Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy: Comparison of 16-Gauge versus 14-Gauge Needle and the Effect of Coaxial Guidance in 1065 Breast Biopsies - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is considered the standard assessment to diagnose sonographically visible suspicious breast mass lesions. Based on nonrandomized trials, the current German guidelines recommend at least three cylinders with ≤ 14-gauge needle biopsy. However, no recommendation is made as to how many specimens are needed with a smaller needle size, such as 16-gauge, or if biopsy with coaxial guidance improves diagnostic accuracy and quality. Therefore, in a prospective monocentric unblinded randomized controlled clinical noninferiority trial, the diagnostic accuracy of 16-gauge versus 14-gauge core needle biopsy, with and without coaxial guidance, was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1065 breast biopsies were included in order to analyze the number of core samples necessary to obtain an appropriate rate of diagnostic quality adequate for histological evaluation, and to achieve high diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic yield. Histological results were verified by surgery or long-term follow-up of at least two years up to five years. RESULTS: In order to obtain an additive diagnostic accuracy of > 99 %, a minimum of two cylinders with 14-gauge biopsy were required. The diagnostic accuracy and the diagnostic quality of 14-gauge biopsy were not affected by the coaxial technique. When performing a 16-gauge biopsy, five cylinders were required to achieve an additive diagnostic accuracy of > 99 %. Without coaxial guidance, 16-gauge CNB required at least three samples, whereas five needle passes with coaxial-guided 16-gauge biopsy were needed. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy and quality of ultrasound-guided 16-gauge core needle biopsy were inferior to the 14-gauge needle size, regardless of the use of a coaxial technique.

Ultrasound-Assisted Tumor Surgery in Breast Cancer - A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study (MAC 001).

PURPOSE: Breast-conserving therapy is associated with a risk of tumor-involved margins. For intraoperative orientation, non- palpable or indistinctly palpable lesions are wire-marked prior to surgery. Ultrasound-guided surgery has the potential to reduce the number of tumor-involved margins. In the MAC 001 trial we evaluated ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery compared to wire-guided surgery with regard to free tumor margins, duration of surgery and resection volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, prospective, single-center controlled trial, patients with ductal invasive breast cancer were recruited for either ultrasound-guided or wire localization surgery. Primary outcomes were tumor-free resection margins, the reoperation rate and the resection volume in each group. The results were analyzed by intention to treat. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02222675. RESULTS: 56 patients were assessed, and 47 patients were evaluated in the trial. 93 % (25/27) of the patients in the ultrasound arm had an R0 reoperation compared to 65 % (13/20) in the wire localization control arm. This result was statistically significant (p = 0.026). No statistical difference was found for the resection volume or the duration of surgery between the two arms. No major complication was seen in either arm. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-assisted breast surgery significantly increases the possibility of tumor-free margins and therefore reduces the risk of reoperations. Breast surgeons should be trained in ultrasound and ultrasound should be available in every breast surgery operating room.

Prediction of Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastases After Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Nomograms.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Only 30-50% of patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases present with further axillary lymph node metastases. Therefore, up to 70% of patients with positive SLN are overtreated by axillary dissection (AD) and may suffer from complications such as sensory disturbances or lymphedema. According to the current S3 guidelines, AD can be avoided in patients with a T1/T2 tumor if breast-conserving surgery with subsequent tangential irradiation is performed and no more than two SLNs are affected. Additionally, use of nomograms, that predict the probability of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases, is recommended. Therefore, models for the prediction of NSLN metastases in our defined population were constructed and compared with the published nomograms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 2,146 primary breast cancer patients, who underwent SLN biopsy at the University Women's Hospital in Tuebingen, were evaluated by dividing the patient group in a training and validation collective (TC or VC). Using the SLN-positive TC patients, three models for the prediction of the likelihood of NSLN metastases were adapted and were then validated using the SLN-positive VC patients. In addition, the predictive power of nomograms from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), Stanford, and the Cambridge model were compared with regard to our patient collective. RESULTS: A total of 2,146 patients were included in the study. Of these, 470 patients had positive SLN, 295 consisted the training collective and 175 consisted the validation collective. In a regression model, three variants - with 11, 6 and 2 variables - were developed for the prediction of NSLN metastases in our defined population and compared to the most frequently used nomograms. Our variants with 11 and with 6 variables were proven to be a particularly suitable model and showed similarly good results as the published MSKCC nomogram. CONCLUSION: Our developed nomograms may be used as a prediction tool for NSLN metastases after positive SLN.

Electrochemotherapy - Supplementary Treatment for Loco-regional Metastasized Breast Carcinoma Administered to Concomitant Systemic Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is an established procedure for treating breast cancer loco-regional recurrences following surgical intervention and/or radiotherapy. Limited information is available on ECT application as a concomitant procedure to systemic therapy in recurrent breast cancer. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the application of ECT in close temporal relation to systemic chemotherapy could lead to increased local and/or systemic side effects. For this purpose we evaluated the safety of ECT as a supplemental local therapy to systemic therapy. ECT local and systemic toxicity and side effects were recorded and whether the anticipated local therapeutic effect of ECT would be influenced by the concomitant use of systemic therapies was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is an observational study. Thirty three patients with loco-regional metastasized breast carcinoma were treated and observed over a period of three years with 46 ECT applications for local tumour control in addition to established systemic therapy. A specific timeline for ECT administration was not fixed up, but was generally performed one week before the following chemotherapy administration with the aim to avoid the so called nadir, this means the peak period with risk of neutropenia. RESULTS: Data was collected over a period of three years on a population of 33 metastatic patients. Fifteen patients, received neo-adjuvant therapy as part of their primary treatment, but still had an advanced stage tumour. Some patients received repeated ECT applications. Objective tumour response was observed in 90% of the treated patients. Patients showed no increased local toxicity, especially no higher dermal toxicity, e.g. formation of local necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: ECT proved to be an effective supplement to a cytotoxic systemic therapy, especially for high-risk patients who did not respond well to systemic therapy of loco-regional metastases, without creating any greater systemic or loco-regional toxicities.

Prognostic relevance of induced and spontaneous apoptosis of disseminated tumor cells in primary breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: An imbalance between cell proliferation and programmed cell death can result in tumor growth. Although most systemic cytotoxic agents induce apoptosis in tumor cells, a high apoptotic rate in primary breast cancer correlates with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and the prognostic significance of apoptotic disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow (BM) of breast cancer patients who either underwent primary surgery or primary systemic chemotherapy (PST). METHODS: A total of 383 primary breast cancer patients with viable DTC in the BM were included into this study. Eighty-five patients were initially treated with primary systemic chemotherapy whereas 298 patients underwent surgery first. Detection of apoptotic DTC were performed by immunocytochemistry using the M30 antibody which detects a neo-epitope expressed after caspase cleavage of cytokeratin 18 during early apoptosis. The median follow up was 44 months (range 10-88 months). RESULTS: Eighty-two of 298 (27%) primary operated patients and 41 of 85 (48%) patients treated with primary systemic systemic therapy had additional apoptotic DTC (M30 positive). In the neoadjuvant group M30-positive patients were less likely to suffer relapse than those without apoptotic DTC (7% vs. 23% of the events, p=0.049). In contrast, the detection of apoptotic DTC in patients treated by primary surgery was significantly associated with poor overall survival (5% vs. 12% of the events, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Apoptotic DTC can be detected in breast cancer patients before and after systemic treatment. The presence of apoptotic DTC in patients with PST may be induced by the cytotoxic agents. Thus, both spontaneous and chemotherapy-induced apoptosis may have different prognostic significance.

Detection and clinical relevance of hematogenous tumor cell dissemination in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Hematogenous tumor cell dissemination is a crucial step in systemic disease progression and predicts reduced clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. Only invasive cancers are assumed to shed tumor cells into the bloodstream and infiltrate lymph nodes. However, recent studies revealed that disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) may be detected in bone marrow (BM) of patients with preinvasive lesions, i.e., ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The purpose of this analysis was to examine the incidence and clinical value of DTC detection in a large series of patients with pure DCIS. 404 patients treated for DCIS at the University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany were included into this analysis. BM was analyzed by immunocytochemistry (pancytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3) using ACIS system (Chromavision) according to the ISHAGE evaluation criteria. Sentinel nodes were analyzed in 316 patients by step sectioning and hematoxylin-eosin staining. DTCs were detected in 63 of 404 patients (16 %). No correlation was observed between BM status and tumor size, grading, histology or Van Nuys prognostic index. In two cases, metastatic spread into lymph nodes was observed; isolated tumor cells were found in one patient. After a median follow-up of 45 months (range 3-131 months), 3 % of BM positive patients died compared to 1 % of BM negative patients (p = 0.254). Relapse of any kind was observed in 7 % of patients with DTCs vs. 5 % of patients without DTCs (p = 0.644). The differences in overall (p = 0.088) and disease-free survival (p = 0.982) calculated by log-rank test were not statistically significant. Tumor cell dissemination may be detected in patients diagnosed with DCIS. Whether these cells disseminate from real preinvasive mammary lesions or represent the earliest step of microinvasion, remains unclear. A longer follow-up may be necessary to accurately assess clinical value of these cells in DCIS patients.

Molecular detection of breast cancer metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR): identifying, evaluating and establishing multi-marker panels.

The potential advantage of using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) methodology to detect metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of breast cancer (BC) patients was evaluated in this prospective study. We measured the expression of relevant gene transcripts in SLNs using an innovative algorithm and compared the results of single-marker assays versus multi-marker assays with conventional histological detection methods. SLNs from women aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with unilateral BC were examined by haematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry and analysed for transcripts of several relevant genes using qRT-PCR (learning group). Four candidate panels of expressed transcript combinations with high sensitivity and specificity were selected for further investigation. The candidate panels were then validated using SLNs from a second group of BC patients (validation group). In the learning group, 74/314 SLN sections from 150 patients were positive for metastasis by histology. The transcripts analysed showed the following individual sensitivities/specificities: cytokeratin 19 (CK19) 94.6%/97.9%; mammaglobin 1 (MGB1) 82.4%/91.7%; mammaglobin 2 (MGB2) 82.4%/96.7%; carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) 71.6%/97.5%; EPCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) 91.9%/97.1%; and NY-BR-1 82.4%/93.8%. The optimal panel based on the predefined criteria comprised four markers: CK19, MGB1, EPCAM, and NY-BR-1, of which ≥ 2 had to be positive (95.9% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, 85.5% positive predictive value (PPV), and 98.7% negative predictive value (NPV)). Overall concordance with histology was 95.2%. In the validation group, 84/315 SLN sections from 235 patients were histologically positive, and panel sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy were 88.1, 95.2 and 93.3%, respectively, at the SLN section level. In conclusion, molecular staging using expression patterns of relevant transcripts in SLNs could serve as a useful complement to standard diagnostic work-up in BC patients. The proposed flexible multi-parametric approach does not improve the overall accuracy compared with the single-marker approach. However, it overcomes several limitations of the previously reported molecular assays for SLN diagnosis.