History of the National Cancer Registry of Panama.

Background: The National Cancer Registry of Panama (NCRP) was established in 1974. In 1984, histological confirmation became mandatory. The now pathology-based registry has evolved and has been a population-based cancer registry (PBCR) since 2012 with cancer-specific Web-based reporting software. Herein, we characterize the main features in its development that may help readers understand its evolution and improvements that are needed to be in line with international standards. Methods: We describe the major components of the NCRP using its structure, processes, and a results framework for 3 major periods since its inception: 1974-1999, 2000-2011, and 2012 to present. Results: The NCRP has always been linked to the Ministry of Health of Panama. Until the end of its second period, it operated as a pathology-based registry and all staff worked part time. Currently, the NCRP is based on passive reporting through a Web-based system set up for both public and private health institutions, covering 77% of the existing health-care institutions in the nation. The number of cases with unknown age were less than 10 per year and primary tumors with unknown origin were at most 3%. The proportion of death certificate only (DCO) cases decreased 5% in 18 years. Men are more likely to have DCO than women (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.48-1.58). Discussion: The NCRP has evolved, achieving significant improvements and progress over the years. Yet, much remains to be done. To provide internationally comparable, valid, and timely cancer incidence data, the NCRP should continue to improve its quality and coverage and provide continuous staff training on cancer registry procedures.

Diabetes mellitus, its prevalence, awareness, and control in Panama: Data from ENSPA 2019, a national cross-sectional study.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) represents an important global burden of disease. In Panama, DM was investigated in 1 study utilizing questionnaires and in another using biomarkers, but at subnational level. Using data from a recent cross-sectional country-wide population-based study that included biomarkers, we estimated the prevalence of DM, its awareness, and control; evaluating possible risk factors. We used data from 4400 participants aged 18 years or older from the National Health Study of Panama (ENSPA) study conducted in 2019 at a national level. Weighted prevalence and 95% confidence intervals for DM, awareness, and control were estimated by sociodemographic factors, family history of DM, tobacco and alcohol use, nutritional status, and hypertension. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using logistic regression models to assess the possible risk factors associated with DM prevalence and awareness. We generated OR estimates by pooling ENSPA data with a previous regional study, prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. The prevalence of DM was estimated to be 12.4% (10.9%-14.05%). In both men and women, age, family history of diabetes (OR in men: 4.0 ([2.4-6.7]; OR in women 3.5 [2.5-4.8]), and obesity (OR in men: 2.6 [1.4-5.1]; OR in women: 2.0 [0.9-4.5]) were associated with DM. Diagnosed and controlled hypertension was associated with DM only in women (OR: 2.1 [1.2-3.6]). DM awareness was estimated to be 62.6% (56.3%-68.9%). In both men and women, DM awareness was associated with age and a family history of diabetes (OR in men: 6.6 [2.4-18.4]; OR in women 1.9 ([1.1-3.6]). In women, having secondary education (OR: 1.9 [0.9-3.9]) and being diagnosed with uncontrolled hypertension (OR: 3.3 [1.2-9.5]) was also associated to DM awareness. Men in the ENSPA study were less likely to be aware of DM than those in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (OR: 0.2 [0.0-0.7]). Less than half of the individuals diagnosed with DM had their condition controlled (39.6% [31.4%-47.8%]). This study revealed that the prevalence, awareness, and control of DM were similar to recent estimates reported in other Latin American countries. It also provides a baseline regarding DM and associated risk factors in Panama at a country-level knowledge that is essential for health policy development and useful in clinical practice.

Description of the National Mortality Register of Panama.

Introduction: The National Mortality Register (NMR) of Panama is a key element in demographic analysis and in acquiring an updated picture of population health in Panama. The main objectives of this study are to characterize the NMR and to enumerate its strengths and weaknesses. Methods: We describe the history, processes, and structure of the Vital Statistics Section of the National Institute of Statistics and Census (the curator of the NMR database). In addition, we discuss publication punctuality, underregistration of the data, the proportion of registered deaths certified by medical doctors, and the top 5 causes of death according to the 80 groups of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision. We also examine works derived from the register's data, from the first publication on its website (2002) until 2019. Results: The NMR procedures were described. The web reports of the NMR were performed with a delay of between 1 to 2 years. The underregistration of deaths in 2002-2019 was 14.7%, and the national yearly proportion of deaths certified by medical doctors was always above 90%. Hard-to-reach areas had higher underregistration proportions and fewer deaths certified by medical doctors. Information extracted from the NMR supports several national and international reports, geographic information systems, and studies. The most common causes of death between 2002 and 2019 were noncommunicable diseases. Conclusions: The NMR is a robust official information system. However, hard-to-reach areas require improvement in terms of the NMR. The NMR is used for publishing official reports, writing studies, and updating reports on the current health status of Panama in a timely fashion following international guidelines.

Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Individuals in Panama 2019: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

Poor medication adherence is a public health concern leading to a large burden of cardiovascular disease among persons with hypertension. Using data from 3281 persons with diagnosed hypertension (N = 622,581) from the Panamanian National Health Survey (ENSPA) collected in 2019, we assessed the national prevalence of low-moderate medication adherence in hypertensive individuals using the 4-scale Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (4-MMAS) and identifying gender-specific associated factors. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between possible risk factors and low-moderate medication adherence with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) stratified by gender. The national prevalence of low-moderate medication adherence was 78.2% (95% CI: 74.7-81.0%); in men it was 74.4% (95% CI: 67.5-80.3%) and in women it was 81.4% (78.4-84.0%). In women, low-moderate medication adherence was associated with living in indigenous area (OR: 5.15; 95% CI: 1.40-18.98), educational level (OR no formal education: 0.77, 95% CI 0.28-2.14; OR for primary education: 0.76, 95% CI 0.38-1.56; OR for secondary education: 0.90, 95% CI 0.48-1.70; Higher education as reference), increased BMI (normal as reference, OR for overweight: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.73-2.50, OR for obesity: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.90-3.03) and medical diagnosis of anxiety/depression (OR: 4.89, 95% CI: 1.36-17.49). However, in men, it was associated with having secondary education (OR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.03-8.36), currently smoking (OR: 16.74, 95% CI: 1.83-152.70), taking antihypertensive medication with denial of hypertension diagnosis (OR: 4.35, 95% CI: 1.11-17.11) and having less than three annual check-ups (OR for no health check-ups: 2.97, 95% CI: 0.63-13.88; OR for 1-2 check-ups: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.78-3.32: three or more health check-ups: reference). Time since diagnosis was inversely associated with low-moderate adherence. This study assesses for the first time the national prevalence of low-moderate medication adherence among hypertensive individuals in Panama. Low-moderate medication adherence is an important public health issue that should be addressed to achieve blood pressure control in patients diagnosed with hypertension, taking into account gender-specific factors.

Tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship ban enforcement index at sales points in Panama, 2017.

INTRODUCTION: We assess the tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) ban enforcement in sales points in Panama in 2017. METHODS: A nationwide observational survey to assess TAPS ban enforcement in sales points was conducted and involved retail sale in non-specialized stores with food, beverages or tobacco predominating according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities Rev. 4. A TAPS ban enforcement index was developed from factorial analysis by principal component with a polychoric correlation matrix to calculate the mean national index value. RESULTS: The national TAPS ban enforcement index value was found to be 3.03. The index value in sales points according to the tobacco products advertisement was 1.98, which was significantly lower where the advertisement was present and 3.09 where it was absent (t=7.57, p<0.05). Each of the three health regions corresponding to Indigenous Territories had an index below the national mean: Emberá-Wounáan (2.52), Guna-Yala (2.65), and Ngäbe-Buglé (2.91). Similar findings were observed among health regions with a west national border: Chiriquí (2.80) and Bocas Del Toro (2.93). On the other hand, the top indices were observed in Panama Metro (3.25), Darién (3.53) and Coclé (3.63). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high level of enforcement of the TAPS ban as a consequence of the full implementation of the FCTC as a law in Panama. However, indigenous territories and west national border areas had the lowest TAPS ban enforcement, making these populations vulnerable. A fertile ground for future research includes the identification of possible vulnerable targets for tobacco products advertisement, particularly in urban areas.

Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of tobacco-associated diseases and how it is influenced by tobacco products advertisement, promotion and sponsorship while enforcing a strong and comprehensive ban in Panama: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions (KAP) of tobacco-associated diseases, and how it is influenced by tobacco products' advertisement, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) while enforcing a strong and comprehensive ban. DESIGN: The Panamanian implementation of the Global Adult Tobacco Survey: an international standardised cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: National Panamanian population aged between 15 years and 29 years old. PARTICIPANTS: There were 4796 responding participants (n=905 830 in the expanded sample). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: An index was developed using factorial analysis using TAPS and KAP variables. The primary outcomes were: (1) The national median index value. (2) The index value stratified by sex, age, occupation, income quintile and geographical areas. (3) The first and second factor loadings (FFL and SFL, respectively) for variables included in the KAP index. RESULTS: Fifteen out of the 16 variables comprising the index were variables related to KAP and one variable was related to TAPS. The top three variables according to their FFL were 'KAP that cigarette is associated to …': (1) '… bladder cancer'. (2) '… breast cancer'. (3) '… stomach cancer'. The top three variables according to the SFL were 'KAP that cigarette is associated to …': (1)'… chronic bronchitis'. (2) '… myocardial infarction'. (3) '… lung cancer'. Illegal tobacco advertisement in posters was the only TAPS variable included in the index. The national KAP index value was 0.26. Our results show that current smokers, teens, men, people with the lowest income quintile, and those living in Guna Yala Indigenous Territory (health region with the highest smoking prevalence) had a lower median value than the national median. CONCLUSIONS: Men, young adults and deprived youth had the lowest median KAP index. Illegal TAPS had no influence on the KAP of tobacco-associated diseases when a strong and comprehensive ban is enforced.

Comorbidities in relation to fatality of first myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Present knowledge concerning potential associations between comorbidities and the fatality of a first myocardial infarction (MI) is limited. AIM: To identify comorbidities in 45-70-year-old individuals who suffered a first MI and died within 7 days in Stockholm County from 1992-1994. In addition, to assess how each of the comorbidities identified, as well as the number of hospitalizations during the 10-year period prior to the MI, was associated with MI fatality. METHODS: The data collected on our inception cohort of 1984 first MI, of which 524 were fatal within 7 days, were primarily self-reported, proxy-reported by questionnaire and/or extracted from comprehensive national registers. Comorbidities among fatal cases with a prevalence >2% were identified. Risk ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for the association of MI fatality with number of prior hospitalizations and specific comorbidities were calculated using binomial regression with log link. A structured review of autopsy reports on fatal cases was performed in order to identify additional indicators of comorbidities. RESULTS: After adjusting for sex, age and disposable income, the number of previous hospitalizations was associated with 7-day MI fatality. Of the comorbidities identified as prevalent in fatal cases, the following were associated with 7-day fatality in crude analysis: epilepsy, heart failure, stroke, alcoholism, cancer, renal diseases, asthma, psychiatric diseases, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. Indicators of comorbidities identified from autopsy data included a silent MI, severe atherosclerosis of the abdominal aorta, and hepatic steatosis. Adjustments for sex and age (although not possible for epilepsy and alcoholism), did not substantially alter results. CONCLUSIONS: Our current findings indicate that in connection with a first MI, particular attention should be paid to those with repeated prior hospitalizations and/or epilepsy, heart failure, stroke, alcoholism, cancer, renal diseases, asthma, psychiatric diseases, diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis.

Agreement between Myocardial Infarction Patients and Their Spouses on Reporting of Data on 82 Cardiovascular Risk Exposures.

BACKGROUND: The validity of exposure data collected from proxy respondents of myocardial infarction patients has scarcely been studied. We assessed the level of disagreement between myocardial infarction patients and their spouses with respect to the reporting of the patient´s cardiovascular risk exposures. METHODS: Within the frame of the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP), a case-control study of risk factors of myocardial infarction performed in Stockholm county 1992-1994, a subset of 327 first time myocardial infarction cases aged 45-70 who survived >28 days after the event and who co-habited with a spouse or common-law spouse (proxy) were identified between 1993-04-05 and 1993-12-31. Among these, 243 cases participated along with their respective proxy in the present study. Control individuals, matched to cases by age, sex and residential area were also included (n = 243). Data were collected using questionnaires. Using conditional logistic regression we calculated for each of 82 exposures the odds ratio based on information collected from 1) myocardial infarction cases and controls [odds ratio A] and 2) proxies and the same set of controls [odds ratio B]. Disagreement was measured by calculating the ratio between odds ratio B and odds ratio A with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using resampling bootstrap. RESULTS: For the vast majority of the exposures considered including diet, smoking, education, work-related stress, and family history of CVD, there was no statistically significant disagreement between myocardial infarction patients and proxies (n = 243 pairs). However, leisure time physical inactivity (proxy bias = 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-3.57) was overestimated by spouses compared to myocardial infarction patients. A few other exposures including some sleep-related problems and work-related issues also showed disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarction patients and their spouses similarly reported data on a wide range of exposures including the majority of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, leisure time physical inactivity being an exception.