Preemptive inotuzumab ozogamicin eradicated measurable residual disease in Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapsed post CD19 CART therapy.

There are no reports of application of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) for the treatment of MRD in r/r B-ALL. We firstly report the efficacy of InO for a patient experienced morphological relapse after HSCT and molecular relapse after CART therapy.

Case Report: Blinatumomab therapy for the treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with central nervous system infiltration.

The treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with central nervous system (CNS) involvement poses a significant clinical challenge because most chemotherapeutic agents exhibit weak permeability to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). In addition, current anti-CNS leukemia treatments often bring short or long-term complications. Immunotherapy including chimeric antigen T-cell therapy and bispecific antibody have shown profound treatment responses in relapsed/refractory B-ALL. However, there is a lack of data on the efficacy of bispecific antibody in treating B-ALL with CNS involvement. Here, we report two ALL patients with CNS leukemia who received blinatumomab. Case 1 was diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast phase. The patient developed CNS leukemia and bone marrow relapse during the treatment with dasatinib. Case 2 was diagnosed with B-ALL and suffered early hematologic relapse and cerebral parenchyma involvement. After treatment with one cycle of blinatumomab, both patients achieved complete remission in the bone marrow and CNS. Furthermore, this is the first report on the efficacy of blinatumomab in treating CNS leukemia with both of the cerebral spinal fluid and the cerebral parenchymal involvement. Our results suggest that blinatumomab might be a potential option for the treatment of CNS leukemia.

Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell consolidation therapy combined with CD19+ feeding T cells and TKI for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We conducted a single-arm, open-label, single-center phase 1 study to assess the safety and efficacy of multicycle-sequential anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in combination with autologous CD19+ feeding T cells (FTCs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as consolidation therapy in patients under the age of 65 years with de novo Ph-positive CD19+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Participants were given induction chemotherapy as well as systemic chemotherapy with TKI. Afterward, they received a single cycle of CD19 CAR T-cell infusion and another 3 cycles of CD19 CAR T-cell and CD19+ FTC infusions, followed by TKI as consolidation therapy. CD19+ FTCs were given at 3 different doses. The phase 1 results of the first 15 patients, including 2 withdrawals, are presented. The most common adverse events were cytopenia (13/13) and hypogammaglobinemia (12/13). There was no incidence of cytokine release syndrome above grade 2 or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome or grade 4 nonhematological toxicities. All 13 patients achieved complete remission, including 12 patients with a complete molecular response (CMR) at the data cutoff. The relapse-free survival was 84%, and the overall survival was 83% with a median follow-up of 27 months. The total number of CD19-expressing cells decreased with an increasing CMR rate. CD19 CAR T cells survived for up to 40 months, whereas CD19+ FTCs vanished in 8 patients 3 months after the last infusion. These findings could form the basis for the development of an allo-HSCT-free consolidation paradigm. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03984968.

A Phase II Trial of the Double Epigenetic Priming Regimen Including Chidamide and Decitabine for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of chidamide, decitabine plus priming regimen in the salvage treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: A clinical trial was conducted in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients using chidamide, decitabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, termed CDIAG, a double epigenetic priming regimen. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were recruited. Three patients received 2 treatment cycles. In 32 evaluable patients and 35 treatment courses, the completed remission rate (CRR) was 42.9%. The median OS time was 11.7 months. The median OS times of responders were 18.4 months, while those of nonresponders were 7.4 months (P = 0.015). The presence of RUNX1 mutations was associated with a high CRR but a short 2-year OS (P = 0.023) and PFS (P = 0.018) due to relapse after treatment. The presence of IDH mutations had no effect on the remission rate (80.0% vs. 73.3%), but showed a better OS (2-year OS rate: 100.0% vs. 28.9%). Grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse events included pneumonia, hematosepsis, febrile neutropenia, skin and soft tissue infection and others. CONCLUSION: The double epigenetic priming regimen (CDIAG regimen) showed considerably good antileukemia activity in these patients. Adverse events were acceptable according to previous experience. The study was registered as a clinical trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier:NCT03985007.

MYC-regulated lncRNA NEAT1 promotes B cell proliferation and lymphomagenesis via the miR-34b-5p-GLI1 pathway in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: LncRNA NEAT1 has been identified as a tumour driver in many human cancers. However, the underlying mechanism of lncRNA NEAT1 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) progression is unclear. METHODS: The expression levels of NEAT1, GLI1 and miR-34b-5p were detected by RT-qPCR and Western blotting in DLBCL tissues and cell lines. MTT and colony formation assays were performed to examine cell proliferation, while annexin-V staining and TUNEL assays were performed to measure cell apoptosis. The effect of NEAT1, GLI1 and miR-34b-5p on cell cycle-associated proteins was evaluated by Western blotting. Dual-luciferase reporter and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays were employed to investigate the interaction between NEAT1 and miR-34b-5p or GLI1 and miR-34b-5p. Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed to demonstrate the interaction between MYC and NEAT1. RESULTS: NEAT1 and GLI1 were upregulated while miR-34b-5p was downregulated in DLBCL tissues and cell lines compared to normal controls. Knockdown of NEAT1 or overexpression of miR-34b-5p inhibited cell proliferation but promoted cell apoptosis. Overexpression of NEAT1 reversed GLI1-knockdown induced attenuation of cell proliferation. In other words, NEAT1 acted as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA), regulating the miR-34b-5p-GLI1 axis, further affecting the proliferation of DLBCL. Moreover, MYC modulated NEAT1 transcription by directly binding to the NEAT1 promoter. CONCLUSION: We revealed that MYC-regulated NEAT1 promoted DLBCL proliferation via the miR-34b-5p-GLI1 pathway, which could provide a novel therapeutic target for DLBCL.