A Neuropsychological Battery for the Evaluation of Dementia Among Mandarin-Speaking Older Adults in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Asians of Chinese origin are the largest single Asian origin group in the United States and are also the third largest group in Harris County, TX (i.e., the Houston metropolitan area). Mandarin speakers constitute the majority of the group. The linguistic gaps between Chinese (Mandarin) and English make it essential to use appropriate tests and normative data when working with the Mandarin-speaking population. Although it is ideal to develop original tests and/or normative data for Mandarin-speaking patients residing in the United States, the process can be lengthy. Although these indigenous tests are being developed, a neuropsychological battery with tests validated in Mandarin-speaking regions (e.g., Mainland China, Taiwan, and Singapore) can provide valuable information for Mandarin-speaking patients who identify with their home culture/country/region. METHODS: A systematic review of two electronic databases (PubMed and PsycInfo) was conducted. RESULTS: A neuropsychological battery to assess cognitive domains, including global intellectual function, attention/processing speed, executive function, visuospatial/visuoconstruction, language, learning and memory, and emotion, was developed. Cognitive screeners and performance validity measures were also included. The battery consists of core and supplementary measures validated in the Mandarin-speaking population. A case illustration is provided. CONCLUSION: Strengths and limitations of the battery and the role of interpretation in service delivery are discussed. The battery is recommended to clinicians for the evaluation of Mandarin-speaking older adults residing in the United States and other non-Mandarin-speaking regions where local norms are not available.

One Meaning for Two Persons: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Analysis of Meaning in Life, Anxiety, and Depression Among Rehabilitation Patients and Caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: Patients and caregivers in the inpatient physical rehabilitation setting are presented with life-changing medical conditions, and their meaning in life can change dramatically. Meaning in life is associated with fewer depressive and anxiety symptoms, but little is known about how they are related interdependently among patients and caregivers. In the current study, we aim to explore their dyadic relationships. DESIGN: Actor-partner interdependence model through structural equation modeling for dyadic analyses. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 160 pairs of patients and caregivers recruited from 6 inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in China. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted among pairs of rehabilitation patients and caregivers. The presence of and search for meaning were measured with the Meaning in Life Questionnaire. RESULTS: In 2 separate models, we found that patients' presence of meaning was negatively associated with their own depression (ß = -0.61, P < .001) and anxiety (ß = -0.55, P < .001), as well as their caregivers' depression (ß = -0.32, P < .001) and anxiety (ß = -0.31, P < .001). However, the caregivers' presence of meaning was only negatively associated with their own depression (ß = -0.25, P < .05) and anxiety (ß = -0.21, P < .05). A search for meaning was not significantly associated with depression or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results indicate that the anxiety and depressive symptoms of rehabilitation inpatients and caregivers are associated with their own level of presence of meaning. Caregivers' depression and anxiety are interdependently associated with patients' presence of meaning. Clinicians should take dyadic interdependence into consideration when providing psychological services to rehabilitate patients and their caregivers. Meaning-centered interventions can be helpful for the dyads' meaning-making and mental health.

Cross-cultural considerations for teleneuropsychology with Asian patients.

OBJECTIVE: Recent teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) models provide some degree of guidance in the application of telecommunication technologies toward the practice of neuropsychology. However, there remains a paucity of peer-reviewed data on TeleNP practices with culturally diverse patients, including Asian patients. This manuscript describes the challenges related to TeleNP practices with Asian patients and offers practical recommendations to complement existing TeleNP guidelines. METHOD: Based on extant literature on multicultural applications of neuropsychology, weprovide recommendations for TeleNP services with Asian patients that pertain to specific components of a TeleNP evaluation, such as a) pre-evaluation preparation, b) determining the appropriateness of the referral, c) determining language proficiency, d) working with interpreters, e) informed consent and confidentiality issues, f) conducting a culturally sensitive clinical interview, g) behavioral observations and communication, h) test selection, and i) interpreting data and writing reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our recommendations for TeleNP services with Asian patients highlight the need for flexibility to accommodate cultural differences and commitment to the complex nature of working with patients requiring interpretation services, while also recognizing the importance of preserving the validity of neuropsychological methods. Moving forward, it is imperative that the field of neuropsychology increases the training and accessibility of neuropsychologists who are knowledgeable in providing TeleNP services to Asian patients, and promotes research on the validation of TeleNP for Asian and other ethnic minority groups.

Normative Data for Adult Mandarin-Speaking Populations: A Systematic Review of Performance-Based Neuropsychological Instruments.

OBJECTIVES: Normative data are essential for neuropsychological evaluations, but they are scarce for Mandarin-speaking populations, despite Mandarin being the language with the most native speakers. Several normative data studies have been reported in recent years for Mandarin speakers, who reside in different countries/regions (e.g., mainland China, Taiwan, and Singapore, etc.). This review aims to serve as a reference guide to appropriate norms when working with a Mandarin-speaking patient and to guide future endeavors in test validation and development in areas where studies to date fall short. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review utilizing the PsycInfo, PubMed, and China Knowledge Resource Integrated databases as well as additional literature search through citations. We performed evaluations of the existing norms based on their test selection, cognitive domains covered, sample size, language, regions of participant recruitment, stratification by age/gender/education levels, and reporting of other psychometric properties. We focused on articles that included performance-based tests for adults but excluded those with purely clinical norms or from commercial publishers. RESULTS: We reviewed 1155 articles found through literature search and identified 43 articles reporting normative data for this population that met our inclusion criteria. Sixty-five distinctive tests and 127 versions were covered. The results are presented within two detailed tables organized by articles and tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We discussed the strengths and limitations of these normative reports. Practitioners are recommended to utilize normative data that most closely approximate a test-taker's cultural and demographic backgrounds. Limitations of the current review are also discussed.