Antibacterials for the prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial endocarditis in children.

Although the overall incidence of infective endocarditis in the paediatric population is considered to be low, over the last 20 years a rising trend in infective endocarditis has been observed among children. This could be due to several reasons including the availability of improved diagnostic techniques, use of continuous central venous catheters and cardiac implants increasing the risk of infection, and the survival of a greater number of infants with congenital heart disease as a result of improved medical management. The predominant causative organisms of paediatric endocarditis include staphylococci and streptococci. There is increased concern surrounding the emergence of endocarditis in children caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and drug resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. The treatment approach to paediatric endocarditis is similar to that for adult patients with endocarditis because of similarities in disease pathogenesis and aetiology. The therapeutic goal is to achieve sterilisation of the cardiac vegetations. The choice of antibacterial is dependent upon the susceptibility profile of the causative organism. Vancomycin or gentamicin is recommended for enterococcal endocarditis, according to guidelines from the American Heart Association. For staphylococcal endocarditis in patients with no prosthetic valve, oxacillin or nafcillin with or without gentamicin is the treatment of choice. In the case of endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin is commonly used in patients with no prosthetic valve and a combination of vancomycin, gentamicin and rifampicin (rifampin) for patients with prosthetic material. Cefazolin or ceftriaxone is the treatment of choice for penicillin allergic paediatric patients with endocarditis caused by viridans streptococci. While there have been no major changes in endocarditis therapy for the last decade, the current focus is on the recognition of multiple-drug resistant pathogens and the use of newer agents such as quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of resistant bacterial endocarditis. Prophylactic antibacterial therapy is recommended for procedures thought to be associated with the occurrence of bacteraemia involving organisms commonly associated with endocarditis. These include dental extractions and oral, respiratory tract, genitourinary, gastrointestinal or oesophageal procedures. Prophylactic antibacterials recommended by the American Heart Association during genitourinary and gastrointestinal surgical procedures in high risk patients include ampicillin + gentamicin or vancomycin + gentamicin in high risk patients with penicillin allergy. Ampicillin has been recommended for prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis in children undergoing oral, respiratory tract or oesophageal procedures. In the case of penicillin allergy in these patients, cephalosporins, clindamycin, azithromycin or clarithromycin have been recommended. The general consensus is that antibacterial prophylaxis during dental procedure is unnecessary, and in fact propagates bacterial resistance.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of high dose extended interval piperacillin-tazobactam.

A multiple-dose, open-labelled, randomized, two period crossover human volunteer study was performed (i) to describe the pharmacokinetic profile and safety profile of piperacillin and tazobactam (P/T) administered 6.0/0.75 g and 8.0/1.0 g q12h and (ii) to characterize the pharmacodynamic profile of these regimens against a variety of common targeted pathogens. Blood samples were collected after the third dose and concentrations of P/T were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Pharmacokinetic profiles of P/T were determined by non-compartment analysis. Percentage time above the MIC (%T > MIC) of piperacillin was calculated for a range of MICs. In this study, no adverse events were attributed after multiple administrations of either 6.0/0.75 g or 8.0/1.0 g dose regimens. The peak concentration, half-life and area under the curve (AUC0-(0-tau)) of piperacillin were significantly different by a paired t-test (P < 0.05) between the two study regimens. The trough concentration, half-life and area under the curve (AUC0-(0-tau)) of tazobactam were substantially different from parameters reported previously for conventional regimens. The 8.0/1.0 g regimen provided 50% T > MIC for MICs < or =32 mg/L, while a similar value for the 6.0/0.75 g regimen was < or = 16 mg/L. High-dose P/T regimens with extended interval were well tolerated and provide adequate dynamic exposure for a variety of susceptible pathogens.

Pharmacodynamics of ceftriaxone and cefixime against community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens.

Over the last decade or so there has been a growing interest in routes of antimicrobial administration other than by the conventional intravenous route for institutionalized patients and for some outpatients. Both oral (PO) and intramuscular (IM) routes of administration are less costly than giving antimicrobial agents by vein (IV). In addition, fewer complications such as catheter-related sepsis and phlebitis are associated with non-IV routes of administration. Furthermore, a reduced-dosage, reduced-volume IM administration of ceftriaxone may provide a tolerable route of administration and equivalent bactericidal activities compared with higher dose IV ceftriaxone. The purpose of this study was to determine the time that the drug concentration remained in excess of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (T > MIC) and the duration of bactericidal activities of ceftriaxone one gram administered IV, ceftriaxone 250 mg given IM and cefixime 400 mg given orally against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in adult volunteers. Single doses of each agent were administered and serum concentrations were collected over the standard dosing period of 24 h for all study regimens. Ceftriaxone, regardless of route of administration and dose, resulted in bactericidal activities and T > MIC for 100% of the dosing period for S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis. Cefixime maintained at least 50% T > MIC and bactericidal activity against both isolates each of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. Against both isolates of S. pneumoniae, cefixime achieved T > MIC for at least 50% of the dosing period, but did not maintain bactericidal activity. Reduced dose ceftriaxone given IM seems to be a viable alternative to ceftriaxone IV if the pathogen, susceptibility and infection site are known. Based on T > MIC exceeding 50% of the dosing interval, cefixime would be considered an effective alternative to IV therapy against common respiratory tract pathogens. Clinical studies need to be conducted to confirm these findings.

Continuous versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in intensive care unit patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

A prospective, randomized pilot study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of continuous versus intermittent ceftazidime in ICU patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Ceftazidime was administered either as a 3 g/day continuous infusion (CI) or an intermittent infusion (II) of 2 g every 8 h. In addition, all patients received concomitant once-daily tobramycin. The demographics of the evaluable patients (n = 35) were similar between the groups: age (years), CI 46 +/- 16, II 56 +/- 20; Apache score, CI 14 +/- 4, II 16 +/- 6; time (days) from admission to diagnosis, CI 9 +/- 6, II 9 +/- 6. Clinical efficacy, defined as cure/improvement was similar between groups [n (%), CI 16/17 (94), II 15/18 (83)], while microbiological response was also comparable [n (%), CI 10/13 (76), II 12/15 (80)]. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for all isolates were measured throughout the treatment course; there was no development of resistance during therapy for either regimen. While limited clinical data exist, our results suggest that the use of ceftazidime by CI administration maintains clinical efficacy, optimizes the pharmacodynamic profile and uses less antibiotic compared with the standard 2 g every 8 h intermittent dosing regimen.

Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime by continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion for nosocomial pneumonia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if continuous-infusion ceftazidime is more cost-effective and efficacious than intermittent infusion in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, randomized trial. SETTING: Large, community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with nosocomial pneumonia. INTERVENTIONS: Ceftazidime 3 g/day was administered as a continuous infusion or as 2 g 3 times/day by intermittent infusion to treat nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU. Patients also received tobramycin 7 mg/kg once/day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were evaluable; 17 received continuous infusion and 18 intermittent infusion. Clinical efficacy (94% and 83% successful outcomes with continuous and intermittent infusion, respectively), adverse events, and length of stay did not vary significantly between groups. Costs associated with continuous infusion, $627 +/- 388, were significantly lower (p < or = 0.001) than with intermittent infusion, $1007 +/- 430. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion of ceftazidime is a cost-effective alternative to intermittent infusion for nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU.

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose meropenem in adult cystic fibrosis patients.

Because patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have pulmonary exacerbations secondary to multi-antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, antibiotics, like meropenem, are often utilized. We studied the pharmacokinetics of meropenem (2 g i.v. administered every 8 h in clinically stable CF patients to determine if the recommended maximum doses could sustain adequate concentrations during the dosing interval. These pharmacokinetic data were similar to those obtained in non-CF populations. Using this regimen, concentrations of meropenem exceed the susceptibility breakpoint (4 microg/ml) for 50% of the dosing interval, and therefore provide optimization of the pharmacodynamic profile of the compound.

Circulating tumor necrosis factor-alpha production during the progression of rat endotoxic sepsis.

The endotoxin-mediated tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) induction was investigated in a rat endotoxin septic shock model. Rats were challenged intravenously with lethal doses of endotoxin. Circulating endotoxin and TNF-alpha concentrations were measured over various times following endotoxin administration. A derivative of human immunoglobulin G, 5S-IgG, was administered at various times relative to endotoxin dosing to test its anti-endotoxin activity. Results showed that endotoxin challenge initiated substantial amounts of TNF-alpha release into the rat circulatory system leading to death. A temporal pattern of TNF-alpha increases following endotoxin administration was observed; the rat plasma TNF-alpha level rapidly increased 60 min after endotoxin injection, peaked around 120 min and returned to low levels by 240 min. A rapid clearance pattern of endotoxin was also observed in rats. 5S-IgG exhibited its moderate anti-endotoxin activity by partially suppressing the endotoxin-mediated TNF-alpha release and decreasing the overall mortality only when given before triggering of TNF-alpha induction. However, this inhibitory effect of 5S-IgG on endotoxin-mediated TNF-alpha release and the resultant protective effect against endotoxin lethality rapidly diminished when 5S-IgG was administered after the occurrence of TNF-alpha induction. Collectively, these results suggest that the timing of the anti-endotoxin treatment is critical in achieving its effectiveness and imply that the endotoxin levels after the onset of the cytokine cascade is of questionable significance.

Lack of interaction between levofloxacin and oxycodone: pharmacokinetics and drug disposition.

Previous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in the oral bioavailability of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin when administered concomitantly with an intravenous opiate such as morphine. This decrease in absorption results in a 36% and 50% lower AUC for trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively, which could cause clinical failures. The authors investigated the possibility of a similar interaction between oxycodone and levofloxacin. Eight healthy volunteers were randomized in an open-label, two-way crossover study to receive oxycodone, 5 mg p.o. Q4H, and levofloxacin, 500 mg p.o. 1 hour after starting the oxycodone or levofloxacin 500 mg p.o. alone. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours for Cmax, tmax, and AUC determinations. There was not a significant difference (p > 0.05) in AUC (48.59 +/- 8.52 vs. 49.9 +/- 9.93), Cmax (7.73 +/- 2.6 vs. 6.6 +/- 2.0), and tmax (1.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.1) for levofloxacin versus levofloxacin/oxycodone regimens. It was concluded that oral oxycodone and levofloxacin can be administered concomitantly without a significant decrease in AUC, Cmax, or tmax.

Streptococcus pneumoniae response to repeated moxifloxacin or levofloxacin exposure in a rabbit tissue cage model.

The role of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics (PK) in antimicrobial efficacy and in the selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains was investigated using the rabbit tissue cage abscess model. A rabbit tissue cage was created by insertion of sterile Wiffle balls in the dorsal cervical area. Animals orally received a range of moxifloxacin or levofloxacin doses that simulate human PK for 7 days 48 h after the Wiffle balls were inoculated with fluoroquinolone-sensitive S. pneumoniae (10(7) CFU). Abscess fluid was collected on a daily basis over 14 days to measure bacterial density and MICs. Moxifloxacin regimens produced a range of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratios ranging from 9.2 to 444 and peak/MIC ratios ranging from 1.3 to 102. Levofloxacin doses produced AUC/MIC ratios of 5.1 to 85.5 and peak/MIC ratio of 0.9 to 14.8. Moxifloxacin at 6.5, 26, and 42 mg/kg reduced the bacterial log CFU per milliliter in abscess fluid (percentage of that in a sterile animal) by 4.2 +/- 2.2 (20%), 5.8 +/- 0.4 (100%), and 5.4 +/- 0.4 (100%), respectively, over the dosing period. Levofloxacin at 5.5, 22, and 32 mg/kg reduced the log CFU per milliliter in abscess fluid (percentage of that in a sterile animal) by 2.8 +/- 0.7 (20%), 5.1 +/- 1.3 (80%), and 4.6 +/- 1.3 (60%), respectively. Moxifloxacin has a greater bactericidal rate as determined by regression of log CFU versus time data. The AUC/MIC and peak/MIC ratios correlated with the efficacy of both drugs (P < 0.05). Resistance to either drug did not develop with any of the doses as assessed by a change in the MIC. In conclusion, data derived from this study show that moxifloxacin and levofloxacin exhibit rapid bactericidal activity against S. pneumoniae in vivo, and moxifloxacin exhibits enhanced bactericidal activity compared to levofloxacin, with AUC/MIC and peak/MIC ratios correlated with antimicrobial efficacy for both drugs. The development of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae was not observed with either drug in this model.

Clinical management of respiratory tract infections in the community: experience with telithromycin.

Among adults, acute sinusitis, tonsillitis/pharyngitis, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are the most commonly encountered respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in the community. Empiric antibacterial therapy is the most widely used approach for the treatment of such infections. The appropriate antibacterial requires consideration of a number of patient-, pathogen- and drug-related factors. One additional factor is the global spread of resistance among common respiratory pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, which limits the utility of existing antibacterials. Telithromycin (HMR 3647), the first of a new family of antibacterials, the ketolides, was designed specifically to provide optimal therapy for community-acquired RTIs. This agent, which has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against common respiratory pathogens (including resistant strains and atypical/intracellular organisms), has been clinically and bacteriologically evaluated against gold-standard comparators in a series of phase III clinical trials. The results of these studies demonstrate that telithromycin, at a dosage of 800 mg once daily, is an effective, well-tolerated agent for the treatment of the most commonly encountered community-acquired RTIs. Moreover, telithromycin meets the challenge of increasing antibacterial resistance. High rates of clinical cure and bacteriologic eradication were achieved, even in patients infected with problematic resistant pathogens such as penicillinG- and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. In summary, telithromycin represents a promising new antibacterial for the treatment of community-acquired RTIs. With high efficacy and bacterial eradication rates, good tolerability and convenient once-daily administration, telithromycin therapy should result in increased patient compliance and improved outcomes, thereby minimizing the risk of developing antibacterial resistance.

Comparison of the bactericidal activity of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin, alone and in combination with cefepime, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: Although ciprofloxacin exhibits more intense microbiological activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa than does trovafloxacin, the clinical relevance of this observation remains questionable, particularly when the agents are combined with another antipseudomonal agent. METHODS: To evaluate this further, we conducted a four-way crossover trial to compare the bactericidal activities of ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin, alone and in combination with cefepime, against three clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. Healthy subjects received the following regimens, dosed to steady state: trovafloxacin 300 mg/24 h; ciprofloxacin 400 mg/12 h; trovafloxacin 300 mg/24 h plus cefepime 2 g/12 h, and ciprofloxacin 400 mg/12 h plus cefepime 2 g/12 h. Serum bactericidal titers were performed with each regimen. RESULTS: As monotherapy, the area under the bactericidal curve for ciprofloxacin exceeded that of trovafloxacin for all isolates. No significant difference in the overall degree of bactericidal activity was noted for two of three P. aeruginosa isolates for the combination regimens. Additionally, both combination regimens provided bactericidal activity for 100% of the dosing interval for all isolates. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that, while in vitro differences exist among these quinolones for P. aeruginosa, when a fluoroquinolone is combined with a beta-lactam, this is likely to be of little clinical significance.

Comparison of vancomycin pharmacodynamics (1 g every 12 or 24 h) against methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

This study compared the duration of serum bactericidal activity for vancomycin, 1 g every 12 or 24 h at steady state, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CNS). All four test isolates were susceptible to vancomycin with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of either 2 or 4 mg/l. Serum bactericidal titres (SBTs) were run in duplicate and serum bactericidal activity (SBA) was defined as the time points at which all subject SBTs were greater than or equal to 1:2. For the every 12-h regimen, SBA was 10-12 h. With the every 24-h regimen, the duration of SBA was 10-16 h for MRSA and 8-10 h for MR-CNS. The pharmacodynamic data suggest that for those with good renal function a Q12h dosing interval is most appropriate for MR-CNS or staphylococcal isolates with MICs of 4.