Cutaneous toxicity from epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: would a subcutaneous desensitization be helpful? Case report.

PURPOSE: Cetuximab and panitumumab are monoclonal antibody inhibitors that bind the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) currently used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The main adverse event related to EGFR inhibitors (EGFR-Is) is cutaneous toxicity, which can cause dosage reduction and interruption of treatment. State-of-the-art management of skin toxicity associated with EGFR-Is therapy involves the topical administration of corticosteroids and oral antibiotics, but is not completely effective in the management of toxicity. Subcutaneous desensitization with increasing concentrations of monoclonal antibodies can induce a tolerance to drug administration and reduce cutaneous adverse effects. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which a reduction or a disappearance of skin toxicity caused by EGFR-Is through subcutaneous desensitization has been achieved. CASE REPORT: We present cases of 2 Caucasian patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon treated with EGFR-Is who developed severe cutaneous toxicity. A 73-year-old man presented grade 4 skin toxicity of the face and grade 3 skin toxicity of the trunk during treatment with cetuximab. A 68-year-old woman developed G2 rash on the face after the first administration of cetuximab. These patients underwent subcutaneous desensitization with increasing concentrations of EGFR-Is. After this procedure, patients restarted therapy at the optimal dosage with reduction or disappearance of skin toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These cases suggest that by giving rising doses of antibody it is possible to obtain desensitization able to prevent severe cutaneous adverse events in patients treated with EGFR-Is.

Colon cancer.

Colon cancer is one of the leading tumours in the world and it is considered among the big killers, together with lung, prostate and breast cancer. In the recent years very important advances occurred in the field of treatment of this frequent disease: adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be effective, chiefly in stage III patients, and surgery was optimized in order to achieve the best results with a low morbidity. Several new target-oriented drugs are under evaluation and some of them (cetuximab and bevacizumab) have already exhibited a good activity/efficacy, mainly in combination with chemotherapy. The development of updated recommendations for the best management of these patients is crucial in order to obtain the best results, not only in clinical research but also in every-day practice. This report summarizes the most important achievements in this field and provides the readers useful suggestions for their professional practice.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) correlates with clinical activity of irinotecan-cetuximab in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a fluorescence in situ (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) analysis.

BACKGROUND: K-RAS wild type colorectal tumors show an improved response rate to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Nevertheless 70% to 40% of these patients still does not seem to benefit from this therapeutic approach. FISH EGFR GCN has been previously demonstrated to correlate with clinical outcome of colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. CISH also seemed able to provide accurate EGFR GCN information with the advantage of a simpler and reproducible technique involving immunohistochemistry and light microscopy. Based on these findings we investigated the correlation between both FISH and CISH EGFR GCN and clinical outcome in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-cetuximab. METHODS: Patients with advanced K-RAS wild-type, colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan-cetuximab after failure of irinotecan-based chemotherapy were eligible. A cut-off value for EGFR GCN of 2.6 and 2.12 for FISH and CISH respectively was derived from ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were available for analysis. We observed a partial remission in 9 (60%) and 2 (9%) cases with a FISH EGFR GCN >or= 2.6 and < 2.6 respectively (p = 0.002) and in 10 (36%) and 1 (6%) cases with a CISH EGFR GCN >or= 2.12 and < 2.12 respectively (p = 0.03). Median TTP was 7.7 and 6.4 months in patients showing increased FISH and CISH EGFR GCN whereas it was 2.9 and 3.1 months in those with low FISH and CISH EGFR GCN (p = 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSION: FISH and CISH EGFR GCN may both represent effective tools for a further patients selection in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Epidermal growth factor receptor gene promoter methylation in primary colorectal tumors and corresponding metastatic sites: a new perspective for an "old" therapeutic target.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) promoter methylation in primary colorectal cancers and corresponding metastases and its relationship to EGFR expression. STUDY DESIGN: Formalin-fixed tumor samples (primary site and metastasis)from colorectal cancer patients were analyzed for EGFR promoter methylation and EGFR immunohistochemistry expression. RESULTS: Among the 63 assessable patients, 25 cases (39.7%) showed EGFR promoter methylation. Forty-two primary colorectal tumors and corresponding metastases were available for paired analysis of EGFR methylation status. EGFR methylation status of the primary tumor was in accordance with that of metastasis in 29 patients (69%). In contrast, 7 patients (50%) with EGFR promoter methylation in the primary tumor showed unmethylated EGFR in metastasis, and 6 metastases (46%) showed EGFR promoter hypermethylation derived from unmethylated EGFR primary tumors. Lack of EGFR protein expression was observed in 8 EGFR promoter methylated primary tumors (44%) and in 7 EGFR promoter methylated metastatic sites (44%). CONCLUSION: EGFR promoter hypermethylation does not seem to represent a rare event in colorectal cancer and may be present differently in different tumor sites. These findings may be relevant to further studies investigating the role of EGFR in colorectal cancer patients.

Nuclear factor-kB tumor expression predicts response and survival in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab-irinotecan therapy.

PURPOSE: NF-kB expression has been shown to be responsible for resistance to antineoplastic agents and it also plays a part in the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor downstream signaling pathway in colorectal tumors. The aim of our analysis was to investigate a correlation between NF-kB expression, response rate, time to progression, and survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving cetuximab and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively the immunoreactivity for NF-kB in irinotecan-refractory patients receiving cetuximab and irinotecan. Results Seventy-six patients were analyzed. Cetuximab and irinotecan were administered as second-line chemotherapy in 19 patients and after > or = two lines of chemotherapy in the remaining 57 patients. We observed a partial response (PR) in 16 patients for an overall response rate of 24%. Thirty-two patients (48%) experienced progressive disease; median time to progression (TTP) was 3.6 months and median overall survival was 10.3 months. NF-kB was positive in 46 patients (60%). All main clinical characteristics were well balanced between NF-kB-positive and NF-kB-negative patients. The response rate was 10% (four PRs) versus 48% (12 PRs; P = .0007) in NF-kB-positive and NF-kB-negative tumors, respectively. Median TTP in NF-kB-positive patients was 3 v 6.4 months in the remaining patients (P = .021). Median overall survival was 9.5 v 15.8 months for NF-kB-positive and NF-kB-negative patients, respectively (P = .036) CONCLUSION: The difference in median TTP, overall survival, and response rate seem to confirm that NF-kB may play a crucial role in predicting the efficacy of cetuximab and irinotecan in advanced colorectal tumors.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common type of cancer in industrialized countries. Despite improved resection procedures and optimized adjuvant chemotherapy, local or distant recurrences occur in 22-25% of patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Approximately 30% of patients have advanced disease at presentation. The liver is the most common site of colorectal metastases and, interestingly, 20-30% of patients with colorectal cancer have liver-only metastases. The combined modality of chemotherapy and surgery increases overall survival and the chance of cure for metastatic patients, even if there is no agreement in terms of the best schedule and how long the treatment must last. In this paper, we review the role and the rationale of neoadjuvant chemotherapy within a multimodal approach, and discuss remaining questions and future directions.