Phenotypic Distinctions Between Omega-5-Gliadin Allergy and Peanut Allergy: Clinical Profile, Reaction Rates and Triggers, and Quality of Life.

Background: Different phenotypes of food allergy may exist, exhibiting distinct clinical features, and driven by different pathogenic mechanisms. We compared omega-5-gliadin (O5G) allergy to peanut allergy, focusing on clinical features, reaction rates and triggers, and quality of life (QOL). Methods: We surveyed adults with O5G allergy and peanut allergy regarding their diagnosis, co-morbidities, allergic reactions, and QOL measured by the FAQLQ-AF. Results: We received responses from 43/80 (54%) individuals with O5G allergy and 43/130 (33%) with peanut allergy. Compared to peanut allergic individuals, those with O5G allergy were older at age of onset (37.2 vs 2.5 years, p < 0.001), had fewer additional atopic conditions (0.88 vs 2.93, p < 0.001) or food allergies (0.15 vs 1.86, p < 0.001), and more frequent reactions before diagnosis (1.085 vs 0.29 per month, p < 0.05) Reaction rates improved in both groups following diagnosis. Reactions to peanut were more often triggered by accidental exposure (84% vs 26%, p < 0.001) and being away from home (65% vs 28%, p < 0.001), while reactions to O5G were more often due to deliberate ingestion (30% vs 9%, p < 0.05) or unexpected exercise (35% vs 2%, p < 0.001). Overall QOL score was similar between groups (4.2 in O5G allergy, 4.7 in peanut allergy, p = 0.12), but worse among women and those with additional food allergies. Conclusion: Phenotypic differences between O5G and peanut allergy support the development of different clinical approaches and the possibility of targeting distinct pathogenic mechanisms for prevention and treatment. Quality of life was impaired to a similar degree between groups.

Strongyloides infection as a reversible cause of chronic urticaria.

Recurrent urticaria is a frequent presenting complaint in the Allergy Clinic, despite the fact that chronic urticaria is not an IgE-mediated (atopic) condition in most cases. We present four cases assessed over 5 years in our allergy service who were found to have evidence of strongyloidiasis and whose clinical features resolved with standard anti-helminth treatment.

Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma.

BACKGROUND: Allergen specific immunotherapy has long been a controversial treatment for asthma. Although beneficial effects upon clinically relevant outcomes have been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials, there remains a risk of severe and sometimes fatal anaphylaxis. The recommendations of professional bodies have ranged from cautious acceptance to outright dismissal. With increasing interest in new allergen preparations and methods of delivery, we updated the systematic review of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register up to 2005, Dissertation Abstracts and Current Contents. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials using various forms of allergen specific immunotherapy to treat asthma and reporting at least one clinical outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently assessed eligibility of studies for inclusion. Two authors independently performed quality assessment of studies. MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-eight trials were included (13 new trials). There were 42 trials of immunotherapy for house mite allergy; 27 pollen allergy trials; 10 animal dander allergy trials; two Cladosporium mould allergy, two latex and six trials looking at multiple allergens. Concealment of allocation was assessed as clearly adequate in only 16 of these trials. Significant heterogeneity was present in a number of comparisons. Overall, there was a significant reduction in asthma symptoms and medication, and improvement in bronchial hyper-reactivity following immunotherapy. There was a significant improvement in asthma symptom scores (standardised mean difference -0.59, 95% confidence interval -0.83 to -0.35) and it would have been necessary to treat three patients (95% CI 3 to 5) with immunotherapy to avoid one deterioration in asthma symptoms. Overall it would have been necessary to treat four patients (95% CI 3 to 6) with immunotherapy to avoid one requiring increased medication. Allergen immunotherapy significantly reduced allergen specific bronchial hyper-reactivity, with some reduction in non-specific bronchial hyper-reactivity as well. There was no consistent effect on lung function. If 16 patients were treated with immunotherapy, one would be expected to develop a local adverse reaction. If nine patients were treated with immunotherapy, one would be expected to develop a systemic reaction (of any severity). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy reduces asthma symptoms and use of asthma medications and improves bronchial hyper-reactivity. One trial found that the size of the benefit is possibly comparable to inhaled steroids. The possibility of local or systemic adverse effects (such as anaphylaxis) must be considered.