Predictive criteria of insignificant prostate cancer: what is the correspondence of linear extent to percentage of cancer in a single core?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of active surveillance of early prostate cancer is to individualize therapy by selecting for curative treatment only patients with significant cancer. Epstein's criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant cancer in surgical specimens are widely used. Epstein's criterion "no single core with >50% cancer has no correspondence in linear extent. The aim of this study is to find a possible correspondence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a total of 401 consecutive patients submitted to radical prostatectomy, 17 (4.2%) met criteria for insignificant cancer in the surgical specimen. The clinicopathologic findings in the correspondent biopsies were compared with Epstein's criteria for insignificant cancer. Cancer in a single core was evaluated in percentage as well as linear extent in mm. RESULTS: Comparing the clinicopathologic findings with Epstein's criteria predictive of insignificant cancer, there was 100% concordance for clinical stage T1c, no Gleason pattern 4 or 5, ≤ 2 cores with cancer, and no single core with >50% cancer. However, only 25% had density ≤ 0.15. The mean, median and range of the maximum length of cancer in a single core in mm were 1.19, 1, and 0.5-2.5, respectively. Additionally, the mean, median, and range of length of cancer in all cores in mm were 1.47, 1.5, and 0.5-3, respectively. CONCLUSION: To pathologists that use Epstein's criteria predictive of insignificant cancer and measure linear extent in mm, our study favors that "no single core with >50% cancer" may correspond to >2.5 mm in linear extent.

Predictive criteria of insignificant prostate cancer: what is the correspondence of linear extent to percentage of cancer in a single core?

Objective The aim of active surveillance of early prostate cancer is to individualize therapy by selecting for curative treatment only patients with significant cancer. Epstein’s criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant cancer in surgical specimens are widely used. Epstein’s criterion “no single core with >50% cancer” has no correspondence in linear extent. The aim of this study is to find a possible correspondence. Materials and Methods From a total of 401 consecutive patients submitted to radical prostatectomy, 17 (4.2%) met criteria for insignificant cancer in the surgical specimen. The clinicopathologic findings in the correspondent biopsies were compared with Epstein’s criteria for insignificant cancer. Cancer in a single core was evaluated in percentage as well as linear extent in mm. Results Comparing the clinicopathologic findings with Epstein’s criteria predictive of insignificant cancer, there was 100% concordance for clinical stage T1c, no Gleason pattern 4 or 5, ≤2 cores with cancer, and no single core with >50% cancer. However, only 25% had density ≤0.15. The mean, median and range of the maximum length of cancer in a single core in mm were 1.19, 1, and 0.5-2.5, respectively. Additionally, the mean, median, and range of length of cancer in all cores in mm were 1.47, 1.5, and 0.5-3, respectively. Conclusion To pathologists that use Epstein’s criteria predictive of insignificant cancer and measure linear extent in mm, our study favors that “no single core with >50% cancer” may correspond to >2.5 mm in linear extent. .

Controversial predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a study from a Latin American (Brazilian) Institution

Purpose To analyze controversial clinicopathologic predictors of biochemical recurrence after surgery: age, race, tumor extent on surgical specimen, tumor extent on needle biopsy, Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 4 + 3, and amount of extent of extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margins. Materials and Methods The needle biopsies and the correspondent surgical specimens were analyzed from 400 patients. Time to recurrence was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier curves and risk of shorter time to recurrence using Cox univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Except for age, race, maximum percentage of cancer per core, and number of cores with cancer, all other variables studied were significantly predictive of time to biochemical recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier curves. In univariate analysis, except for focal extraprostatic extension, age, race, focal positive surgical margins, and maximum extent and percentage of cancer per core, all other variables were significantly predictive of shorter time to recurrence. On multivariate analysis, diffuse positive surgical margins and preoperative PSA were independent predictors. Conclusions Young patients and non-whites were not significantly associated with time to biochemical recurrence. The time consuming tumor extent evaluation in surgical specimens seems not to add additional information to other well established predictive findings. The higher predictive value of Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 vs 3 + 4 = 7 discloses the importance of grade 4 as the predominant pattern. Extent and not simply presence or absent of extraprostatic extension should be informed. Most tumor extent evaluations on needle biopsies are predictive of time to biochemical recurrence, however, maximum percentage of cancer in all cores was the strongest predictor. .

Controversial predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a study from a Latin American (Brazilian) institution.

PURPOSE: To analyze controversial clinicopathologic predictors of biochemical recurrence after surgery: age, race, tumor extent on surgical specimen, tumor extent on needle biopsy, Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 4 + 3, and amount of extent of extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The needle biopsies and the correspondent surgical specimens were analyzed from 400 patients. Time to recurrence was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier curves and risk of shorter time to recurrence using Cox univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Except for age, race, maximum percentage of cancer per core, and number of cores with cancer, all other variables studied were significantly predictive of time to biochemical recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier curves. In univariate analysis, except for focal extraprostatic extension, age, race, focal positive surgical margins, and maximum extent and percentage of cancer per core, all other variables were significantly predictive of shorter time to recurrence. On multivariate analysis, diffuse positive surgical margins and preoperative PSA were independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients and non-whites were not significantly associated with time to biochemical recurrence. The time consuming tumor extent evaluation in surgical specimens seems not to add additional information to other well established predictive findings. The higher predictive value of Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 vs 3 + 4 = 7 discloses the importance of grade 4 as the predominant pattern. Extent and not simply presence or absent of extraprostatic extension should be informed. Most tumor extent evaluations on needle biopsies are predictive of time to biochemical recurrence, however, maximum percentage of cancer in all cores was the strongest predictor.

Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVES: To find whether any particular method of measuring cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies is superior to others in predicting pathological stage >T2 and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on 168 extended biopsies and the correspondent step-sectioned surgical specimens. Tumor extent was evaluated as: (1) number and percentage of cores with carcinoma; (2) total length and percentage of cancer in mm in all cores; and (3) the greatest length and percentage of cancer in a single core. RESULTS: All measurements significantly predicted stage >pT2 using logistic regression. With the exception of the greatest length and percentage of cancer in a single core, all other methods were also associated with a higher risk for biochemical recurrence (Cox method). Percentage of length of carcinoma in all cores was significantly and consistently stronger than other measures in all comparisons and combined to preoperative PSA and Gleason grade in multivariate analysis gained prediction for pathologic stage >T2 and was independent of risk of biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Percentage of total length of carcinoma in mm in all cores of a needle biopsy had the strongest predictive positive value for stage >pT2 and risk for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Combined with preoperative PSA and Gleason grade on biopsy may improve the predictive value for stage >pT2.