RESUMO
PURPOSE: The goal of this phase III, comparative, multicentric, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was to investigate the superiority of subconjunctival bevacizumab injections versus placebo in the treatment of corneal neovascularization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 38 eyes (38 patients) with corneal neovascularization. Twenty patients received bevacizumab and 18 placebos. Patients received 3 monthly injections of either 5mg (0.2mL) bevacizumab or placebo. The main criteria of success was reduction of the surface area of corneal neovascularization after 3months (M3) versus baseline, as measured using semi-automatic analysis of color photographs. RESULTS: The percentage of neovascularized corneal surface decreased by -8.6%±32.8 with bevacizumab, versus -2.6%±20.8 with placebo (p=0.5284). Four patients were determined to be responders (reduction of more than 30%), 3 in the bevacizumab group and 1 in the placebo group, all with neovascularization of less than 1year duration. When restricting the analysis to neovascularization of less than 1 year duration, the difference approached the threshold for significance (-31.8%±42.4 in the bevacizumab group and -0.9%±23.1 in the placebo group) (p=0.0637), as well as the number of responders (3/6 in the bevacizumab group versus 1/10 in the placebo group) (p=0.1181). No serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: This study shows the efficacy of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in the reduction of neovascularized corneal surface area versus placebo, but only when the neovascularization has been present less than 1year. Nevertheless, the study did not attain the statistical power to pass the threshold of significance.
