Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabet Med ; 33(8): 1140-8, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26642179

RESUMO

AIMS: To examine the characteristics of patients with diabetes who regularly receive help from a supporter in preparing for and attending medical visits, and the association between this help and clinical risk factors for diabetes complications. METHODS: We linked survey data about family involvement for patients in the Veterans Health Administration system with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes (n = 588; mean 67 years; 97% male) with health record data on blood pressure, glycaemic control and prescription-fill gaps. We used multivariable regression to assess whether supporter presence and, among patients with supporters, supporter role (visit preparation, accompaniment to medical visit or no involvement) were associated with concurrent trends in clinical risk factors over 2 years, adjusting for sociodemographic and health characteristics. RESULTS: Most patients (78%) had a main health supporter; of these, more had regular support for preparing for appointments (69%) than were regularly accompanied to them (45%). Patients with preparation help only were younger and more educated than accompanied patients. Support presence and type was not significantly associated with clinical risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Family help preparing for appointments was common among these patients with high-risk diabetes. In its current form, family support for medical visits may not affect clinical factors in the short term. Supporters helping patients engage in medical visits may need training and assistance to have an impact on the clinical trajectory of patients with diabetes.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Cuidadores , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Complicações do Diabetes/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
3.
J Thromb Haemost ; 12(6): 847-54, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24612469

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite growing use, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are associated with risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We designed a study to determine patient, provider and device factors associated with this outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent PICC placement between 1 June 2009 to 30 June 2012. Symptomatic PICC-associated DVT was confirmed by ultrasound. Because PICCs are also recognized risk factors for lower-extremity DVT, lower-extremity DVT occurring while the PICC was in situ was included. Multivariable logistic and Cox-proportional hazards regression models were fit to examine the association between covariates specified a priori and PICC-DVT. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated. RESULTS: Of 966 unique PICC placements, 33 patients developed symptomatic PICC-associated DVT and 9 developed lower-extremity DVT, accounting for 42 thrombotic events. On bivariate analysis, recent diagnosis of cancer, interventional radiology placement, chemotherapy administration, number of lumens and PICC-gauge were associated with PICC-DVT. Following multivariable adjustment, recent cancer diagnosis (OR 1.95 [95% CI 1.01-3.76]) and PICC gauge (HR 2.21 [95%CI 1.04-4.70] and HR 3.56 [95%CI 1.31-9.66] for 5-Fr and 6-Fr PICCs, respectively) remained associated with thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Recent diagnosis of cancer and PICC gauge are associated with PICC-DVT. These findings have important clinical ramifications and suggest that placement of large gauge PICCs or PICCs in patients with cancer may provoke thrombosis. Improved policies and procedural oversights in these areas appear necessary to prevent PICC-DVT.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/etiologia , Idoso , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Michigan , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Razão de Chances , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/diagnóstico por imagem , Veteranos
4.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol ; 110(4): 491-4, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27308173

RESUMO

Solid deuterium (sD2) will be used for the production of ultra-cold neutrons (UCN) in a new generation of UCN sources. Scattering cross sections of UCN in sD2 determine the source yield but until now have not been investigated. We report first results from transmission and scattering experiments with cold, very cold and ultra-cold neutrons on sD2 along with light transmission and Raman scattering studies showing the influence of the sD2 crystal properties.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...