The characterization and the impact of CSF pleocytosis during blinatumomab therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Reactive pleocytosis in the CSF has been observed with blinatumomab but has not been well-described. We performed a retrospective study of 88 patients who received intrathecal chemotherapy (IT) while on blinatumomab with CSF analyzed to determine if pleocytosis had an impact efficacy and safety. Blinatumomab was used for relapsed/refractory 62.5%, MRD-positive 31.8%, and consolidation in MRD-negative 5.7%. The incidence of pleocytosis in CSF was 51% and was more frequent after day 15 (55.8% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.025). Pleocytosis did not impact CR, clearance of MRD positivity, PFS and OS rates. Lower incidence of non-CNS extramedullary relapse was seen (3.7% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.011) with pleocytosis in CSF. Analysis of CSF by flow cytometry showed median CD4:CD8 ratio of 1.34. In conclusion, CSF pleocytosis is prevalent with blinatumomab but only demonstrated lower rates of non-CNS extramedullary relapse but no impact on CNS relapse or neurotoxicity.

Bone Marrow Collection: Comparison of Unassisted vs Assisted Bedside Collections by a Laboratory Technologist.

OBJECTIVES: Bone marrow collections are often difficult, and creating quality smears and touch preparations at the bedside can prove challenging. The objective of this study is to compare the quality of bone marrow specimens between unassisted and assisted bone marrow collections by a bone marrow technologist. METHODS: Data for this study were collected from 422 hematopathology reports over 14 months. We recorded the bone marrow quality of the different parts (aspirate smears, touch imprints, core biopsy, and clot/particle sections) as adequate, suboptimal, or inadequate. Student t test statistical analysis was performed between the corresponding parts in the two groups. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that the quality of assisted bone marrow specimens is significantly better compared with unassisted specimens, particularly for the aspirate smears (P < .0001) and touch imprints (P < .0001). Notably, the quality of aspirate smears was improved, which is important for cytologic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that assistance by a bone marrow technologist resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of bone marrow collection.