Dental adhesive microtensile bond strength following a biofilm-based in vitro aging model.

OBJECTIVE: Laboratory tests are routinely used to test bonding properties of dental adhesives. Various aging methods that simulate the oral environment are used to complement these tests for assessment of adhesive bond durability. However, most of these methods challenge hydrolytic and mechanical stability of the adhesive- enamel/dentin interface, and not the biostability of dental adhesives. To compare resin-dentin microtensile bond strength (µTBS) after a 15-day Streptococcus mutans (SM) or Streptococcus sobrinus (SS) bacterial exposure to the 6-month water storage (WS) ISO 11405 type 3 test. METHODOLOGY: A total of 31 molars were flattened and their exposed dentin was restored with Optibond-FL adhesive system and Z-100 dental composite. Each restored molar was sectioned and trimmed into four dumbbell-shaped specimens, and randomly distributed based on the following aging conditions: A) 6 months of WS (n=31), B) 5.5 months of WS + 15 days of a SM-biofilm challenge (n=31), C) 15 days of a SM-biofilm challenge (n=31) and D) 15 days of a SS-biofilm challenge (n=31). µTBS were determined and the failure modes were classified using light microscopy. RESULTS: Statistical analyses showed that each type of aging condition affected µTBS (p<0.0001). For Group A (49.7±15.5MPa), the mean µTBS was significantly greater than in Groups B (19.3±6.3MPa), C (19.9±5.9MPa) and D (23.6±7.9MPa). For Group D, the mean µTBS was also significantly greater than for Groups B and C, but no difference was observed between Groups B and C. CONCLUSION: A Streptococcus mutans- or Streptococcus sobrinus-based biofilm challenge for 15 days resulted in a significantly lower µTBS than did the ISO 11405 recommended 6 months of water storage. This type of biofilm-based aging model seems to be a practical method for testing biostability of resin-dentin bonding.

Dental adhesive microtensile bond strength following a biofilm-based in vitro aging model

Abstract Laboratory tests are routinely used to test bonding properties of dental adhesives. Various aging methods that simulate the oral environment are used to complement these tests for assessment of adhesive bond durability. However, most of these methods challenge hydrolytic and mechanical stability of the adhesive- enamel/dentin interface, and not the biostability of dental adhesives. Objective To compare resin-dentin microtensile bond strength (μTBS) after a 15-day Streptococcus mutans (SM) or Streptococcus sobrinus (SS) bacterial exposure to the 6-month water storage (WS) ISO 11405 type 3 test. Methodology A total of 31 molars were flattened and their exposed dentin was restored with Optibond-FL adhesive system and Z-100 dental composite. Each restored molar was sectioned and trimmed into four dumbbell-shaped specimens, and randomly distributed based on the following aging conditions: A) 6 months of WS (n=31), B) 5.5 months of WS + 15 days of a SM-biofilm challenge (n=31), C) 15 days of a SM-biofilm challenge (n=31) and D) 15 days of a SS-biofilm challenge (n=31). μTBS were determined and the failure modes were classified using light microscopy. Results Statistical analyses showed that each type of aging condition affected μTBS (p<0.0001). For Group A (49.7±15.5MPa), the mean μTBS was significantly greater than in Groups B (19.3±6.3MPa), C (19.9±5.9MPa) and D (23.6±7.9MPa). For Group D, the mean μTBS was also significantly greater than for Groups B and C, but no difference was observed between Groups B and C. Conclusion A Streptococcus mutans- or Streptococcus sobrinus-based biofilm challenge for 15 days resulted in a significantly lower μTBS than did the ISO 11405 recommended 6 months of water storage. This type of biofilm-based aging model seems to be a practical method for testing biostability of resin-dentin bonding.

Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses.

OBJECTIVES: Innumerous modifications have been proposed for the microtensile test since its introduction; however, testing parameters are not often well described and wide variations in bond strength are commonly reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the test specimen's gripping device, specimen geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode, and stress distribution when using an etch-and-rinse 2-step adhesive system bonded to human dentin. METHODS: Resin-based composite bonded to occlusal dentin from 21 human molars was used to fabricate dumbbell- and stick-shaped test specimens which were divided into three groups: Di - dumbbell-specimens placed in a Dircks device; GeS - stick-specimens gripped in a Geraldeli's device with Superglue; GeZ - stick-specimens gripped in a Geraldeli's device with Zapit. Specimens were tested to failure in tensile mode and the failure mode was examined under stereomicroscopy and fracture initiation sites were verified by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Three-dimensional models of each device/specimen were created and finite element calculations were performed. RESULTS: The effect of the gripping devices on the bond strength was not significant, unless the bond test areas were normalized. The failure mode was influenced by the type of device. Dircks device was less sensitive to human error than Geraldeli's, and produced a more uniform stress distribution at the dumbbell specimen adhesive layer than did the Geraldeli's device at the stick layer. SIGNIFICANCE: Microtensile testing parameters can directly influence the results and consequently inter-study comparisons.

Finite element analysis and bond strength of a glass post to intraradicular dentin: comparison between microtensile and push-out tests.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that the stress distribution and bond strength of glass posts to intraradicular dentin is influenced by the mechanical testing methodology. METHODS: Thirty single rooted endodontically treated teeth were prepared for luting of tapered fiber-glass posts (Reforpost, Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) with a conventional adhesive system and resin luting cement (Adper Scotchbond Multi-purpose, Rely X ARC, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). The teeth were randomly divided (n=10 per group) into micro-push-out (Mpo), hourglass- (Mh) and rectangular stick-shaped (Ms) microtensile testing groups before sectioning each root into five 1-mm-thick specimens. During specimen preparation for microTBS testing 46/50 stick and 4/50 hourglass specimens prematurely failed; therefore, the Ms group could not be included in the mechanical testing. The remaining specimens were tested at 0.5 mm/min until bond failure. Stress distribution within each specimen type for the three mechanical test methods was analyzed by finite element analysis (FEA). Qualitative analyses were carried out through Von Mises, XY and Sy criterion. RESULTS: Mpo and Mh had a mean microTBS of 11.89+/-6.55 and 14.98+/-12.72 MPa, respectively, which was not significantly different (p=0.1311). The push-out test demonstrated a more homogenous stress distribution by FEA and less variability in mechanical testing. SIGNIFICANCE: Therefore, the recommended testing method for determining the bond strength of glass posts to intraradicular dentin is by Mpo.