Mechanism for the restoration of degraded typical steppe by nitrogen and phosphorus co-addition.

The reduction of soil nutrient content is one of the major reasons caused grassland degradation in China. Nutrient addition is thus considered as an effective measure for the restoration of degraded grasslands. However, over-fertilization can lead to decrease in plant diversity. To clarify the appropriate amount of nutrient addition and the underlying mechanism that promotes grassland restoration, we set up a nitrogen and phosphorus co-addition experiment in a degraded typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, and examined the responses at community, functional group and species levels to nutrient addition. The results showed that nutrient addition enhanced biomass while did not reduce species richness at the community level. The biomass showed a saturation response with the increases of nutrient addition, which approached saturation under the 12.0 g N·m-2, 3.8 g P·m-2 treatment. Species richness increased significantly under the lower nutrient treatments (N <9.6 g·m-2, P < 3.0 g·m-2) compared with the control, while the two high nutrient treatments did not alter species richness. At the functional group level, biomass and abundance of perennial rhizome grasses increased significantly with the increases of nutrient addition levels. Biomass and density of annuals increased significantly under high nutrient addition levels. However, the abundance and biomass of perennial bunchgrasses and perennial forbs were rarely affected. At the species level, six target species responded differently to nutrient addition. Biomass of Leymus chinensis was significantly increased due to the increase of population density and individual biomass. Biomass of Stipa grandis, Agropyron cristatum and Cleistogenes squarrosa change little. Biomass of Potentilla acaulis and Carex korshinskyi were reduced due to the decreases in individual biomass and population density, respectively. As a measure of restoring degraded grassland, nutrient addition could significantly increase biomass and species diversity, decrease biomass of the degradation indicator species, and increase biomass of perennial rhizomes grasses.

Accelerated rehabilitation combined with enteral nutrition in the management of lung cancer surgery patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of accelerated rehabilitation combined with enteral nutrition on surgically treated lung cancer patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: In total, 150 lung cancer patients treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Sixty-six patients were randomly divided into a control group with conventional nutrition (Con group) and an accelerated rehabilitation combined with enteral nutrition group (EN group). Postoperative drainage; total hospitalization time; total hospitalization expenses; and albumin, haemoglobin and total lymphocyte counts (TLC) before and after treatment were compared. RESULTS: The serum albumin, prealbumin and haemoglobin in both groups were decreased after operation and were significantly higher in the EN group (p<0.05) than in the Con group. The TLC decreased in both groups after operation and were significantly higher in the EN group than in the con group. The postoperative drainage volume, total hospitalization time and total hospitalization expenses were significantly lower in the EN group than in the Con group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of accelerated rehabilitation combined with enteral nutrition in lung cancer surgery patients is clear. Surgery leads to stress, which enhances catabolism and reduces the synthesis of carbohydrates, protein, and fat, increasing patients' nutritional risk. Nutritional support combined with fast-track minimally invasive thoracic surgery for at-risk lung cancer patients who undergo preoperative nutritional screening and assessment can reduce postoperative complications and hospitalization time and improve nutritional indicators, immunity, respiratory function recovery and clinical outcomes, leading to socioeconomic benefits.