Preoperative DLCO predicts severe early complications after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Severe early complications are common after liver transplantation (LT) and are a key determinant of LT-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess whether lung function measured in the pre-operative period predicted complicated outcomes in the first month after LT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with mild-to-moderate liver disease (Model for End stage Liver Disease-MELD score≤30) who underwent LT between October 2015 and May 2020 in a single centre were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of severe early complications after LT defined by mechanical ventilation duration > 2 days or length of ICU stay > 7 days or reintubation or death < 1 month after LT. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were included (age 59 [53-64] years, 72 % men). Forty patients (33 %) had early complications after LT. Measured and%predicted hemoglobin-corrected lung transfer capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCOc) were significantly lower in patients with severe early complications after LT. DLCOc was the only variable that associated independently with severe early complications by multivariate analysis. DLCOc under 16.3 ml.min-1.mmHg-1 predicted respiratory complications with a sensitivity of 67.5 % and a specificity of 62.9 %. DLCOc%pred under 61.5 % had a sensitivity of 56.8 % and a specificity of 72 %. DLCOc independently associated with forced vital capacity (FVC), pulmonary emphysema, and the muscle mass index. CONCLUSION: A decrease in DLCOc indicated an increased risk of severe early complications after LT.

French survey of sedation practices for pediatric magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tompgraphy (CT) require patient immobility and therefore often require sedation or general anesthesia of patients. Consensus on these procedures is lacking in France. OBJECTIVE: Thus, the aim of this study was to describe the current sedation practices for pediatric MRI and CT in France. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2019 to December 2019, an online questionnaire was delivered by electronic mail to a representative radiologist in 60 pediatric radiology centers registered by the French-speaking pediatric and prenatal imaging society. Questions included protocols, drugs used, monitoring and side effects. RESULTS: Representatives of 40 of the 60 (67%) radiology centers responded to the survey. Among them, 31 performed sedation including 17 (55%) centers where radiologists performed sedation without anesthesiologists present during the procedure. The premedication drugs were hydroxyzine (n = 8, 80%) and melatonin (n = 2, 20%), Sedation drugs used for children ages 0 to 6 years old were pentobarbital (n = 9, 60%), midazolam (n = 2, 13%), chloral hydrate (n = 2, 13%), diazepam (n = 1, 6.5%) and chlorpromazine (n = 1, 6.5%). A written sedation protocol was available in 10/17 (59%) centers. In 6/17 (35%) centers, no monitoring was used during the procedures. Blood pressure monitoring and capnography were rarely used (< 10%) and post-sedation monitoring was heterogeneous. No life-threatening adverse effect was reported, but 6 centers reported at least one incident per year. CONCLUSION: For half of the responding radiology centers, radiologists performed sedation alone in agreement with the local anesthesiology team. Sedation procedures and monitoring were heterogenous among centers. Adjustment and harmonization of the practices according to the capacity of each center may be useful.

Variation of the SOFA score and mortality in patients with severe burns: A cohort study.

Multiple organ failure (MOF) is the leading cause of death in patients with burns requiring ICU admission. Quantifying the evolution of MOF, with the SOFA score, over the first few days after a severe burn may provide useful prognostic information. This retrospective cohort study aimed at evaluating the association between the evolution of the SOFA score between day 0 and day 3 and in-hospital mortality. All patients admitted for severe burns at the burn ICU of the Tours University Hospital between 2017 and 2020 and who stayed 3 days or more were included. Severe burns included: total body surface area burned (TBSA) ≥ 20 % or burns of any surface associated with one or more of the following items: (1) organ failure, (2) clinically significant smoke inhalation and/or cyanide poisoning, (3) severe preexisting comorbidities, (4) complex and specialized burn wound care. DeltaSOFA was defined as day 3 minus day 0 SOFA. One hundred and thirty-six patients were included. Median age was 52 years (38-70), median TBSA burned was 24 % (20-38), median day 0 SOFA was 2 (0-4) and median day 3 SOFA was 1 (0-5). In-hospital mortality was 10 %. There was a significant association between deltaSOFA and mortality that persisted after adjustment for age and TBSA (HR 1.37, 95 %CI 1.09-1.72, p < 0.01). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the prediction of mortality by day 0 SOFA and deltaSOFA were 0.79 (95 %CI 0.69-0.89) and 0.83 (95 %CI 0.70-0.95) respectively. After exclusion of patients with TBSA burned< 15 %, deltaSOFA remained independently associated with mortality (HR 1.42 95 %CI 1.09-1.85, p < 0.01). In addition, SOFA variations allowed the identification of subgroups of patients with either very low or very high mortality. In patients with severe burns, SOFA score evolution between day 0 and day 3 may be useful for individualized medical and ethical decisions. Further multicenter studies are required to corroborate the present results.

Effect of intravenous almitrine on intubation or mortality in patients with COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Severe hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia might result from hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, contributing to ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. Because almitrine improves V/Q, it might reduce the risk for mechanical ventilation (MV) in such patients. Our primary objective was to determine the effect of almitrine on the need for MV at day 7. Methods: In a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial involving 15 ICUs, patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia and experiencing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were randomly assigned to receive 5 days of intravenous low-dose (2 µg.kg-1.min-1) almitrine or placebo. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation for MV or death within 7 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, number of ventilator-free days, number of days in the ICU and the hospital, and treatment discontinuation for pre-specified adverse effects. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04357457. Findings: Between September 3, 2020 and September 25, 2021 181 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to almitrine (n=89) or placebo (n=92). 179 patients (excluding two who withdrew from the study) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean age: 60·1 years; 34% women) and analyzed. On day 7, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 patients assigned to almitrine (36%) and in 37 patients assigned to placebo (41%), for a difference of -4·3% (95% confidence interval: -18·7% to 10·2%). Secondary outcomes (28-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days at day 28, days in the ICU and the hospital, and treatment discontinuation for pre-specified adverse effects) did not differ between the two groups. Interpretation: In patients with COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, low-dose almitrine failed in reducing the need for MV or death at day 7. Funding: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC COVID 2020) funded by the French Ministry of Health, Les Laboratoires Servier (Suresnes, France) providing the study drug free of charge.

High-flow nasal oxygenation or standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation in patients at risk of hypoxaemia: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ODEPHI trial).

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether high-flow nasal oxygen could reduce the incidence of decreased peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) compared with standard oxygen in patients at risk of hypoxaemia undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation. METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with blinded assessment of the primary outcome evaluating high-flow nasal oxygen (gas flow 70 L min-1, inspired oxygen fraction 0.50) or standard oxygen delivered via nasal cannula or face mask (6 L min-1) or nasopharyngeal tube (5 L min-1) in patients at risk of hypoxaemia (i.e. >60 yr old, or with underlying cardiac or respiratory disease, or with ASA physical status >1, or with obesity or sleep apnoea syndrome) undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SpO2 ≤92%. Secondary outcomes included prolonged or severe desaturations, need for manoeuvres to maintain free upper airways, and other adverse events. RESULTS: In 379 patients, a decrease in SpO2 ≤92% occurred in 9.4% (18/191) for the high-flow nasal oxygen group, and 33.5% (63/188) for the standard oxygen groups (adjusted absolute risk difference, -23.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), -28.9 to -16.7]; P<0.001). Prolonged desaturation (>1 min) and manoeuvres to maintain free upper airways were less frequent in the high-flow nasal oxygen group than in the standard oxygen group (7.3% vs 14.9%, P=.02, and 11.1% vs 32.4%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk of hypoxaemia undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation, use of high-flow nasal oxygen significantly reduced the incidence of peripheral oxygen desaturation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03829293.

The A2B trial, antibiotic prophylaxis for excision-graft surgery in burn patients: a multicenter randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: The indication for antibiotic prophylaxis in burn patients remains highly controversial, with no consensus having been reached. The objective of antibiotic prophylaxis is to reduce the risk of postoperative local and systemic infections. Burn surgery is associated with a high incidence of bacteremia, postoperative infections, and sepsis. However, antibiotic prophylaxis exposes patients to the risk of selecting drug-resistant pathogens as well as to the adverse effects of antibiotics (i.e., Clostridium difficile colitis). The lack of data precludes any strong international recommendations regarding perioperative prophylaxis using systemic antibiotics in this setting. The goal of this project is therefore to determine whether perioperative systemic antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of postoperative infections in burn patients. METHODS: The A2B trial is a multicenter (10 centers), prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. The trial will involve the recruitment of 506 adult burn patients with a total body surface area (TBSA) burn of between 5 and 40% and requiring at least one excision-graft surgery for deep burn injury. Participants will be randomized to receive antibiotic prophylaxis (antibiotic prophylaxis group) or a placebo (control group) 30 min before the incision of the first two surgeries. The primary outcome will be the occurrence of postoperative infections defined as postoperative sepsis and/or surgical site infection and/or graft lysis requiring a new graft within 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include mortality at day 90 postrandomization, skin graft lysis requiring a new graft procedure, postoperative bacteremia (within 48 h of surgery), postoperative sepsis, postoperative surgical site infection, number of hospitalizations until complete healing (> 95% TBSA), number of hospitalization days living without antibiotic therapy at day 28 and day 90, and multiresistant bacterial colonization or infection at day 28 and day 90. DISCUSSION: The trial aims to provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis for excision-graft surgery in burn patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04292054 . Registered on 2 March 2020.

Bacterial Pneumonia in Brain-Dead Patients: Clinical Features and Impact on Lung Suitability for Donation.

OBJECTIVES: To appraise the epidemiological features of bacterial pneumonia and its impact on lung suitability for donation in brain-dead patients managed with protective ventilatory settings. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Six ICUs from two university-affiliated hospitals. PATIENTS: Brain-dead adult patients managed in the participating ICUs over a 4-year period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 231 included patients, 145 (62.8%) were classified as ideal or extended-criteria potential lung donors at ICU admission and the remaining 86 patients having baseline contraindication for donation. Culture-proven aspiration pneumonia and early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia occurred in 54 patients (23.4%) and 15 patients (6.5%), respectively (overall pneumonia incidence, 29.9%). Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales were the most common pathogens. Using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard models, age (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI [0.96-0.99]), anoxic brain injury (3.55 [1.2-10.5]), aspiration (2.29 [1.22-4.29]), and not receiving antimicrobial agents at day 1 (3.56 [1.94-6.53]) were identified as independent predictors of pneumonia occurrence in the whole study population. Analyses restricted to potential lung donors yielded similar results. Pneumonia was associated with a postadmission decrease in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio and lower values at brain death, in the whole study population (estimated marginal mean, 294 [264-323] vs 365 [346-385] mm Hg in uninfected patients; p = 0.0005) as in potential lung donors (299 [248-350] vs 379 [350-408] mm Hg; p = 0.04; linear mixed models). Lungs were eventually retrieved in 31 patients (34.4%) among the 90 potential lung donors with at least one other organ harvested (pneumonia prevalence in lung donors (9.7%) vs nondonors (49.2%); p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonia occurs in one-third of brain-dead patients and appears as the main reason for lung nonharvesting in those presenting as potential lung donors. The initiation of antimicrobial prophylaxis upon the first day of the ICU stay in comatose patients with severe brain injury could enlarge the pool of actual lung donors.

High-flow nasal oxygenation versus standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation. The prospective multicentre randomised controlled ODEPHI study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoxaemia is a major complication during gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) procedures (upper/lower) when performed under deep sedation in the procedure room. Standard oxygen therapy (SOT) is used to prevent hypoxaemia. Data suggest that risk factors for hypoxaemia under deep sedation during GIE are obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, a body mass index above 30 kg/m², high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, age over 60 years old, high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class and the association of upper and lower GIE. High-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) may potentially improve oxygenation during GIE under deep sedation. We hypothesised that HFNO could decrease the incidence of hypoxaemia in comparison with SOT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ODEPHI (High-flow nasal oxygenation versus standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation. The prospective multicentre randomised controlled) study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing HFNO to SOT during GIE (upper and/or lower) under deep sedation administered by anaesthesiologists in the procedure room. Three hundred and eighty patients will be randomised with a 1:1 ratio in two parallel groups.The primary outcome is the occurrence of hypoxaemia, defined by a pulse oximetry measurement of peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) below or equal to 92% during the GIE procedure. Secondary outcomes include prolonged hypoxaemia, severe hypoxaemia, need for manoeuvres to maintain upper airway patency and other adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the ethics committee (CPP Sud Est Paris V, France), and patients are included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. As provided for by French law, patients participating in the study are informed that they have the possibility to ask the investigators, once the study is completed, to be informed of the overall results of the study. Thus, a summary of the results will be sent by post to the participants on request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03829293).

Evaluation of the efficacy of a self-training programme in focus cardiac ultrasound with simulator.

BACKGROUND: Focus cardiac ultrasound is a great tool for quick evaluation of cardiac function in acute settings with limited time and expertise in echocardiography. Adequate training is essential for physicians willing to use this imaging technique. AIM: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of a self-training programme using a cardiac ultrasound simulator. METHODS: Thirty-five trainees in cardiology, emergency medicine or anaesthesiology entered the programme, which started with an e-learning lecture on focus cardiac ultrasound, with practice on a simulator, followed by implementation on patients, and ended with self-training in image analysis on an online platform. A post-test evaluation was carried out at the end of the theoretical training, followed by a final live evaluation on patients (timed acquisition of the five reference views used in focus cardiac ultrasound, grading each view on a scale of 1 to 5). Trainees were also evaluated online regarding their interpretation of 20 video clips. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) interpretability scores following simulator training were 5 (4-5) for the parasternal long-axis view, 5 (4-5) for the apical four-chamber view, and 4 (4-5) for the subcostal window. Interpretability was significantly inferior in the live evaluation compared with the post-test evaluation, except for the parasternal long-axis and subcostal views. The mean score for the video clips (out of 20) was 14.5±2.4. CONCLUSIONS: After a short self-training programme, trainees were able to acquire the main views of focus cardiac ultrasound with sufficient quality and in a short time period.

Thiopental versus propofol on the outcome of the newborn after caesarean section: An impact study.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, the company that produced thiopental in France and in the United States stopped its marketing. Because of limited evidences, the choice of the best induction agent for caesarean section remains controversial, especially in emergency. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of propofol versus thiopental on the Apgar score of the newborn. METHODS: Newborns delivered by elective or emergency caesarean section under general anaesthesia in a university hospital were included from January 2009 to December 2013. Two periods, according to the hypnotic drug used, were compared in this before-and-after comparative study: thiopental before May 2011 and propofol after. The primary outcome was to compare the proportion of newborns with a 5-minute Apgar Score < 7 between both groups. RESULTS: 367 newborns were enrolled, 178 in thiopental group and 189 in propofol group. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The occurrence of a 5-minute Apgar Score less than 7 was not influenced by the use of propofol (OR 1.40 [CI 95% 0.90-2.20] P = 0.135). Blood gas analyses and admission's rate in neonatal intensive care unit were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopental and propofol do not appear to present significant difference in term of outcome of the newborn after caesarean section. In this situation, propofol may probably be a reliable alternative to the supply reduction of thiopental imposed by forces. Prospective studies are required to confirm the safety of propofol, particularly in the long term.

Enhanced Amikacin Diffusion With Ultrasound and Microbubbles in a Mechanically Ventilated Condensed Lung Rabbit Model.

The poor diffusion of intravenous antibiotics in lung tissue makes nosocomial pneumonia challenging to treat, notably in critical patients under mechanical ventilation. The combination of ultrasound and microbubbles (USMB) is an emerging method for non-invasive and targeted enhancement of uptake of various drugs in several organs. This study aims to evaluate if USMB may increase amikacin concentration in condensed lung tissues in a mechanically ventilated rabbit model. When applied 60 or 160 min after the beginning of an intravenous amikacin infusion, USMB increased amikacin concentration in the condensed lung tissue by 1.33 (p = 0.025) or 1.56-fold (p = 0.028) respectively. When applied 70 min after the beginning of an intravenous amikacin infusion, USMB increased amikacin concentration in the muscle tissue by 2.52 (p = 0.025). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that USMB is a promising method for the targeted delivery of amikacin in mechanically ventilated condensed lung, thus opening new therapeutic fields against lung infections.

Anxiety during inhalation induction in paediatrics: Sitting versus supine position, a randomised trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluated if the sitting or supine positions affect anxiety levels induced by the application of a facemask in children. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised study. SETTING: Paediatric hospital, operating room. PATIENTS: Two to twelve years old children, 1-3 ASA status, undergoing inhalation anaesthesia for elective surgery. INTERVENTION: Children were randomly assigned to a sitting or supine position. After monitoring equipment was established, inhalation was inducted by the application of the mask. MEASUREMENTS: Child anxiety was then assessed with the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) before the application of the facemask and following mask application. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 99 children in the sitting group and 103 in the supine group were analysed. The mYPAS score was not different in both groups before the application of facemask (40 [28-51] versus 40 [28-53]; P=0.99). It increased (P=0.005) to a similar extent in both groups following mask application without difference between groups (48 [38-60] versus 48 [35-63]; P=0.95). Side effects were not different between both groups. CONCLUSION: In children undergoing inhalation induction, sitting or supine positions did not modify anxiety induced by the application of a facemask, nor adverse effects; therefore, children should be allowed to choose their preferred position.

Evaluation and comparison of epidural analgesia in labour related information on French and English-speaking websites.

OBJECTIVES: The medical information on the Internet is better in English than in other languages. The information about Epidural Analgesia In Labour (EAIL) available on French-speaking websites is of poor quality. The quality of the information about EAIL should be better in English, but there is no comparison available. This study has assessed and compared the quality of the information about EAIL available on French and English-speaking websites. METHOD: Keywords "epidural", "épidurale" and/or "péridurale" were used in the French, Canadian and American Google® and Yahoo® search engines. Two independent assessors assessed the 20 first websites for each engine search. They used an evaluation form created from French, Canadian and American recommendations. This form assessed the structure quality (Structure Score/25) and the medical information quality (Medical Information Score/30) of the websites. The addition of both scores gives the Global Score (/55). RESULTS: Seventy-one websites were assessed, 39 French-speaking and 32 English-speaking websites. Structure, Medical Information and Global Scores (expressed as mean (SD)) were respectively 11 (4), 13 (5), 24 (8) for the French-speaking websites and 11 (4), 12 (4), 23 (7) for the English-speaking websites. There was no statistical significant difference between both languages. CONCLUSION: Information about EAIL available on French and English-speaking websites is of poor quality and there is no difference in the information quality, whatever the language. A consideration on Internet medical information improvement is needed. A high quality dedicated website should be created and broadcasted.

COBI (COntinuous hyperosmolar therapy for traumatic Brain-Injured patients) trial protocol: a multicentre randomised open-label trial with blinded adjudication of primary outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and severe prolonged disability. Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a critical risk factor of bad outcomes after TBI. Continuous infusion of hyperosmolar therapy has been proposed for the prevention and the treatment of ICH. Whether an early administration of continuous hyperosmolar therapy improves long-term outcomes of patients with TBI is uncertain. The aim of the COBI study (number clinicaltrial.gov 03143751, pre-results stage) is to assess the efficiency and the safety of continuous hyperosmolar therapy in patients with TBI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COBI (COntinuous hyperosmolar therapy in traumatic Brain-Injured patients) trial is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, two-arms study with blinded adjudication of primary outcome. Three hundred and seventy patients hospitalised in intensive care unit with a TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12 and abnormal brain CT scan) are randomised in the first 24 hours following trauma to standard care or continuous hyperosmolar therapy (20% NaCl) plus standard care. Continuous hyperosmolar therapy is maintained for at least 48 hours in the treatment group and continued for as long as is necessary to prevent ICH. The primary outcome is the score on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months. The treatment effect is estimated with ordinal logistic regression adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors and expressed as a common OR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The COBI trial protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of Paris Ile de France VIII and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. The COBI trial is the first randomised controlled trial powered to investigate whether continuous hyperosmolar therapy in patients with TBI improve long-term recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Trial registration number is NCT03143751.

Glidescope versus Airtraq DL for double-lumen tracheal tube insertion in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway: A randomised study.

BACKGROUND: Double-lumen tracheal tube (DLT) insertion can be managed with videolaryngoscopes such as the Glidescope or indirect laryngoscopes like the Airtraq DL. No study has compared both devices when a difficult intubation is predicted. OBJECTIVE: Our hypothesis was that the Glidescope is superior to the Airtraq for double-lumen tube insertion in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway. DESIGN: Randomised study. PATIENTS: Adults scheduled for thoracic elective surgery, requiring one-lung ventilation with a predicted difficult intubation score of at least 7 (Arné risk index). INTERVENTION: Between March 2014 and March 2015, adult patients, scheduled for elective thoracic surgery, requiring double-lumen tracheal tube placement, and with a predicted risk (evaluated preoperatively using the Arné score) or a history of difficult intubation, were allocated to a Glidescope or an Airtraq group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the overall success rate of tracheal intubation after two attempts. Secondary outcomes were success rates on the first attempt, duration of intubation, need for laryngeal pressure, Cormack and Lehane grade and side-effects. RESULTS: Of 277 patients, 78 were predicted to have a difficult airway. Finally, 72 patients were enrolled. Neither the overall success rates of tracheal intubation [Glidescope group 31/36 (86%) versus Airtraq group 34/36 (94%), P = 0.43] nor the side-effects differed between groups. There was no difference concerning visualisation of the glottis using the Cormack and Lehane grade (P = 0.18) or intubation time [Glidescope group 67 s (49 to 90) versus Airtraq group 81 s (59 to 101), P = 0.28]. All patients with a previous history of difficult intubation were intubated successfully. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in success rates of tracheal intubation with a double-lumen tube in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway when using either a Glidescope or Airtraq device. TRIAL REGISTRATION: National register of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety No. 2014-A00143-44.

Mandibular nerve block can improve intraoperative inferior alveolar nerve visualization during sagittal split mandibular osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: The main procedure specific complication of sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus (SSOMR) is inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. This can be produced by poor intraoperative visibility of the IAN due to bone bleeding. In our centre, mandibular nerve blocks (MNBs) are usually performed for intra- and post-operative analgesia. We observed that MNB seems to decrease intraoperative bleeding and thus to improve IAN visibility. Our study was performed to evaluate the effect of MNB on intraoperative bleeding during SSOMR and, secondarily, on the duration of this procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients scheduled for bilateral SSOMR under general anaesthesia were prospectively randomized into two groups. The Block group received bilateral MNB (5 mL ropivacaine 0.5% for each block) and the Control group sham MNBs (bilateral cutaneous puncture, without block). The operations were carried out under a standardised general anaesthetic. Post-operatively, the surgeon, blinded to group allocation, assessed intraoperative bone bleeding using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0: no bleeding, perfect visibility to 100: major bleeding, no visibility). Osteotomy duration, intraoperative anaesthetic requirements, and pain score in the recovery room were also recorded. Results are expressed as median [25-75th percentiles]. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in each group. Osteotomy under MNB had a decreased intraoperative bone bleeding score compared with controls (20 [0-40] versus 55 [20-80], p=0.0002). They had a dry surgical field more frequently (29% versus 5%, p=0.01), and a shorter mean time for the osteotomy (15 [12.25-17.75] versus 17.5 [15-21]min, p=0.009). Block patients had reduced intraoperative opioid consumption (770 [678-1430] versus 2310 [1908-3058]mcg of remifentanil, p=0.0001), and lower pain scores in the recovery room (0 [0-2] versus 3 [1-5], p=0.12). CONCLUSION: MNB decreases intraoperative bone bleeding during SSOMR under general anaesthesia. Three hypotheses to explain this result are discussed.