Chymase in Plasma and Urine Extracellular Vesicles: Novel Biomarkers for Primary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising liquid biopsy for various diseases. For the first time, using plasma and urinary EVs, we assessed the activity of renin-angiotensin system (RAS), a central regulator of renal, cardiac, and vascular physiology, in patients with control (Group I) or uncontrolled (Group II) primary hypertension. METHODS: EVs were isolated from 34 patients with history of hypertension, and characterized for size and concentration by nanoparticle tracking analyses, exosomal biomarkers by immunogold labeling coupled with transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry and immunoblotting. EVs were analyzed for the hydrolytic activity of chymase, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), ACE2, and neprilysin (NEP) by HPLC. RESULTS: Plasma and urinary EVs were enriched for small EVs and expressed exosomal markers (CD63, CD9, and CD81). The size of urinary EVs (but not plasma EVs) was significantly larger in Group II compared to Group I. Differential activity of RAS enzymes was observed, with significantly higher chymase activity compared to ACE, ACE2, and NEP in plasma EVs. Similarly, urinary EVs exhibited higher chymase and NEP activity compared to ACE and ACE2 activity. Importantly, compared to Group I, significantly higher chymase activity was observed in urinary EVs (p = 0.03) from Group II, while no significant difference in activity was observed for other RAS enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: Bioactive RAS enzymes are present in plasma and urinary EVs. Detecting chymase in plasma and urinary EVs uncovers a novel mechanism of angiotensin II-forming enzyme and could also mediate cell-cell communication and modulate signaling pathways in recipient cells.

A Liquid Biopsy-Based Approach to Isolate and Characterize Adipose Tissue-Derived Extracellular Vesicles from Blood.

Obesity is a major risk factor for multiple chronic diseases. Anthropometric and imaging approaches are primarily used to assess adiposity, and there is a dearth of techniques to determine the changes in adipose tissue (AT) at the molecular level. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a novel and less invasive source of biomarkers for various pathologies. Furthermore, the possibility of enriching cell or tissue-specific EVs from the biofluids based on their unique surface markers has led to classifying these vesicles as "liquid biopsies", offering valuable molecular information on hard-to-access tissues. Here, we isolated small EVs from AT (sEVAT) of lean and diet-induced obese (DIO) mice, identified unique surface proteins on sEVAT by surface shaving followed by mass spectrometry, and developed a signature of five unique proteins. Using this signature, we pulled out sEVAT from the blood of mice and validated the specificity of isolated sEVAT by measuring the expression of adiponectin, 38 adipokines on an array, and several adipose tissue-related miRNAs. Furthermore, we provided evidence of sEV applicability in disease prediction by characterizing sEVAT from the blood of lean and DIO mice. Interestingly, sEVAT-DIO cargo showed a stronger pro-inflammatory effect on THP1 monocytes compared to sEVAT-Lean and a significant increase in obesity-associated miRNA expression. Equally important, sEVAT cargo revealed an obesity-associated aberrant amino acid metabolism that was subsequently validated in the corresponding AT. Lastly, we show a significant increase in inflammation-related molecules in sEVAT isolated from the blood of nondiabetic obese (>30 kg/m2) individuals. Overall, the present study offers a less-invasive approach to characterize AT.

Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral Blood Flow: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Antihypertensive treatments benefit cerebrovascular health and cognitive function in patients with hypertension, but it is uncertain whether an intensive blood pressure target leads to potentially harmful cerebral hypoperfusion. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control vs standard control with whole-brain cerebral blood flow (CBF). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This substudy of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of 2 different blood pressure-lowering strategies with longitudinal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including arterial spin labeled perfusion imaging to quantify CBF. A total of 1267 adults 50 years or older with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk but free of diabetes or dementia were screened for the SPRINT substudy from 6 sites in the US. Randomization began in November 2010 with final follow-up MRI in July 2016. Analyses were performed from September 2020 through December 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Study participants with baseline CBF measures were randomized to an intensive SBP target less than 120 mm Hg or standard SBP target less than 140 mm Hg. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in whole-brain CBF from baseline. Secondary outcomes were change in gray matter, white matter, and periventricular white matter CBF. RESULTS: Among 547 participants with CBF measured at baseline, the mean (SD) age was 67.5 (8.1) years and 219 (40.0%) were women; 315 completed follow-up MRI at a median (IQR) of 4.0 (3.7-4.1) years after randomization. Mean whole-brain CBF increased from 38.90 to 40.36 (difference, 1.46 [95% CI, 0.08-2.83]) mL/100 g/min in the intensive treatment group, with no mean increase in the standard treatment group (37.96 to 37.12; difference, -0.84 [95% CI, -2.30 to 0.61] mL/100 g/min; between-group difference, 2.30 [95% CI, 0.30-4.30; P = .02]). Gray, white, and periventricular white matter CBF showed similar changes. The association of intensive vs standard treatment with CBF was generally similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, chronic kidney disease, SBP, orthostatic hypotension, and frailty, with the exception of an indication of larger mean increases in CBF associated with intensive treatment among participants with a history of cardiovascular disease (interaction P = .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Intensive vs standard antihypertensive treatment was associated with increased, rather than decreased, cerebral perfusion, most notably in participants with a history of cardiovascular disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.

Newly developed radioimmunoassay for Human Angiotensin-(1-12) measurements in plasma and urine.

The dodecapeptide angiotensin-(1-12) [Ang-(1-12)] functions as an intracrine/paracrine substrate for local production of angiotensin II. We developed a reliable and specific radioimmunoassay (RIA) method for the measurement of Ang-(1-12) in human plasma and urine using an affinity purified antibody fraction directed towards the C-terminus of the human Ang-(1-12) sequence. The RIA method was applied to quantify the Ang-(1-12) in plasma and urine collected from thirty-four human subjects (29 treated with antihypertensive medicines and 5 untreated patients). Plasma Ang-(1-12) level was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in patients with systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg (n = 10) compared to the group with systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg (n = 24). No significant difference (P = 0.22) was found in spot urine between the groups. Our study also shows that the polyclonal antibody neutralizes the cleavage sites of the human Ang-(1-12) from recombinant human chymase (rhChymase) and serum angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) mediated Ang II generating hydrolysis. Overall, this newly developed RIA method is reliable and applicable to accurately quantify the Ang-(1-12) level in clinical samples (plasma and urine). Further, our in vitro neutralization study suggests that the anti-Ang-(1-12)-antibody might be used as an in vivo therapeutic agent for preventing Ang-(1-12)/Ang II-mediated hypertension and organ damage.

Effect of Febuxostat on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Subjects With Hyperuricemia and Hypertension: A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia is associated with hypertension, with elevated serum uric acid levels postulated to have a causal role in the development of hypertension. Consequently, serum uric acid reduction may help lower blood pressure (BP). A Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the potential BP-lowering effects of the xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat in subjects with hypertension and hyperuricemia (serum uric acid ≥0.42 mmol/L [≥7.0 mg/dL]). METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects (n=121) were randomized 1:1 to febuxostat 80 mg once daily or to placebo. The primary end point was change from baseline to Week 6 in 24-hour mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP). Additional end points included the following: change from baseline to Week 3 in 24-hour mean SBP and changes from baseline to Weeks 3 and 6 in 24-hour mean ambulatory diastolic BP, serum uric acid, mean daytime and nighttime ambulatory SBP/diastolic BP, and clinic SBP/diastolic BP. For the overall study population, there were no significant differences between febuxostat and placebo for changes from baseline to Weeks 3 or 6 in ambulatory, daytime or nighttime, or clinic SBP or diastolic BP. However, in a preplanned subgroup analysis, there was a significant decrease in SBP from baseline to Week 6 in subjects with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥90 mL/min) treated with febuxostat versus placebo; least squares mean difference, -6.7; 95% confidence interval -13.3 to -0.0; P=0.049. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that febuxostat may lower BP in hyperuricemic patients with hypertension and normal renal function; further studies should be conducted to confirm this finding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01496469.

Efficacy and safety of olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension not at goal with mono, dual or triple drug therapy: results of the CHAMPiOn study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of once daily olmesartan medoxomil (OM)/amlodipine besylate (AM)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 40/10/25 mg in patients with hypertension not at goal with mono, dual or triple drug therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, open-label, blinded-endpoint study. After a 1-week screening visit, 40 patients were enrolled into the study and given once daily treatment with OM/AM/HCTZ after the patients underwent baseline ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on their original therapy. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline in mean 24 h ABPM [systolic blood pressure (SBP)] after the first day of therapy with OM/AM/HCTZ 40/10/25 mg. Secondary endpoints were changes from baseline in mean 24 h ABPM [diastolic blood pressure (DBP)] after the first day of therapy with OM/AM/HCTZ 40/10/25 mg; mean changes from baseline in trough seated SBP (SeSBP) at day 1 and SeSBP at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4; mean changes from baseline in trough seated DBP (SeDBP) at day 1 and SeDBP at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4; and the percentage of subjects achieving mean 24 h, daytime and night-time ABPM BP goals. RESULTS: The baseline paired t-test systolic ABPM was 134.0 ± 2.77 mmHg and day 1 was 128.6 ± 2.47 mmHg with a treatment difference of -5.55 ± 1.3 mmHg (p<0.0001). At week 1, paired t-test ABPM SBP reduction was 117.7 ± 2.0 mmHg with a treatment difference of -16.5 ± 1.8 mmHg (p < 0.0001). At week 2, paired t-test ABPM SBP reduction was 115.8 ± 1.8 mmHg with a treatment difference of -18.4 ± 2.0 mmHg (p < 0.0001). At week 3, paired t-test ABPM SBP reduction was 115.5 ± 1.9 mmHg with a treatment difference of -18.6 ± 2.0 mmHg (p < 0.0001). At week 4, paired t-test ABPM SBP reduction was 115.5 ± 1.8 mmHg with a treatment difference of -18.6 ± 2.2 mmHg (p < 0.0001). The baseline paired t-test SeSBP was 142 ± 2.43 mmHg and day 1 was 132 ± 2.59 mmHg with a treatment difference of -9.78 ± 1.51 mmHg (p < 0.0001). At week 1, paired t-test SeSBP reduction was 124.0 ± 1.6 mmHg with a treatment difference of -17.9 ± 1.8 mmHg (p < 0.0001). At week 2, paired t-test SeSBP reduction was 120.3 ± 1.7 mmHg with a treatment difference of -21.5 ± 2.1 mmHg (p < 0.0001). At week 3, paired t-test SeSBP reduction was 118.5 ± 1.8 mmHg with a treatment difference of -23.3 ± 1.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001). At week 4, paired t-test SeSBP reduction was 119.6 ± 1.7 mmHg with a treatment difference of -22.2 ± 1.9 mmHg (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with OM/AM/HCTZ achieved superior (SBP) ABPM reductions compared with mono, dual or triple drug therapy, resulting in all patients achieving systolic ABPM goal without ABPM documented hypotension.

The effects of telmisartan and amlodipine in treatment-naïve and previously treated hypertensive patients: a subanalysis from a 4 × 4 factorial design study.

The subanalysis of a 4 × 4 factorial, 8-week study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan (T) 40-80 mg/amlodipine (A) 5-10 mg used in treatment-naïve patients (n = 231) and patients previously treated with antihypertensive agents (n = 880). Similar blood pressure (BP) reductions were achieved with T + A, regardless of their pretreatment status. Highest reductions were achieved with T80 + A10 (treatment-naïve -26.5/-18.2 mm Hg and previously treated -25.6/-19.9 mm Hg). Most patients (treatment-naïve 72.4% and previously treated 77.6%), including those with added risk, achieved BP goal (<140/90 mm Hg) with T80 + A10. Tolerability was comparable in both groups.

Efficacy/safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in naïve versus previously treated subjects with hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: A predefined exploratory analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, forced-titration study of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) versus losartan potassium (LOS) in subjects with hypertension not previously or previously treated with antihypertensive medication is reported. METHODS: The study included a 3-4-week placebo run-in and an 8-week active treatment period: OM (weeks 1-4, OM 20 mg; weeks 5-8, OM 40 mg); placebo + OM (weeks 1-2, placebo; weeks 3-4, OM 20 mg; weeks 5-8, OM 40 mg); and LOS (weeks 1-4, LOS 50 mg; weeks 5-8, LOS 100 mg). Analyses focused on comparison of OM and placebo + OM combined versus LOS. Efficacy endpoints were mean change from baseline in seated cuff diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) at week 8 (primary); seated cuff systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) at weeks 4 and 8, and SeDBP at week 4 (secondary), and BP target achievement (tertiary). RESULTS: The randomized population (n = 941) had a mean ± SD age of 51.9 ± 9.7 years, 54.5% were male, and 20.1% were naïve to antihypertensive medication. For treatmentnaïve subjects, baseline seated BP (SeBP) (±SD) was 157.4 (±10.9)/101.8 (±4.3) mmHg with OM and 156.3 (±10.8)/101.1 (±3.9) mmHg with LOS, while non-naïve subjects had 158.4 (±10.2)/100.9 (±4.0) mmHg with OM and 158.8 (±10.1)/101.3 (±4.2) mmHg with LOS. OM monotherapy produced significantly greater changes in least-squares mean (±SE) SeDBP compared with LOS in both treatment-naïve (-9.7 [1.0] vs. -6.6 [1.0] mmHg; P = 0.0232 vs. LOS) and non-naïve subjects (-9.6 [0.5] vs. -7.3 [0.5] mmHg; P = 0.0013 vs. LOS). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved the SeBP goal of <140/90 mmHg with OM compared with LOS in treatment-naïve (34.1% vs. 19.0%, respectively; P = 0.0109) and non-naïve subjects (31.0% vs. 19.6%; P = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Overall, OM monotherapy resulted in significantly greater SeBP reductions and greater SeBP goal achievement than LOS, irrespective of previous medication use. Both OM and LOS therapy were well tolerated.

A randomized, double-blind, forced-titration study to compare olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of once-daily olmesartan medoxomil (OM) and losartan potassium (LOS) in patients with hypertension. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, forced-titration study. After a 3-week placebo run-in, 941 patients were randomized in an 8:1:9 ratio to once-daily treatment with OM (20 mg for 4 weeks, then OM 40 mg for 4 weeks [n = 420]), placebo plus OM (placebo for 2 weeks, then OM 20 mg for 2 weeks and OM 40 mg for 4 weeks [n = 52]), or LOS (50 mg for 4 weeks, then LOS 100 mg for 4 weeks [n = 469]). A subset of 246 patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in trough seated cuff diastolic BP (SeDBP) at week 8. Secondary endpoints were mean changes from baseline in trough SeDBP at week 4 and seated systolic BP (SeSBP) at weeks 4 and 8. Tertiary endpoints included change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory BP at weeks 4 and 8 and percentage of patients achieving seated cuff BP (SeBP) goal of < 140/90 mm Hg and mean 24-hour ambulatory BP target of < 130/80 mm Hg at weeks 4 and 8. RESULTS: At week 8, least-squares (LS) mean (± standard error) SeDBP reductions from baseline were 9.7 ± 0.5 and 7.1 ± 0.5 mm Hg (treatment difference: -2.5 ± 0.6 mm Hg; P < 0.0001) and LS mean SeSBP reductions were 13.6 ± 0.7 and 9.7 ± 0.7 mm Hg (treatment difference: -3.9 ± 1.0 mm Hg; P = 0.0001) for OM versus LOS, respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving OM reached SeBP goal of < 140/90 mm Hg at week 8. There was a similar incidence of adverse events with OM and LOS. CONCLUSION: Treatment with low- and high-dose OM achieved superior SeBP reductions compared with low- and high-dose LOS, resulting in significantly more patients achieving SeBP goal, with similar tolerability.

Integrated control of hypertension by olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide and rationale for combination.

Hypertension affects nearly one-third of all individuals in the US, yet one-half of all treated patients achieve blood pressure (BP) controlled to recommended goals. The percentage of patients with uncontrolled BP is likely to be much higher when considering the number of patients who are not even aware of their hypertensive state. Elevated BP is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events and end-organ damage. Antihypertensive monotherapy is not always sufficient to achieve BP goals, and thus more aggressive treatment regimens need to be considered. Antihypertensive combination therapy, which may improve tolerability, offers the benefit of targeting different mechanisms of action. Numerous outcomes studies support the use of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor as a first-line choice in antihypertensive therapy. This review discusses the benefits of combination therapy with the angiotensin type II receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil (OM) paired with the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). The pharmacokinetic properties of OM will be reviewed in addition to efficacy studies that support OM + HCTZ combination therapy over other possible antihypertensive combinations. Finally, a rationale for choosing HCTZ over another diuretic, chlorthalidone, will also be discussed based on pharmacokinetic differences, clinical concerns, and trends in use.

Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide.

In at least 50% of patients with hypertension, particularly those with stage 2 hypertension, combination drug therapy is required to achieve the currently recommended blood pressure (BP) goals. It is likely that future hypertension guidelines will recommend lowering BP beyond the currently recommended systolic/diastolic BP goals of lower than 140/90 mmHg for all patients with hypertension and lower than 130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease. In a series of clinical trials, the combination of olmesartan medoxomil, a well-established angiotensin receptor blocker, and hydrochlorothiazide, a thiazide diuretic, has produced greater reductions in systolic BP and diastolic BP and greater proportions of patients achieving BP goals than monotherapy with either component. Additionally, the increased efficacy resulting from the combination with hydrochlorothiazide does not appear to significantly affect the tolerability profile of olmesartan medoxomil. This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of the chemistry, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of this combination and discusses its role in the management of hypertension.

Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST): psychometric properties of a new measure assessing flushing symptoms and clinical impact of niacin therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A common adverse effect of niacin therapy is flushing, manifested by cutaneous warmth, redness, itching and/or tingling. The Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) was developed to assess flushing symptoms and their impact on patients receiving niacin therapy. This study evaluated the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the FAST. The minimal important difference (MID) of the FAST was also examined. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group 8-week study conducted to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the FAST. The instrument is administered daily using an electronic patient diary. The study was conducted at 41 clinical sites in the US. 276 patients with dyslipidaemia were randomized to treatment and were at least 18 years of age, with fasting laboratory values of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <250 mg/dL and one of the following: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <40 mg/dL for males or <50 mg/dL for females; or triglycerides (TG) > or = 150 and < or = 400 mg/dL; or LDL-C > or = 70 mg/dL for patients with a history of coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents, or > or = 100 mg/dL for subjects with two risk factors, or > or = 160 mg/dL for subjects with 0-1 risk factors. Patients were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to receive niacin extended-release (NER) 500 mg/day in week 1, 1000 mg/day in week 2 and 2000 mg/day in weeks 3-6/aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]), NER/ASA placebo, or NER placebo/ASA placebo. RESULTS: FAST test-retest reliability in stable patients during the first 2 weeks was demonstrated for overall flushing severity using patient and physician overall treatment effect (OTE) ratings (intraclass correlation coefficients of >0.7 for mean overall and individual flushing severity scores). Over the 6-week treatment period, FAST scores demonstrated significant correlations with individual symptoms, impact on daily activities and sleep, and dissatisfaction related to flushing (p < 0.01). Changes in FAST scores were associated with treatment satisfaction (p < 0.01) and patient- and physician-rated OTE (p < 0.01). Using patient-rated OTE, the mean maximum flushing severity scores improved 1.85 points in responders and only 0.18 points in non-responders (p < 0.001); responders were defined by improved patient- or physician-rated OTE. Among patients with flushing, mean maximum overall flushing scores differed between patients who subsequently discontinued due to flushing (7.9 points) and those who did not discontinue (4.7 points; p < 0.001). The probable range in this study for a detectable change in flushing symptoms (MID) was 0.29-0.38 points for mean flushing severity and 0.66-0.86 points for maximum flushing severity. CONCLUSION: The FAST exhibited test-retest reliability, good evidence of construct validity, and, overall, flushing severity was responsive to change over time. The FAST is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the impact of niacin-induced flushing in patients with dyslipidaemia.

Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide compared with benazepril and amlodipine besylate.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with stage 2 hypertension require two or more antihypertensive agents in order to achieve the BP goals recommended in current treatment guidelines. Accordingly, combinations of two drugs with different mechanisms of antihypertensive action are widely used. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, multicenter 12-week study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a combination of olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with that of benazepril plus amlodipine besylate in patients with stage 2 hypertension. METHODS: Patients were eligible for randomization following a 3- to 4-week placebo run-in period if they had either (i) mean seated DBP>or=90 mm Hg but<115 mm Hg and mean seated SBP>or=160 mm Hg but <200 mm Hg, or (ii) mean seated DBP>or=100 mm Hg but<115 mm Hg. The difference in mean seated SBP measured on two separate visits during the run-in period was required to beor=95 mm Hg and<115 mm Hg or SBP>145 mm Hg and

Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan vs valsartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily for the treatment of hypertension.

To attain recent goals of blood pressure (BP) control, multiple drug therapy combinations are required, including higher doses of thiazide diuretics in combination with other classes of antihypertensive drug therapy. Thus, the authors evaluated the antihypertensive effects of telmisartan vs valsartan when combined with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg in a large (N=1066), placebo-controlled trial in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension. The primary end points were the changes from baseline in seated diastolic and systolic BP at the end of the 8-week treatment period. Safety end points included adverse events, changes in laboratory parameters, and pulse rate. Changes from baseline in BP following telmisartan-HCTZ (-24.0/-17.6 mm Hg) were significantly greater than both placebo (-4.4/-6.8 mm Hg) and valsartan-HCTZ (-21.2/-16.1 mm Hg) (vs placebo, P<.001 for systolic and diastolic BP; vs valsartan-HCTZ, P=.004 for systolic BP and P=.019 for diastolic BP). The total number of patients with at least 1 adverse event reported were similar among the 3 treatment groups (placebo, 49%; telmisartan-HCTZ, 43%; and valsartan-HCTZ, 38%). In conclusion, telmisartan-HCTZ at doses of 80/25 mg lowered both systolic and diastolic BP to a greater extent than valsartan-HCTZ at doses of 160/25 mg. These data support using a higher dose of a thiazide diuretic (25 mg) with a long-acting angiotensin receptor blocker as a useful strategy for improving hypertension control.

Metabolic issues in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Heart Attack Trial Study.

Based on the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack (ALLHAT) Trial, the Seventh Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) states that "thiazide-type diuretics should be used as initial therapy for most patients with hypertension." In the ALLHAT study, although there was no difference in the primary outcome for fatal heart attack and nonfatal myocardial infarction between all treatment groups, the manuscript endorses thiazide-type diuretics as first choice, based on their cardioprotective effects and low cost. It is well known that thiazide-type diuretics cause hypokalemia, glucose intolerance, and diabetes, although the ALLHAT study showed a significant 43% to 65% higher risk of new-onset diabetes with chlorthalidone compared with amlodipine (30%) and lisinopril (18%). The investigators justified the fact that the greater incidence of diabetes did not translate into more cardiovascular events. Such a conclusion ignores that the morbidity and mortality from diabetes manifests over decades and not the mere 2- to 6-year time frame examined in the ALLHAT study. It would appear that the strong endorsement of thiazide-type diuretics as first-line therapy by the JNC-7 will lead to a higher incidence of diabetes in these patients.