Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 76(1): 96-104, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27165179

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP)+dose-optimised methotrexate (MTX) versus placebo (PBO)+dose-optimised MTX in inducing and sustaining clinical remission in DMARD-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe, active, progressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with poor prognostic factors over 52 weeks. METHODS: DMARD-naïve patients with ≤1 year of active RA were randomised (3:1) in a double-blind manner to CZP (400 mg Weeks 0, 2, 4, then 200 mg Q2W to Week 52)+MTX or PBO+MTX (the mean optimised-MTX dose=21 and 22 mg/week, respectively). Sustained remission (sREM) and sustained low disease activity (sLDA; DAS28(ESR)<2.6 and DAS28(ESR)≤3.2, respectively, at both Weeks 40 and 52) were the primary and secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Patients were randomised to CZP+MTX (n=660) and PBO+MTX (n=219). At Week 52, significantly more patients assigned to CZP+MTX compared with PBO+MTX achieved sREM (28.9% vs 15.0%, p<0.001) and sLDA (43.8% vs 28.6%, p<0.001). Inhibition of radiographic progression and improvements in physical functioning were significantly greater for CZP+MTX versus PBO+MTX (van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS) mean absolute change from baseline (CFB): 0.2 vs 1.8, p<0.001, rate of mTSS non-progressors: 70.3% vs 49.7%, p<0.001; least squares (LS) mean CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): -1.00 vs -0.82, p<0.001). Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar between treatment groups. Infection was the most frequent AE, with higher incidence for CZP+MTX (71.8/100 patient-years (PY)) versus PBO+MTX (52.7/100 PY); the rate of serious infection was similar between CZP+MTX (3.3/100 PY) and PBO+MTX (3.7/100 PY). CONCLUSIONS: CZP+dose-optimised MTX treatment of DMARD-naïve early RA resulted in significantly more patients achieving sREM and sLDA, improved physical function and inhibited structural damage compared with PBO+dose-optimised MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01519791.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Certolizumab Pegol/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Certolizumab Pegol/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Radiografia , Indução de Remissão
3.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 74(5): 843-50, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24431394

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This 52-week, randomised, double-blind phase IIIb study assessed efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) as add-on therapy to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low to moderate disease activity, and stopping therapy in patients in sustained remission. METHODS: Patients were randomised 1:1 to CZP (400 mg at weeks 0, 2 and 4, then 200 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo (every 2 weeks) plus current non-biologic DMARDs. At week 24, patients who achieved the primary endpoint of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at both weeks 20 and 24 stopped study treatment and continued in the study until week 52. RESULTS: Of 194 patients (CZP=96; placebo=98), >90% had moderate disease activity at baseline. Significantly more CZP patients met the primary endpoint than placebo patients (week 20 and 24 CDAI remission rates: 18.8% vs 6.1%; p≤0.05). At week 24, 63.0% vs 29.7% of CZP versus placebo patients (p<0.001) achieved LDA. Disease activity score (ESR) based on 28-joint count and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission rates were also significantly higher with CZP versus placebo (19.8% vs 3.1%; p≤0.01 and 14.6% vs 4.1%; p≤0.05). CZP patients reported improvements in physical function versus placebo (mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability-Index change from baseline: CZP, -0.25 vs placebo, -0.03; p≤0.01). During the period following withdrawal of CZP or placebo, only 3/17 prior CZP patients and 2/6 prior placebo patients maintained CDAI remission until week 52, but CZP reinstitution allowed renewed improvement. Adverse and serious adverse event rates were comparable between CZP and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of CZP to non-biologic DMARDs is an effective treatment in RA patients with predominantly moderate disease activity, allowing low-disease activity or remission to be reached in a majority of the patients. However, the data suggest that CZP cannot be withdrawn in patients achieving remission. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00674362.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Certolizumab Pegol , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 74(1): 44-51, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24942382

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of certolizumab pegol (CZP) on productivity outside and within the home, and on participation in family, social and leisure activities in adult patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: RAPID-PsA (NCT01087788) is a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 409 patients with active PsA were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W). The arthritis-specific Work Productivity Survey (WPS) assessed the impact of PsA on paid work and household productivity, and participation in social activities during the preceding month. WPS responses were compared between treatment arms using a non-parametric bootstrap-t method. RESULTS: At baseline, 56.6%, 60.1% and 61.5% of placebo, CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W patients were employed. By week 24, employed CZP patients reported an average of 1.0-1.8 and 3.0-3.9 fewer days of absenteeism and presenteeism, respectively, per month compared with 1.0 and 0.3 fewer days for placebo patients (p<0.05). Within the home, by week 24, CZP patients reported an average of 3.0-3.5 household work days gained per month versus 1.0 day for placebo (p<0.05). CZP patients also reported fewer days with reduced household productivity or days lost for participation in family, social and leisure activities. Improvements with CZP were seen as early as week 4 and continued to week 24. CONCLUSIONS: CZP treatment significantly improved productivity at paid work and within the home, and resulted in greater participation in social activities for PsA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01087788.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Eficiência , Emprego , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Trabalho , Adulto , Certolizumab Pegol , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Atividades de Lazer , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Licença Médica , Participação Social , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 33(5): 541-50, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21223344

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Certolizumab pegol, administered either every 2 weeks (q2w) or q4w, maintains efficacy in patients previously failing on the anti-TNF agent infliximab (WELCOME study). AIM: To investigate the impact of certolizumab pegol administered q2w and q4w on work productivity and HRQoL in the WELCOME study. METHODS: Patients with loss of response to infliximab received open-label certolizumab pegol induction and were randomised to receive double-blind maintenance treatment with certolizumab pegol 400 mg either q4w or q2w through week 24, with a final evaluation at week 26. Work productivity and HRQoL were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:CD questionnaire and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire respectively. RESULTS: Baseline HRQoL burden was representative of moderately to severely active CD. HRQoL, daily activity and work productivity improved in both treatment groups as early as week 6 and were maintained through week 26. Treatment benefits to HRQoL, daily activity and work productivity were similar between the certolizumab pegol q2w vs. q4w groups. CONCLUSIONS: Certolizumab pegol therapy results in meaningful improvements in work productivity, daily activities and HRQoL in patients with active CD who previously responded to but either lost response or could not tolerate infliximab (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00308581).


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Certolizumab Pegol , Método Duplo-Cego , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...