Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 344(19): 1427-33, 2001 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11346807

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In late 1996, vancomycin-resistant enterococci were first detected in the Siouxland region of Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota. A task force was created, and in 1997 the assistance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was sought in assessing the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the region's facilities and implementing recommendations for screening, infection control, and education at all 32 health care facilities in the region. METHODS: The infection-control intervention was evaluated in October 1998 and October 1999. We performed point-prevalence surveys, conducted a case-control study of gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and compared infection-control practices and screening policies for vancomycin-resistant enterococci at the acute care and long-term care facilities in the Siouxland region. RESULTS: Perianal-swab samples were obtained from 1954 of 2196 eligible patients (89 percent) in 1998 and 1820 of 2049 eligible patients (89 percent) in 1999. The overall prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci at 30 facilities that participated in all three years of the study decreased from 2.2 percent in 1997 to 1.4 percent in 1998 and to 0.5 percent in 1999 (P<0.001 by chi-square test for trend). The number of facilities that had had at least one patient with vancomycin-resistant enterococci declined from 15 in 1997 to 10 in 1998 to only 5 in 1999. At both acute care and long-term care facilities, the risk factors for colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci were prior hospitalization and treatment with antimicrobial agents. Most of the long-term care facilities screened for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (26 of 28 in 1998 [93 percent] and 23 of 25 in 1999 [92 percent]) and had infection-control policies to prevent the transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (22 of 25 [88 percent] in 1999). All four acute care facilities had screening and infection-control policies for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in 1998 and 1999. CONCLUSIONS: An active infection-control intervention, which includes the obtaining of surveillance cultures and the isolation of infected patients, can reduce or eliminate the transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the health care facilities of a region.


Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Enterococcus faecium/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Instalações de Saúde , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Resistência a Vancomicina , Adulto , Canal Anal/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Sistema Digestório/microbiologia , Enterococcus faecium/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/transmissão , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 29(1): 53-7, 2001 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11172319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In April 1997, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) emerged in several health care facilities in the Siouxland region and a VRE Task Force was formed. From 1997 through 1999, an evaluation of VRE prevalence at 30 facilities was performed. METHODS: In 1999, we conducted a survey and focus groups of health care workers to address initial reactions to VRE, feasibility of the Task Force recommendations, and lessons learned. RESULTS: Personnel at 29 (97%) facilities surveyed completed the questionnaire, and 15 health care workers from 11 facilities participated in 5 focus groups. The outcomes of expanded education and improved awareness of VRE for patients and health care workers were ranked the No. 1 priority overall and by long-term care facility personnel. Respondents agreed that Task Force recommendation adherence had significantly improved infection control (83%) and that the Task Force was an appropriate mechanism to coordinate infection control efforts (90%). Focus groups commented that it was most difficult to educate family members about VRE; they expressed concern about variation between VRE policies, especially between acute care and long-term care facilities, and about the quality of life of isolated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data illustrate that this intervention has been far-reaching and include the development of a health care infrastructure that may be used as a model to address additional health care issues (eg, emerging pathogens or biological threats).


Assuntos
Enterococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais Comunitários/normas , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Resistência a Vancomicina , Enterococcus/patogenicidade , Grupos Focais , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Iowa , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Isolamento de Pacientes , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
J Infect Dis ; 180(2): 391-6, 1999 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10395854

RESUMO

During early 1997, the Siouxland District Health Department (SDHD; Sioux City, IA) reported an increased incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) isolates at area health care facilities. To determine the prevalence and risk factors for colonization with VRE strains at 32 health care facilities in the SDHD region, a prevalence survey and case-control study were performed. Of 2266 patients and residents, 1934 (85%) participated, and 40 (2.1%) were positive for (gastrointestinal) VRE colonization. The prevalence of VRE isolates was significantly higher in acute care facilities (ACFs) than in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) (10/152 [6.6%] vs. 30/1782 [1.7%]; odds ratio [OR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-9.0). LTCF case patients were significantly more likely than controls to have been inpatients at any ACF (19/30 vs. 12/66; OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 2.7-23.8). Of 40 VRE isolates, 34 (85%) were a related strain. The predominant strain was present in all 12 LTCFs that had at least 1 case patient in each facility. Soon after the introduction of VRE isolates into this region, dissemination to multiple LTCFs resulted from resident transfer from ACFs to LTCFs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Enterococcus faecium/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/transmissão , Transferência de Pacientes , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecção Hospitalar , Sistema Digestório/microbiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Enterococcus faecium/classificação , Enterococcus faecium/genética , Enterococcus faecium/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA