Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 205(6): 636-41, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23332688

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This single-center, randomized trial compares the hemostatic effectiveness of microfibrillar collagen and oxidized cellulose in arterial bypass surgery. METHODS: In patients undergoing arterial bypass surgery, 2 hemostats, microfibrillar collagen and oxidized cellulose, were randomly used to achieve hemostasis. The primary endpoint was the time to hemostasis. The secondary endpoints were the complication rate, mortality, number of hemostats required, handling, and adhesion. RESULTS: Collagen achieved hemostasis significantly faster than cellulose, with considerably less hemostats. In addition, its ease of use was rated substantially better. CONCLUSION: In arterial bypass surgery, microfibrillar collagen is more effective than oxidized cellulose in achieving hemostasis.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Celulose Oxidada , Hemostasia Cirúrgica , Hemostáticos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Colágeno , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/cirurgia , Politetrafluoretileno , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA