Sex Differences in Long-Term Survival after a First Stroke with Intravenous Thrombolysis: Ebrictus Study.

BACKGROUND: A number of large trials have confirmed the benefits of thrombolysis in acute stroke, but there are gender differences. We sought to examine the relationship between sex and outcome after thrombolysis. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study including 1,272 incident ischemic strokes (597 in women) from April 1, 2006 to December 31, 2014. Statistical approaches were used for analyzing survival outcomes and their relationship with thrombolysis therapy. RESULTS: The death rates were lower (p = 0.003) in the thrombolysis therapy group with an incidence ratio of 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.83). 113 (8.8%) patients (53 women) received thrombolysis. They were significantly younger (69.2 ± 12.7 vs. 73.9 ± 12.5 years; p < 0.001), had higher NIHSS score (12.7 ± 6.3 vs. 7.3 ± 7.0; p < 0.001), spent more days in hospital (10.4 ± 8.3 vs. 8.3 ± 7.9; p < 0.001), and had a higher average Barthel score at discharge (85.5 ± 24.4 vs. 79.2 ± 28.6; p = 0.023). The male/female incidence ratio showed a significant decrease (p = 0.01) in the incidence of mortality in women and a better Barthel score. The thrombolysis improved the survival in the overall group with thrombolysis versus without thrombolysis (p = 0.028), in women versus in men with thrombolysis (p = 0.023), and in women with thrombolysis versus in those without thrombolysis (p < 0.001) but not in men with thrombolysis versus in those without thrombolysis (p = 0.743). The protective factors as regards mortality were thrombolysis therapy (95% CI 0.37-0.80; p = 0.002), Barthel score ≥ 60 (95% CI 0.81-0.94; p = 0.002), and cardiovascular secondary prevention 1 year after stroke (0.13, 95% CI 0.06-0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The stroke death rates were lower in women after thrombolysis treatment and suggest significant benefit for women in this setting. The overall benefit on survival of the patients treated with thrombolysis might be explained by the beneficial effect of the thrombolysis on the women.

Results from the Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (AFABE): Gap between Undiagnosed and Registered Atrial Fibrillation in Adults--Ineffectiveness of Oral Anticoagulation Treatment with VKA.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) medication, recommended by national guidelines for stroke prevention but reportedly underused in AF patients with moderate to high stroke risk. METHOD: A multicentre and cross-sectional study of undiagnosed AF among out-of-hospital patients over 60 years old was carried out, visiting 3,638 patients at primary health centres or at home for AF diagnosis using the IDC-10 classification. The main outcome measures were CHA2DS2VASC, HAS-BLED scores, cardiovascular comorbidity, pharmacological information, TTR, and SAMe-TT2R2 scores. RESULTS: The main findings were undiagnosed AF in 26.44% of cases; 31.04% registered with AF but not using OAC despite 95.6% having a CHA2DS2VASC ≥ 2 score; a risk of bleeding in important subgroups using OAC without indication (37.50% CHA2DS2VASC < 2 score); the use of OAC with TTR < 60% (33.1%), of whom 47.6% had a HAS-BLED score ≥3. Thus, 35.4% of the expected AF prevalence achieved an optimal time in the therapeutic range. CONCLUSIONS: The expected AF prevalence was 10.9% (n 5267), but the registered prevalence was 7.5% (n 3638). Only 35.04% (CI = 95%, 33.7-36.3) of AF patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) achieve the goal of TTR > 60%.

El circuito asistencial de la fibrilación auricular en pacientes ambulatorios: estudio observacional Audit fibrilación auricular en el Baix Ebre / The management of atrial fibrillation and characteristics of its current care in outpatients. AFABE observational study

OBJETIVO: Conocer el circuito asistencial de la fibrilación auricular (FA): diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento en el contexto asistencial del sistema sanitario público. DISEÑO: AFABE es un estudio observacional, multicéntrico y descriptivo, con datos retrospectivos relacionados con el diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento de una cohorte de pacientes ambulatorios con FA en el contexto de la atención primaria, servicios de urgencias y cardiología referentes. Emplazamiento: Atención primaria y especializada. Comarca del Baix Ebre. Tarragona. España. Participantes: Muestra representativa de pacientes con FA > 60 años, seleccionados aleatoriamente entre los pacientes registrados en los 22 centros de atención primaria existentes en el territorio del estudio. Mediciones principales: Datos demográficos, comorbilidades, valor CHA2DS2-VASc y HAS_BLED, y patrones asistenciales resultantes entre la atención primaria y servicios referentes. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 182 pacientes, de 78,5; DE:7,3 años, y el 50% mujeres. En atención primaria (AP) se realizó el primer contacto en el 68,3% (IC 95% 60,3-76,3) de los casos de FA, de los que un 56,3% (IC 95% 45,2-66,0) fueron enviados al servicio de urgencias del hospital referente. El 72,7% (IC 95% 63,5-79,0) de los tratamientos anticoagulantes orales y el 58,44% (IC 95% 49,4-66,9) de los tratamientos antiarrítmicos se iniciaron en el servicio de urgencias referente. Un 55,9% (IC 95% 47,2-64,7) de los pacientes son seguidos por el servicio de cardiología referente. CONCLUSIONES: El médico de AP realiza el primer contacto de la mayoría de FA y deriva el 55% de los casos al servicio de urgencias hospitalario donde se inician la mayoría de tratamientos específicos de la FA

AIM: To provide insights into the characteristics and management of outpatients when their atrial fibrillation (AF) was first detected: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in the context of the public health system. DESIGN: AFABE is an observational, multicentre descriptive study with retrospective data collection relating to the practice patterns, management and initial strategies of treatment of patients with diagnosed AF in the context of primary care, emergency and cardiologists of the public health system. Setting: Primary and Specialist care. Baix Ebre region. Tarragona. Spain. Subjects: A representative sample of 182 subjects > 60-year-old with AF who have been randomized, recruited among the registered patients with AF in 22 primary care centres in the area of the study. Mesurements: Demographic data, comorbidities (AF), CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS BLED scores, and practice patterns results between Primary Care and referral services. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included (mean age 78.5 SD: 7.3 years; 50% women). Most patients (68.3% 95%CI; 60.3-76.3) had the first contact in Primary Care, of which 56.3% (95%CI;45.2-66.0) were sent to Hospital Emergency Department where 72.7% (95%CI: 63.5-79.0) of the oral anticoagulation and 58.4% (95%CI: 49.4-66.9) of antiarrhytmic treatments were started. More than half (55.9%:95%CI; 47.2-64.7, of patients with permanent AF were followed-up by the Cardiology department. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with newly diagnosed AF made a first contact with Primary Care, but around half were sent to Hospital Emergency departments, where they were treated with an antiarrhythmic and/or oral anticoagulation

[The management of atrial fibrillation and characteristics of its current care in outpatients. AFABE observational study]. / El circuito asistencial de la fibrilación auricular en pacientes ambulatorios: estudio observacional Audit fibrilación auricular en el Baix Ebre.

AIM: To provide insights into the characteristics and management of outpatients when their atrial fibrillation (AF) was first detected: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in the context of the public health system. DESIGN: AFABE is an observational, multicentre descriptive study with retrospective data collection relating to the practice patterns, management and initial strategies of treatment of patients with diagnosed AF in the context of primary care, emergency and cardiologists of the public health system. SETTING: Primary and Specialist care. Baix Ebre region. Tarragona. Spain. SUBJECTS: A representative sample of 182 subjects > 60-year-old with AF who have been randomized, recruited among the registered patients with AF in 22 primary care centres in the area of the study. MESUREMENTS: Demographic data, comorbidities (AF), CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS_BLED scores, and practice patterns results between Primary Care and referral services. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included (mean age 78.5 SD:7.3 years; 50% women). Most patients (68.3% 95%CI; 60.3-76.3) had the first contact in Primary Care, of which 56.3% (95%CI; 45.2-66.0) were sent to Hospital Emergency Department where 72.7% (95%CI: 63.5-79.0) of the oral anticoagulation and 58.4% (95%CI: 49.4-66.9) of antiarrhytmic treatments were started. More than half (55.9%:95%CI; 47.2-64.7, of patients with permanent AF were followed-up by the Cardiology department. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with newly diagnosed AF made a first contact with Primary Care, but around half were sent to Hospital Emergency departments, where they were treated with an antiarrhythmic and/or oral anticoagulation.