valuable civic role and the importance of research. The main perceived burdens related to inconvenience and time commitment. For some women, possible randomization to the placebo arm was regarded as a burden or disadvantage.

Case Study Observational Research: A Framework for Conducting Case Study Research Where Observation Data Are the Focus.

Case study research is a comprehensive method that incorporates multiple sources of data to provide detailed accounts of complex research phenomena in real-life contexts. However, current models of case study research do not particularly distinguish the unique contribution observation data can make. Observation methods have the potential to reach beyond other methods that rely largely or solely on self-report. This article describes the distinctive characteristics of case study observational research, a modified form of Yin's 2014 model of case study research the authors used in a study exploring interprofessional collaboration in primary care. In this approach, observation data are positioned as the central component of the research design. Case study observational research offers a promising approach for researchers in a wide range of health care settings seeking more complete understandings of complex topics, where contextual influences are of primary concern. Future research is needed to refine and evaluate the approach.