Active periodic electrograms in remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients: the PREMS study.

AIMS: Remote monitoring (RM) is considered as a standard of care for pacemaker recipients. Remote monitoring systems provide calendar-based intracardiac electrogram recordings (IEGM) only with the current pacemaker settings (passive IEGM). PREMS (Pacemaker Remote Electrogram Monitoring Study), an observational, multicentre trial, prospectively evaluated the clinical value of an active IEGM (aIEGM), including three 10-s sections (passive IEGM, encouraged sensing, and encouraged pacing), compared to other RM data and to its passive IEGM section. Secondary objectives included the added value of the aIEGM to fully assess the sensing and pacing functions of each lead. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were enrolled within 3 months after pacemaker implantation and followed until the first transmitted aIEGM, which was analysed together with all other RM data. In total, 567 patients were enrolled (79 ± 9 years, 62% men, 19% single-chamber, and 81% dual-chamber pacemakers). Of 547 aIEGMs transmitted in 547 patients, 161 [29.4%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 25.6-33.3%] indicated at least one anomaly non-detectable with certainty-or at all-on other RM data, including atrial arrhythmia, extrasystoles, undersensing, oversensing, and loss of capture. In 21.7% of cases the detected events deserved a corrective action. The sensing and pacing function of each lead could be fully assessed in 77.3% of aIEGM (95% CI 72.6-82.0%) vs. 15.5% (95% CI 11.4-19.6%) when considering only the passive IEGM section (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An active IEGM improves the clinical value of remote pacemaker follow-up. Furthermore, compared to a passive IEGM, the aIEGM increases the capability to fully assess remotely the sensing and pacing functions.

Extraction Of Transvenous ICD Leads In An Over-ninety Years Old Patient.

There is a general consensus that once a part of an implanted cardiac device becomes infected, it is usually impossible to cure the infection without completely removing all prosthetic material from the body. Consequently the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) included the pocket infection or erosion as a class I indication for pacemaker lead exctraction. However, the procedure still carries a high risk of life-threatening complications due to fibrotic attachments between leads, veins, valves or other endocardial structures, notwithstanding specific tools and techniques that have been developed to assist the lead removal, preventing tissue laceration.

Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to assess the safety, feasibility, and diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) of unknown etiology. BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography is an appropriate noninvasive tool for coronary artery disease (CAD) detection, particularly in patients with low probability of the disease, such as patients with DCM of unknown origin. METHODS: We studied 61 unknown origin DCM patients (ejection fraction: 33.9 +/- 8.6%, group 1) and 139 patients with normal cardiac function with indications for coronary angiography (group 2, control population). All underwent coronary MDCT and angiography. Multidetector computed tomography images were acquired by light speed 16-slice computed tomography. The degree of stenosis was estimated in 15 coronary artery segments according to the American Heart Association model. RESULTS: In group 1, no MDCT-related complications were found, while 10 complications were associated with conventional angiography (p = 0.001). Overall feasibility of coronary artery visualization was 97.2% (863 of 888 segments). The most frequent cause of artifacts was interference from a hypertrophic cardiac venous system (10 artifacts, 40%). In group 2, overall feasibility was 96.1% (p = NS vs. group 1). In group 1, all cases with normal (44 cases) or pathological (17 cases) coronary arteries by conventional coronary angiography were correctly detected by MDCT, with, in 1 case, disparity of stenosis severity. In group 1, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MDCT for the identification of >50% stenosis were 99%, 96.2%, 81.2%, and 99.8%, respectively. In group 2, sensitivity and negative predictive values were lower than in group 1 (86.1% vs. 99% and 96.4% vs. 99.8%, respectively); specificity (96.4%) and positive predictive value (86.1%) were not significantly different versus group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector computed tomography is feasible, safe, and accurate for identification of idiopathic versus ischemic DCM, and may represent an alternative to coronary angiography.

Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary (MDCT) angiography applied to an unselected heart-disease population, to identify all causes of unfeasibility of exams, the distribution of artifacts in every coronary segment and their influence on diagnostic accuracy of examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 500 patients with different indications for invasive coronary angiography. All underwent coronary MDCT and ICA. 215 patients were pre-treated with metoprolol intravenously. In the whole population we studied native coronary arteries and in 141 cases the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). The quality of MDCT images was graded as good, sufficient and insufficient. RESULTS: We were able to evaluate the patency of all grafts, with the exception of 4 cases. Diagnostic accuracy of CABG evaluation was very high (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.4%). In native coronary arteries the overall feasibility was 97.9%. The middle left circumflex artery, right coronary artery and posterior descending artery were the segments most often poorly visualized. The first cause of artifacts was misalignment related to high heart rate, followed by premature heart beats and calcified plaque. The population was separated into 3 groups: group 1: heart rate <55 bpm, group 2: 55-65 bpm, group 3: >65 bpm. In group 1, misalignment was significantly lower than in groups 2 and 3. On a segment-based analysis, overall feasibility was therefore significantly higher in group 1 vs group 2 and vs group 3. Images of good quality were significantly higher in group 1 (95.4%) than in group 2 (87%) and group 3 (71.8%). The higher image quality in group 1 impacts on the overall diagnostic accuracy of the exam. Indeed overall sensitivity is significantly higher in group 1 (89.5%) than in group 2 (86%) and group 3 (82.8%) and overall specificity is significantly higher in group 1 than in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector computed tomography has a high feasibility and diagnostic accuracy for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in an unselected population. Good patient preparation (optimized beta-blocker therapy, correct breathing instructions) is essential for evaluating native coronary arteries while preparation with a beta-blocker is less relevant in bypass graft patients.

Comparison of feasibility and accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography versus computed tomography in patients with known ascending aortic aneurysm.

Aortic valve diseases, hypertension, and connective tissue disorders may be causes of ascending aortic aneurysms. Aortic enlargement monitoring is essential for surgical timing and for operative design. In this regard, several imaging techniques may have limitations: magnetic resonance is not widespread and is expensive, computed tomography uses radiation, and transesophageal echocardiography is a semi-invasive method. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of transthoracic echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic dimensions and its accuracy in comparison with multidetector computed tomography. In 44 patients with known ascending aortic aneurysms, transthoracic echocardiographic and computed tomographic measurements were obtained and compared at different levels: the annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, ascending aorta, and aortic arch. Transthoracic echocardiographic diameters were obtained in all patients, apart from the aortic arch, which was measured in 40 cases. Transthoracic echocardiographic and computed tomographic diameters correlated significantly (p <0.001), with very small SEEs: for the annulus, r = 0.846 (SEE 0.37); for the sinuses of Valsalva, r = 0.967 (SEE 0.35); for the sinotubular junction, r = 0.965 (SEE 0.33); for the ascending aorta, r = 0.976 (SEE 0.41); and for the aortic arch, r = 0.87 (SEE 0.50). In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiography is a feasible and accurate technique for the assessment and follow-up of thoracic aortic diameters in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms.