Local treatment in initially unresected non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas of children and adolescents: A retrospective single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) are a heterogeneous group of aggressive tumors. Patients with locally advanced/initially unresected disease represent a subset of patients with unsatisfactory outcome: limited data are available on the best treatment approach, in particular regarding local therapy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis concerned 71 patients < 21 years old with nonmetastatic, initially unresected adult-type NRSTS, treated at a referral center for pediatric sarcomas from 1990 to 2021. Patients were treated using a multimodal approach, based on the protocols adopted at the time of their diagnosis. RESULTS: The series included a selected group of patients with unfavorable clinical characteristics, i.e., most cases had high-grade and large tumors, arising from axial sites in 61% of cases. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 58 (82%) had delayed surgery (R0 in 45 cases), and 50 (70%) had radiotherapy. Partial response to chemotherapy was observed in 46% of cases. With a median follow-up of 152 months (range, 18-233), 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 39.9% and 56.5%, respectively. Survival was significantly better for patients who responded to chemotherapy, and those who had a delayed R0 resection. Local relapse at 5 years was 7.7% for patients who did not undergo delayed surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our series underscores the unsatisfactory outcome of initially unresected NRSTS patients. Improving the outcome of this patient category requires therapeutic strategies able to combine novel effective systemic therapies with a better-defined local treatment approach to offer patients the best chances to have R0 surgery.

End-of-Life transfusion support at hospice and pediatric oncology unit: Bridging the gap between benefits and therapeutic alliance.

OBJECTIVES: Although transfusion support is commonly used in oncological palliative care, there is still a paucity of literature. We examined the transfusion support provided in the terminal stage of the disease and compared the approach at a pediatric oncology unit and a pediatric hospice. CASE DESCRIPTION: This case series analyzed patients treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT)'s pediatric oncology unit who died between January 2018 and April 2022. We compared these with those who died at the VIDAS hospice and analyzed the number of complete blood counts taken in a patient's last 14 days of life, and the number of transfusions performed in the same period.We analyzed 44 patients (22 in pediatric oncology unit; 22 in hospice) in total. Twenty-eight complete blood counts were performed (7/22 patients at the hospice; 21/22 patients at the pediatric oncology unit). Nine patients were given transfusions, three at the hospice, six at our pediatric oncology unit (24 transfusions in total): 20 transfusions at the pediatric oncology unit, four at the hospice. In total 17/44 patients were given active therapies in the last 14 days of life: 13 at the pediatric oncology unit, four at the pediatric hospice. Ongoing cancer treatments did not correlate with a greater likelihood of receiving a transfusion (p=0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The hospice's approach was more conservative than the pediatric oncology one. In the in-hospital setting, the need for a transfusion cannot always be decided on by a combination of numerical values and parameters alone. The family's emotional-relational response must be considered too.

Treating secondary malignant neoplasms: A burden of childhood cancer survivors.

Each year approximately 35,000 children and adolescents are diagnosed with cancer in Europe. Five-year survival rates have improved and now reach 80% in most European countries, thanks to a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. To date, there are more than 44,000 Italians still living several years after being diagnosed with cancer in developmental age. The risk of premature morbidity and mortality for cancer survivors is well known and documented. Approximately 60% of survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence have at least one chronic health condition in later life, and more than one in four develop severe or life-threatening disorders. Among the various long-term iatrogenic sequelae of cancer treatments, the most worrisome are second malignant neoplasms. We reported on our mono-institutional experiences of screening and treating secondary breast cancer, secondary thyroid cancer and secondary osteosarcoma. Recommendations on the surveillance needed for cancer survivors because of the risk of late effects of their disease or its treatment suggest that discussing the potential problems early on can be crucial to a patient's future health. These considerations and our consolidated experience strengthen our conviction that survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence who develop second malignant neoplasms should be treated at highly-specialized centers. Multidisciplinary care requires close communications and high levels of up-to-date professional expertise. This challenging area of health care is also changing rapidly because cancer survivorship is a work in progress, but we cannot wait for definitive conclusions on many aspects because this will take decades, especially for pediatric patients.

Acute Kidney Injury with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pediatric Patients Receiving High-Dose Methotrexate Chemotherapy: A Report of Three Cases.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is renally excreted. HDMTX (high dose-methotrexate)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a non-oliguric decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) heralded by an acute rise in serum creatinine. Moreover, AKI is also a frequent complication of COVID-19. Among our patients treated with HDMTX, some of these developed AKI during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, we wondered whether our patients' kidney failure might have been triggered by their underlying SARS-CoV-2 positivity. METHODS: Data were collected from the database at the Pediatric Oncology Unit of the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan (Italy) regarding patients who matched the following selective criteria: (a) treatment with HDMTX during the pandemic period; (b) SARS-CoV-2 infection during the treatment; (c) development of AKI during HDMTX treatment and SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: From March 2020 to March 2022, a total of 23 patients were treated with HDMTX; 3 patients were treated with HDMTX during SARS-CoV-2 infection and all 3 developed AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical manifestations associated with this virus are many, so we are not yet able to lower our guard and rule out this infection as a cause of clinical manifestations with any certainty.

Relapse after non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: The impact of routine surveillance imaging on early detection and post-relapse survival.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) whose disease relapses have little chance of being cured, so front-line treatments are usually followed up with surveillance imaging in an effort to detect any recurrences as early as possible, and thereby improve post-relapse outcomes. The real benefit of such routine surveillance imaging in RMS remains to be demonstrated, however. This retrospective, single-center study examines how well surveillance imaging identifies recurrent tumors and its impact on post-relapse survival. METHODS: The analysis concerned 79 patients <21 years old treated between 1985 and 2020 whose initially localized RMS relapsed. Clinical findings, treatment modalities, and survival were analyzed, comparing patients whose relapse was first suspected from symptoms they developed (clinical symptoms group) with those whose relapse was identified by radiological surveillance (routine imaging group). RESULTS: Tumor relapses came to light because of clinical symptoms in 42 cases, and on routine imaging in 37. The time to relapse was much the same in the two groups. The median overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS rate were, respectively, 10 months and 12.6% in the clinical symptoms group, and 11 months and 27.5% in the routine imaging group (p-value .327). Among patients with favorable prognostic scores, survival was better for those in the routine imaging group (5-year OS 75.0% vs. 33.0%, p-value .047). CONCLUSION: It remains doubtful whether surveillance imaging has any real impact on RMS relapse detection and patients' post-relapse survival. Further studies are needed to establish the most appropriate follow-up recommendations, taking the potentially negative effects of regular radiological exams into account.

Relapse after nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Salvage rates and prognostic variables.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsing rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) pose a therapeutic challenge, and the survival rate is reportedly poor. We describe a retrospective series of relapsing RMS patients treated at a referral center for pediatric sarcoma, investigating the pattern of relapse, salvage rates, and factors correlating with final outcomes. METHODS: The analysis concerned 105 patients <21 years old treated from 1985 to 2020 with initially localized RMS at first relapse. For risk-adapted stratification purposes, patient outcomes were examined using univariable and multivariable analyses based on patients' clinical features at first diagnosis, first-line treatments, clinical findings at first relapse, and second-line treatments. RESULTS: First relapses occurred 0.08-4.8 years (median 1 year) following initial diagnosis and were local/locoregional in 59% of cases. Treatment at first relapse included chemotherapy in all but two cases, radiotherapy in 38, and surgery in 21. Median event-free survival (EFS) after first relapse was 4 months, while 5-year EFS was 16.3%; median overall survival (OS) was 9 months, while 5-year OS was 16.7%. Several variables influenced survival rates. Considering only clinical findings and treatment at relapse, Cox's multivariable analysis showed that OS correlated significantly with time to relapse, radiotherapy administered at relapse, response to chemotherapy, and whether a second remission was achieved. CONCLUSION: Survival following first relapse of patients with localized RMS at initial diagnosis is poor. The variables found to influence survival can be utilized in a risk-adapted model to estimate the chances of salvage to guide decisions for second-line treatments.

Secondary osteosarcoma: a challenge indeed.

BACKGROUND: The risk of survivors developing a secondary bone sarcoma after being treated for pediatric cancers is well established. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with secondary osteosarcoma (SOS). METHODS: The study concerns survivors of childhood and adolescence primary neoplasms (PN) treated with chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy and surgery, subsequently diagnosed with SOS. RESULTS: We identified 26 patients (13 females, 13 males) who developed SOS a median 7.3 years after being diagnosed with a PN (5/7 of these patients tested for Li-Fraumeni and found positive for the syndrome). The sample's median age was 8.0 and 15.0 years when their PN and SOS were diagnosed, respectively. To treat their PN, 24 out of 26 patients had been given radiotherapy, and 19 had received chemotherapy including doxorubicin. A considerable number of SOS occurred at unfavorable sites (nine hip bone, six skull). All but one patient received chemotherapy with tailored schedules, omitting doxorubicin in 19 cases. Eighteen of the 26 patients underwent surgery. The 5- and 10-year overall survival and probabilities after the diagnosis of SOS (95% confidence interval) were 50% (32.7-76.5%) and 38.9% (22.4-67.4%); 5- and 10-year progression-free survival was 47% (29.9-73.7%) and 35.2% (19.3-64.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates after SOS are lower than in patients with primary osteosarcoma, but not negligible. It is therefore mandatory to discuss the best choice of treatment for such patients at a referral center, in terms of their chances of cure and quality of life.

Palliative sedation in paediatric solid tumour patients: choosing the best drugs.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer remains the leading cause of mortality by disease in childhood in high-income countries. For terminally ill children, care focuses on quality of life, and patient management fundamentally affects grieving families. This paper describes our experience of palliative sedation (PS) for children with refractory symptoms caused by solid tumours, focusing on the drugs involved. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on all children treated for cancer who died at the pediatric oncology unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori between January 2016 and December 2020. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients eligible for the study, all but 4 received PS. Midazolam was always used, combined in 16 cases with other drugs (mainly classic neuroleptics, alpha-2 agonists and antihistamines). Throughout the period of PS and on the day of death, patients with sarcoma were given higher doses of midazolam and morphine, and more often received combinations of drugs than patients with brain tumours. Sarcoma causes significant symptoms, while brain tumours require less intensive analgesic-sedative therapies because they already impair a patient's state of consciousness. CONCLUSIONS: Optimising pharmacological treatments demands a medical team that knows how drugs (often developed for other indications) work. Emotional and relational aspects are important too, and any action to lower a patient's consciousness should be explained to the family and justified. Parents should not feel like helpless witnesses. Guidelines on PS in paediatrics could help, providing they acknowledge that a child's death is always a unique case.

Relapsing pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: The impact of routine imaging surveillance on early detection and post-relapse survival.

PURPOSE: The chances of patients with relapsing pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) being cured are limited. This retrospective single-institutional study examines the potential role of routine surveillance imaging for detecting recurrent tumor, and its impact on post-relapse survival. METHODS: The analysis concerned 86 patients < 21 years old with relapsing NRSTS treated from 1985 to 2020. Clinical findings, treatment modalities and survival were analyzed, comparing patients whose relapse was first suspected from symptoms (symptomatic group) with those whose relapse was detected by radiological surveillance (imaging group). RESULTS: Tumor relapses were identified from clinical symptoms in 49 cases and on routine imaging in 37. Time to relapse was similar in the two groups. Routine imaging detected 6/32 local relapses and 31/48 distant relapses (and 79% of the cases of lung metastases). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 34.3% for the symptomatic group, and 24.0% for the imaging group (p-value 0.270). In patients with lung metastases at relapse, the 5-year OS was statistically better for the imaging group, that is, 25.8% versus 0% for the symptomatic group (p-value 0.044). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to explore the role of surveillance imaging in pediatric NRSTS. Judging from our findings, the value of routine scanning of primary sites seems limited, while radiological surveillance may help to detect lung metastases, improving survival for this patient category. The potentially negative effects of periodic radiological exams should be considered in deciding the optimal follow-up for patients off therapy.

Ultra Short Course Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Children.

Early-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (ES-NHL) are associated with high survival rates. To minimize the risk of long-term sequelae, the duration and intensity of chemotherapy have been progressively reduced. Between 1988 and 2018, children with ES-NHL were treated at a single institute with two subsequent protocols. Protocol I consisted of a 7-week induction phase followed by a maintenance phase alternating 6-mercaptopurine plus MTX, a brief reinduction, and thioguanine plus cytosine arabinoside, for a total duration of 8 months. The subsequent protocol II (applied since 1997) was modified adding etoposide plus a further dose of HD-MTX and omitting maintenance in all histological subtypes except T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL), for a total duration of 9 weeks. Intrathecal prophylaxis was not provided in either protocol. With a median follow-up of 98.4 months, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates in protocol I (n = 21) and II (n = 25) were 76.2% and 96%, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 90.5% and 96%, respectively. None of the patients experienced disease progression or relapse within the central nervous system (CNS). Acute toxicity was manageable in both protocols, except for a case of presumed acute cardiotoxic death; no chronic sequelae were evident. Low-intensity chemotherapy for 9 weeks without intrathecal prophylaxis was sufficient for curing children with ES-NHL, without jeopardizing the excellent survival rate of this disease.

How ten-years of reirradiation for paediatric high-grade glioma may shed light on first line treatment.

PURPOSE: Recurrence incidence for paediatric/adolescent high-grade glioma (HGG) exceeds 80%. Reirradiation (reRT) palliates symptoms and delays further progression. Strategies for reRT are scarce: we retrospectively analysed our series to develop rational future approaches. METHODS: We re-evaluated MRI + RT plans of 21 relapsed HGG-patients, accrued 2010-2021, aged under 18 years. All underwent surgery and RT + chemotherapy at diagnosis. Pathologic/molecular re-evaluation allowed classification based on WHO 2021 criteria in 20/21 patients. Survival analyses and association with clinical parameters were performed. RESULTS: Relapse after 1st RT was local in 12 (7 marginal), 4 disseminated, 5 local + disseminated. Re-RT obtained 8 SD, 1 PR, 1PsPD, 1 mixed response, 10 PD; neurological signs/symptoms improved in 8. Local reRT was given to 12, followed again by 6 local (2 marginal) and 4 local + disseminated second relapses in 10/12 re-evaluated. The 4 with dissemination had 1 whole brain, 2 craniospinal irradiation (CSI), 1 spine reRT and further relapsed with dissemination and local + dissemination in 3/four assessed. Five local + disseminated tumours had 3 CSI, 1 spine reRT, further progressing locally (2), disseminated (1), n.a. (1). Three had a third RT; three were alive at 19.4, 29, 50.3 months after diagnosis. Median times to progression/survival after re-RT were 3.7 months (0.6-16.2 months)/6.9 months (0.6-17.9 months), improved for longer interval between 1st RT and re-RT (P = 0.017) and for non-PD after reRT (P < 0.001). First marginal relapse showed potential association with dissemination after re-RT (P = 0.081). CONCLUSIONS: This is the biggest series of re-RT in paediatric HGG. Considering the dissemination observed at relapse, our results could prompt the investigation of different first RT fields in a randomized trial.

Metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Evidence of the impact of radiotherapy on survival. A retrospective single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) remains largely unsatisfactory despite the adoption of intensive multimodal therapy. To assess the role of different treatments adopted over the years, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients <21 years old with metastatic RMS, treated from 1990 to 2020 at a referral center for pediatric sarcomas. METHODS: Patients were treated using a multimodal approach that included surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (both high-dose chemotherapy and maintenance therapy in some cases). The type of radiotherapy administered was categorized as radical (to all sites of disease); partial (to at least one, but not all sites of disease); or none. A landmark analysis was used to examine the impact of radiotherapy on survival, that is, patients who had an event before day 221 were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: The series included 80 patients. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 5 years were 17.3% and 21.3%, respectively. Survival was significantly associated with radiotherapy to metastatic sites, and with the radiotherapy category. In particular, 5-year EFS and OS rates were 70.6% and 76.0% for patients given radical radiotherapy, and 4.8% and 10.7%, respectively, for those given partial radiotherapy or none. Using the Cox multivariable analysis, OS correlated significantly with radiotherapy category. CONCLUSIONS: While confirming the poor overall outcome of patients with metastatic RMS, this study identified radiotherapy-when given to all sites of disease (including metastases)-as the main variable influencing survival.

Adult-type non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas in pediatric age: Salvage rates and prognostic factors after relapse.

PURPOSE: Though the prognosis for patients with pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) is generally good, the chances of being cured after relapse are limited. This report describes a series of relapsing NRSTS patients treated at a referral center for pediatric sarcoma, investigating the pattern of relapse, salvage rates, and factors correlating with the final outcome. METHODS: The analysis concerned 103 patients <21 years old with relapsing adult-type NRSTS treated from 1985 to 2020. For risk-adapted stratification purposes, the patient outcome was examined using univariable and multivariable analyses based on patients' clinical features at first diagnosis, first-line treatments, clinical findings at first relapse, and second-line treatments. RESULTS: The first relapse occurred within 2-102 months (median 14 months) after patients' first diagnosis and was local in 47%, metastatic in 34%, and both in 19%. Treatment at relapse included chemotherapy in 72 patients, radiotherapy in 38, and surgery in 55. The median overall survival (OS) was 20 months. Post-relapse OS was 56.1%, 25.8%, and 19.1% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Cox's multivariable regression analysis showed that OS was significantly better for patients with local and late relapses (occurring more than 12 months after their first diagnosis) and for those achieving secondary remission. CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with recurrent NRSTS is poor. The above-mentioned variables (type and time of relapse and achievement of secondary remission) were combined in a risk-adapted model to develop a tool for estimating the chance of salvage and deciding the best second-line treatment approach.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults: a retrospective, single-center case series.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis is rare in adults, and most of what we know about its diagnosis and treatment comes from pediatric studies. We report clinical findings and results of treatment in a retrospective series of 63 consecutive adult patients (18-76 years old), treated at our pediatric unit from 1990 to 2020 using the same approach as for children. Patients were classified as having single-system disease (SS-LCH) in 41 cases, which was unifocal in 34 of them and multifocal in 7, or multisystem disease (MS-LCH) in 17 and primary pulmonary (pLCH) in 5. Twenty patients also had diabetes insipidus. A "wait and see" strategy was recommended after biopsy/surgery for patients with unifocal SS-LCH. Systemic treatment was proposed for cases of SS-LCH involving "special sites" or with multifocal disease, and in cases of MS-LCH. EFS and OS for the cohort as a whole were 62.2% and 100%, respectively, at 5 years and 52.5% and 97.6% at 10 years. Three patients died due to the damage caused by the multiple therapies administered. The rate of disease reactivation was high (affecting 40% of cases), with several reactivations over the years despite multiple lines of treatment. Though clinical history of LCH may differ between adults and children, in the absence of specific, tailored protocols, clinical approach to adult cases may draw on pediatric experience. Patients with limited disease have a good prognosis without any need for systemic therapy. Potentially greater toxicity in adults of systemic treatments generally used in pediatric setting should be borne in mind.

Extraosseous Ewing sarcoma in children and adolescents: A retrospective series from a referral pediatric oncology center.

BACKGROUND: Extraosseous Ewing sarcoma is a rare entity and less is known about its clinical behavior and optimal treatment than for its counterpart in bone. This study is a retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients <21 years treated according to a "soft tissue sarcoma approach." METHODS: The "extraosseous" origin of the tumor was established on radiological findings, based on the lack of any bone involvement. Patients were treated using a multimodality approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. All patients received chemotherapy with alkylating agents and anthracyclines for 25 weeks (nine courses). Radiotherapy (45-54.8 Gy) was required for all cases except those who had an initial R0 resection of tumors smaller than 5 cm. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (age 2-20 years, median 14) were treated from 1990 to 2020. Ten-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 77.5% and 85.5% in patients with localized disease, and 11.1% and 29.6% in those with metastatic disease (p < .001) (follow-up 5-349 months, median 107 months). In patients with localized disease, the most recent IVADo-IVE regimen achieved excellent survivals, that is, 10-year EFS 95.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that satisfactory results were achieved in patients with localized extraosseous Ewing sarcoma treated with a tailored approach derived from soft tissue sarcoma protocols, which was less intensive and shorter as compared to the standards utilized for the management of bone Ewing sarcoma. Our study suggests that the extraskeletal site might be considered as a variable to stratify patients and modulate treatment intensity accordingly in Ewing sarcoma protocol.

Prolonged COVID-19 infection in a child with lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: which is the best management?

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, oncologists have managed patients at higher risk of having a severe course of this infection. This raises new questions about their correct management, as well as the difficulty of distinguishing tumor/treatments complications from those related to COVID-19. We report a case of an 11-year-old boy undergoing treatment for T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma who experienced a prolonged COVID-19 course. Oncologic therapy was continued without significant changes compared to the initially planned treatment. No relevant complications occurred. COVID-19 convalescent plasma was administered, resulting in a positive antibody titer after 24 days.

Children and adolescent solid tumours and high-intensity end-of-life care: what can be done to reduce acute care admissions?

Despite improvements in survival, cancer remains the leading cause of non-accidental death in children and adolescents, who risk receiving high-intensity end-of-life (HI-EOL) care. OBJECTIVE: To analyse treatments for relapses (particularly in the last weeks of life), assess their impact on the EOL, identify patients most likely to receive HI-EOL care and examine whether palliative care services can contain the intensity of EOL care. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients treated at the paediatric oncology unit of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori in Milan who died between 2018 and 2020. The primary outcome was HI-EOL care, defined as: ≥1 session of intravenous chemotherapy <14 days before death; ≥1 hospitalisation in intensive care in the last 30 days of life and ≥1 emergency room admission in the last 30 days of life. RESULTS: The study concerned 68 patients, and 17 had HI-EOL care. Patients given specific in-hospital treatments in the last 14 days of their life more frequently died in hospital. Those given aggressive EOL care were less likely to die at home or in the hospice. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours were more likely to have treatments requiring hospitalisation, and to receive HI-EOL care. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the importance of considering specific treatments at the EOL with caution. Treatments should be administered at home whenever possible.The early activation of palliative care, especially for fragile and complicated patients like those with CNS cancers, could help families cope with the many problems they face.

Front-Line Window Therapy with Temozolomide and Irinotecan in Patients with Primary Disseminated Multifocal Ewing Sarcoma: Results of the ISG/AIEOP EW-2 Study.

PURPOSE: The main objective was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of TEMIRI as a front-line treatment in primary disseminated Ewing sarcoma (PDMES) using the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The secondary objectives included the assessment of toxicity and the performance status/symptom changes. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2018, patients with PDMES received two courses of temozolomide 100 mg/sqm/day + irinotecan 50 mg/sqm/day for 5 days every 3 weeks as an amendment to the Italian Sarcoma Group/Associazione Italiana EmatoIogia ed Oncologia Pediatrica (ISG/AIEOP) EW-2 protocol (EUDRACT#2009-012353-37, Vers. 1.02). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 19 years (range 3-55). After TEMIRI, the RECIST response was as follows: a partial response in 20 (59%) patients, stable disease in 11 (32%), and disease progression in 3 (9%). The ECOG/Lansky score was improved in 25/34 (73.5%) cases, and a reduction or disappearance of pain was observed in 31/34 patients (91%). The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was 3%. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21% (95% CI 6-35%) and 36% (95% CI: 18-54%), respectively. CONCLUSION: the smooth handling and encouraging activity demonstrated by up-front TEMIRI did not change the EFS in PDMES, so this result suggests the need for the further evaluation of the efficacy of TEMIRI in combination with conventional treatments in non-metastatic patients.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for adolescents and young adult patients treated at a specialist pediatric oncology unit.

This brief report describes the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program at our pediatric oncology unit. Adopting Italian regulations, patients treated for cancer within the previous 6 months were offered vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine if aged ≥16 years, and with the Pfizer-BioNtech or Moderna vaccine if aged ≥18 years. From March 24 to April 28, 2021, 80/89 adolescent and young adult patients enrolled were vaccinated, while nine refused the vaccine due to fear of side effects, disbelief regarding the pandemic, or lack of trust in the scientific community. The refusal rate in our cohort was lower than in the Italian general population.

Whole Lung Irradiation after High-Dose Busulfan/Melphalan in Ewing Sarcoma with Lung Metastases: An Italian Sarcoma Group and Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica Joint Study.

PURPOSE: To analyze toxicity and outcome predictors in Ewing sarcoma patients with lung metastases treated with busulfan and melphalan (BU-MEL) followed by whole-lung irradiation (WLI). METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 lung metastatic Ewing Sarcoma patients who underwent WLI after BU-MEL with autologous stem cell transplantation, as part of two prospective and consecutive treatment protocols. WLI 12 Gy for <14 years old and 15 Gy for ≥14 years old patients were applied at least eight weeks after BU-MEL. Toxicity, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and pulmonary relapse-free survival (PRFS) were estimated and analyzed. RESULTS: After WLI, grade 1-2 and grade 3 clinical toxicity was reported in 16.2% and 5.9% patients, respectively. The five-year OS, EFS and PRFS with 95% confidence interval (CI) were 69.8% (57.1-79.3), 61.2% (48.4-71.7) and 70.5% (56.3-80.8), respectively. Patients with good histological necrosis of the primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed a significant decreased risk of pulmonary relapse or death compared to patients with poor histological necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: WLI at recommended doses and time interval after BU-MEL is feasible and might contribute to the disease control in Ewing sarcoma with lung metastases and responsive disease. Further studies are needed to explore the treatment stratification based on the histological response of the primary tumor.