Image quality of lung perfusion with photon-counting-detector CT: comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of lung perfusion imaging obtained with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT (DECT). METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive patients scanned with PCD-CT were compared to a paired population scanned with dual-energy on a 3rd-generation DS-CT scanner using (a) for DS-CT (Group 1): collimation: 64 × 0.6 × 2 mm; pitch: 0.55; (b) for PCD-CT (Group 2): collimation: 144 × 0.4 mm; pitch: 1.5; single-source acquisition. The injection protocol was similar in both groups with the reconstruction of perfusion images by subtraction of high- and low-energy virtual monoenergetic images. RESULTS: Compared to Group 1, Group 2 examinations showed: (a) a shorter duration of data acquisition (0.93 ± 0.1 s vs 3.98 ± 0.35 s; p < 0.0001); (b) a significantly lower dose-length-product (172.6 ± 55.14 vs 339.4 ± 75.64 mGy·cm; p < 0.0001); and (c) a higher level of objective noise (p < 0.0001) on mediastinal images. On perfusion images: (a) the mean level of attenuation did not differ (p = 0.05) with less subjective image noise in Group 2 (p = 0.049); (b) the distribution of scores of fissure visualization differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a higher proportion of fissures sharply delineated in Group 2 (n = 60; 84.5% vs n = 26; 26.6%); (c) the rating of cardiac motion artifacts differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a predominance of examinations rated with mild artifacts in Group 2 (n = 69; 97.2%) while the most Group 1 examinations showed moderate artifacts (n = 52; 73.2%). CONCLUSION: PCD-CT acquisitions provided similar morphologic image quality and superior perfusion imaging at lower radiation doses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The improvement in the overall quality of perfusion images at lower radiation doses opens the door for wider applications of lung perfusion imaging in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: The speed of data acquisition with PCD-CT accounts for mild motion artifacts. Sharply delineated fissures are depicted on PCD-CT perfusion images. High-quality perfusion imaging was obtained with a 52% dose reduction.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Clinical and Imaging Evaluation.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a complication of pulmonary embolism and is an important cause of pulmonary hypertension. As a clinical entity, it is frequently underdiagnosed with prolonged diagnostic delays. This study reviews the clinical and radiographic findings associated with CTEPH to improve awareness and recognition. Strengths and limitations of multiple imaging modalities are reviewed. Accompanying images are provided to supplement the text and provide examples of important findings for the reader.

Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: when photon-counting-detector CT replaces energy-integrating-detector CT in daily routine.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic approach of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) and energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cohorts underwent CT angiographic examinations with EID-CT (Group 1; n = 158) and PCD-CT (Group 2; n = 172), (b) with two options in Group 1, dual energy (Group 1a) or single energy (Group 1b) and a single option in Group 2 (spectral imaging with single source). RESULTS: In Group 2, all patients benefited from spectral imaging, only accessible to 105 patients (66.5%) in Group 1, with a mean acquisition time significantly shorter (0.9 ± 0.1 s vs 4.0 ± 0 .3 s; p < 0.001) and mean values of CTDIvol and DLP reduced by 46.3% and 47.7%, respectively. Comparing the quality of 70 keV (Group 2) and averaged (Group 1a) images: (a) the mean attenuation within pulmonary arteries did not differ (p = 0.13); (b) the image noise was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in Group 2 with no difference in subjective image noise (p = 0.29); and (c) 89% of examinations were devoid of artifacts in Group 2 vs 28.6% in Group 1a. The percentage of diagnostic examinations was 95.2% (100/105; Group 1a), 100% (53/53; Group 1b), and 95.3% (164/172; Group 2). There were 4.8% (5/105; Group 1a) and 4.7% (8/172; Group 2) of non-diagnostic examinations, mainly due to the suboptimal quality of vascular opacification with the restoration of a diagnostic image quality on low-energy images. CONCLUSION: Compared to EID-CT, morphology and perfusion imaging were available in all patients scanned with PCD-CT, with the radiation dose reduced by 48%. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: PCD-CT enables scanning patients with the advantages of both spectral imaging, including high-quality morphologic imaging and lung perfusion for all patients, and fast scanning-a combination that is not simultaneously accessible with EID-CT while reducing the radiation dose by almost 50%.

Photon-counting CT in Thoracic Imaging: Early Clinical Evidence and Incorporation Into Clinical Practice.

Photon-counting CT (PCCT) is an emerging advanced CT technology that differs from conventional CT in its ability to directly convert incident x-ray photon energies into electrical signals. The detector design also permits substantial improvements in spatial resolution and radiation dose efficiency and allows for concurrent high-pitch and high-temporal-resolution multienergy imaging. This review summarizes (a) key differences in PCCT image acquisition and image reconstruction compared with conventional CT; (b) early evidence for the clinical benefit of PCCT for high-spatial-resolution diagnostic tasks in thoracic imaging, such as assessment of airway and parenchymal diseases, as well as benefits of high-pitch and multienergy scanning; (c) anticipated radiation dose reduction, depending on the diagnostic task, and increased utility for routine low-dose thoracic CT imaging; (d) adaptations for thoracic imaging in children; (e) potential for further quantitation of thoracic diseases; and (f) limitations and trade-offs. Moreover, important points for conducting and interpreting clinical studies examining the benefit of PCCT relative to conventional CT and integration of PCCT systems into multivendor, multispecialty radiology practices are discussed.