Biochemical markers of renal function and maternal hypothyroidism in early pregnancy.

Objective: The physiological adaptations during a normal pregnancy affect renal and thyroid function and levels of associated biochemical markers. An association between cystatin C (CysC), creatinine, and thyroid function has been considered in nonpregnant individuals but not in pregnant women specifically. Methods: Cohort study within the North Denmark Region Pregnancy Cohort (2011-2015) with assessment of thyroid function and autoantibodies (ADVIA Centaur XPT, Siemens Healthineers) in serum residues from the early pregnancy. Consecutive samples (n = 1112) were selected for measurement of CysC and creatinine (Atellica CH 930, Siemens Healthineers), and results were linked to information in Danish nationwide registers for (i) establishment of pregnancy-specific reference intervals for CysC and creatinine and (ii) evaluation of the prevalence of maternal hypothyroidism in early pregnancy according to levels of CysC and creatinine. Results: The established reference intervals (2.5-97.5 percentiles) differed by week of pregnancy (week 4-8, 9-11, 12-15) and were CysC: 0.58-0.92 mg/L; 0.54-0.91 mg/L; 0.52-0.86 mg/L; creatinine: 46.9-73.0 µmol/L; 42.0-68.4 µmol/L; 38.8-66.4 µmol/L. The prevalence of maternal autoimmune hypothyroidism in early pregnancy differed by the level of CysC and creatinine (<25th percentile; 25th-75th percentile; >75th percentile) and was for CysC 1.7%, 3.8%, 7.4% and for creatinine 2.5%, 4.1%, 7.1%. Conclusions: Reference intervals for CysC and creatinine were dynamic in early pregnancy and decreased with increasing gestational age. Furthermore, higher levels of CysC and creatinine associated with a higher prevalence of maternal autoimmune hypothyroidism. Results encourage considerations on the underlying mechanisms for the association between markers of renal and thyroid function.

The macrophage-related biomarkers sCD163 and sCD206 are released by different shedding mechanisms.

The hemoglobin receptor CD163 and the mannose receptor CD206 are both expressed on the surface of human macrophages. Upon inflammatory activation, the receptors are shed from the macrophage surface generating soluble products. The plasma concentration of both soluble CD163 (sCD163) and soluble CD206 (sCD206) are increased in several diseases, including inflammatory conditions and cancer. Here, we show that in contrast to CD163, LPS-mediated shedding of CD206 in humans is slow and a result of indirect signaling. Although both sCD163 and sCD206 were increased in response to LPS stimulation in vivo, only CD163 was shed from LPS-stimulated macrophages in vitro. Although both sCD163 and sCD206 were released from cultured macrophages stimulated with zymosan and PMA, shedding of CD206 was generally slower and less efficient and not reduced by inhibitors against the major protease classes. These data indicate that CD163 and CD206 are shed from the macrophages by very different mechanisms potentially involving distinctive inflammatory processes.

Macrophage markers soluble CD163 and soluble mannose receptor are associated with liver injury in patients with paracetamol overdose.

The macrophage activation markers, soluble CD163 (sCD163) and soluble mannose receptor (sMR), are associated with liver disease severity and prognosis. We aimed to investigate macrophage activation reflected by sMR and sCD163 in patients with mild and severe paracetamol (PCM) intoxication and effects of antidote treatment in patients and healthy controls. We measured sMR and sCD163 levels by in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in two independent prospective cohorts of PCM overdosed patients: 49 patients with early mild PCM overdose from Aarhus University Hospital and 30 patients with severe acute liver injury included at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. Furthermore, we investigated sMR and sCD163 in 14 healthy controls during N-acetylcysteine treatment. Within the mild PCM cohort, patients with elevated alanine transaminase on admission had significantly higher levels of sCD163 compared with patients with normal alanine transaminase (2.92[2.00-5.75] versus 1.29[1.02-1.69] mg/L, p = .009), whereas sMR showed no significant difference. In patients with acute liver injury, both markers were markedly higher compared to the mild PCM cohort (sCD163: 10.73[5.79-14.62] versus 1.34[1.06-1.96], p < .001; sMR: 0.80[0.63-1.14] versus 0.18[0.14-0.25], p < .001). Antidote treatment significantly reduced sCD163 levels in both PCM overdosed patients and healthy controls. In conclusion, macrophage activation assessed by the levels of sMR and sCD163 is associated with the degree of liver injury in patients with PCM intoxication and is ameliorated by antidote treatment, suggesting macrophage involvement in PCM-induced liver injury.

The soluble mannose receptor (sMR) is elevated in alcoholic liver disease and associated with disease severity, portal hypertension, and mortality in cirrhosis patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic macrophages (Kupffer cells) are involved in the immunopathology of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). The mannose receptor (MR, CD206), expressed primarily by macrophages, mediates endocytosis, antigen presentation and T-cell activation. A soluble form, sMR, has recently been identified in humans. We aimed to study plasma sMR levels and its correlation with disease severity and survival in ALD patients. METHODS: We included 50 patients with alcoholic hepatitis (AH), 68 alcoholic cirrhosis (AC) patients (Child-Pugh A (23), B (24), C (21)), and 21 healthy controls (HC). Liver status was described by the Glasgow Alcoholic Hepatitis Score (GAHS), Child-Pugh (CP) and MELD-scores, and in AC patients the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was measured by liver vein catheterisation. We used Kaplan-Meier statistics for short-term survival (84-days) in AH patients and long-term (4 years) in AC patients. We measured plasma sMR by ELISA. RESULTS: Median sMR concentrations were significantly elevated in AH 1.32(IQR:0.69) and AC 0.46(0.5) compared to HC 0.2(0.06) mg/L; p<0.001 and increased in a stepwise manner with the CP-score (p<0.001). In AC sMR predicted portal hypertension (HVPG ≥10 mmHg) with an area under the Receiver Operator Characteristics curve of 0.86 and a high sMR cut-off (>0.43 mg/l) was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The soluble mannose receptor is elevated in alcoholic liver disease, especially in patients with AH. Its blood level predicts portal hypertension and long-term mortality in AC patients.

Effects of lifestyle intervention on soluble CD163, a macrophage activation marker, in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: Liver macrophages play an important role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Soluble CD163 (sCD163), a macrophage-specific biomarker, reflects disease activity in the range of liver diseases. The impact of lifestyle intervention on sCD163 in adult NAFLD patients has not been investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We assessed 126 NAFLD patients participating in a lifestyle intervention study for sCD163 concentrations at baseline, after the three-month intervention period, and at long-term follow-up after 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: The median sCD163 concentration at baseline was 2.59 mg/L (IQR = 1.78-3.63 mg/L). There was a significant decrease in sCD163 from baseline to three months follow-up (-0.64 mg/L, p < .001) with no difference between the four study groups (p = .6). At 12 and 24 months follow-up, the sCD163 concentrations had returned to baseline level (p = .3 and p = .1). Baseline sCD163 correlated with liver biomarkers and metabolic variables. There was a significantly greater decrease in sCD163 in patients who had a decrease in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) compared with patients with unchanged or increased ALT (-0.76 mg/L vs. -0.41 mg/L, p = .02), and in patients with a decrease in HOMA-IR compared with individuals with no decrease (-0.86 mg/L vs. -0.55 mg/L, p = .03). CONCLUSION: sCD163 is associated with markers of liver necro-inflammation and glucose homoeostasis in NAFLD. Participation in a lifestyle intervention programme resulted in a significant reduction in sCD163. Our data support the utility of sCD163 as a biomarker for monitoring the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in NAFLD.

The soluble mannose receptor is released from the liver in cirrhotic patients, but is not associated with bacterial translocation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intestinal bacterial translocation is involved in activation of liver macrophages in cirrhotic patients. Macrophages play a key role in liver inflammation and are involved in the pathogenesis of cirrhosis and complications. Bacterial translocation may be determined by presence of bacterial DNA and macrophage activation, by the soluble mannose receptor. We hypothesize that the soluble mannose receptor is released from hepatic macrophages in cirrhosis and associated with bacterial DNA, portal pressure and complications. METHODS: We investigated 28 cirrhotic patients set for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion as a result of refractory ascites (n=17), acute (n=3), or recurrent variceal bleeding (n=8). We analysed plasma from the portal and hepatic veins for bacterial DNA and soluble mannose receptor with qPCR and ELISA. RESULTS: The median soluble mannose receptor level was elevated in the hepatic vein compared with the portal vein (0.57(interquartile range 0.31) vs 0.55(0.40) mg/L, P=.005). The soluble mannose receptor levels were similar in bacterial DNA-positive and -negative patients. The soluble mannose receptor level in the portal and hepatic veins correlated with the portal pressure prior to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion (r=.52, P<.008, both) and the levels correlated with Child-Pugh score (r=.63 and r=.56, P<.004, both). We observed higher soluble mannose receptor levels in patients with acute variceal bleeding compared to other indications (P<.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed hepatic soluble mannose receptor excretion with a higher level in the hepatic than the portal vein, though with no associations to bacterial DNA. We observed associations between soluble mannose receptor levels and portal pressure and higher levels in patients with acute variceal bleeding indicating the soluble mannose receptor as a marker of complications of cirrhosis, but not bacterial translocation.

Macrophage activation markers predict mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis without or with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Activation of liver macrophages plays a key role in liver and systemic inflammation and may be involved in development and prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). We therefore measured the circulating macrophage activation markers soluble sCD163 and mannose receptor (sMR) and related them to the short-(1-3 months) and long-term (6 months) mortality in the cirrhosis patients of the CANONIC study. METHODS: Eighty-six cirrhosis patients had no ascites and no ACLF, 580 had ascites but no ACLF; 100, 66, and 19 had ACLF-grade-I (ACLF-I), ACLF-II, and ACLF-III, respectively. The patients' clinical course was registered and their MELD, CLIF-C Acute Decompensation (AD), and CLIF-C ACLF-scores computed at inclusion. RESULTS: We found a stepwise increase (p<0.001) in median sCD163 (5.68 (IQR: 3.86-9.60); 8.26 (5.02-12.34); 9.50 (5.37-17.91); 15.68 (10.12-19.42); 20.18 (15.26-32.20) mg/L) and sMR (0.60 (0.40-0.84); 0.81 (0.57-1.12); 0.81 (0.61-1.26); 1.17 (0.89-1.62); 1.41 (1.14-1.79)mg/L) with increasing grades of ACLF. Both sCD163 and sMR were independently associated with short and long-term mortality and showed equal or higher predictive accuracy than MELD, CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C AD scores. Addition of the macrophage markers to the clinical scores improved the prognostic efficacy: In ACLF patients sCD163 improved prediction of short-term mortality (C-index: 0.74 (0.67-0.80)) and in patients without ACLF sMR improved prediction of long-term mortality (C-index: 0.80 (0.76-0.85)). CONCLUSIONS: The severity related increase in sCD163 and sMR and close association with mortality suggest a primary importance of inflammatory activation of liver macrophages in the emergence and course of ACLF. Accordingly, supplementation of the macrophage biomarkers to the platform of the clinical scores improved the prognostic performance beyond that of the original scores.

The novel biomarker of alternative macrophage activation, soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206): Implications in multiple myeloma.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play an important role in the pathophysiology of human malignancies. They support growth of cancer cells by promoting angiogenesis, and by inhibiting tumour cell apoptosis and anti-tumor immune reactions. Several membrane proteins are well-described markers of human TAMs, including the haemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 and the macrophage mannose receptor (MR/CD206). Interestingly, both CD163 and MR exist as soluble serum proteins (sCD163 and sMR) that may reflect the activation state of tissue macrophages, including TAMs. Here, we report the first data on sMR as a biomarker in patients with a malignant disease. We have measured concentrations of sMR in peripheral blood serum (n=104) from patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and examined associations with data from medical records. At diagnosis, sMR levels were elevated in 27% of patients, and decreased after treatment. Further, sMR levels were associated with prognostic markers in MM, and elevated sMR (>0.43mg/L) was an independent marker of overall survival in a multivariate analysis (HR=2.20, P=0.006). Levels of sMR in blood samples showed significant association with sCD163, which may indicate common origin from CD163+MR+TAMs.

Increased concentrations of the soluble mannose receptor in serum from patients with pneumococcal bacteraemia, and prediction of survival.

BACKGROUND: The soluble mannose receptor (sMR) is a new serum marker of macrophage activation. The aim of the present study was to investigate sMR as a prognostic marker in patients with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), and compare it to other inflammatory biomarkers. METHODS: Samples from 128 patients with IPD were collected at the time of first positive blood culture and analysed using an in-house sMR assay. Clinical data were retrieved from patient files. The main outcome investigated was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The median sMR concentration in the entire group of patients was 0.77 mg/L. There was a significant difference in sMR concentration between patients below (n = 92, sMR = 0.82 mg/L) or above (n = 36, sMR = 0.73 mg/L) the age of 75 (p < 0.001). In the entire group there was a significant difference in sMR concentrations between survivors (n = 107, sMR = 0.72 mg/L) and non-survivors (n = 21, sMR = 1.38 mg/L), but for patients 75 years or older this difference was not statistically significant. For prediction of survival sMR seemed most promising (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.79) compared with sCD163 (AUC = 0.70) and CRP (AUC = 0.73). In patients 75 years or older the AUC was lower for all three markers (sMR = 0.56, sCD163 = 0.38, CRP = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study designate sMR as a potential new biomarker in infectious disease. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of research into macrophage malfunction in elderly patients.

Monocyte expression and soluble levels of the haemoglobin receptor (CD163/sCD163) and the mannose receptor (MR/sMR) in septic and critically ill non-septic ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of sepsis is challenging and there is an unmet need for sensitive and specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Following activation of macrophages and monocytes, the haptoglobin-haemoglobin receptor (CD163) and the mannose receptor (MR) are shed into the circulation (sCD163 and sMR). OBJECTIVE: We investigated monocyte expression of CD163 and MR, and levels of sCD163 and sMR in septic and non-septic patients, and in healthy controls. We hypothesised that these receptors are elevated during sepsis and can be used diagnostic and prognostic. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and 15 critically ill non-septic patients were included in this prospective observational study at three ICUs at Aarhus University Hospital and Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark. Fifteen age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers served as controls. Levels of sCD163 and sMR were measured using a sandwich ELISA and monocyte expression of CD163 and MR was evaluated by flow cytometry during the first four days of ICU stay. The diagnostic and prognostic values of the receptors were assessed using AUROC curves. RESULTS: At ICU admission and during the observation period, monocyte expression of CD163 and levels of sCD163 and sMR were significantly higher in septic patients compared with non-septic patients and healthy controls (p<0.01 for all comparisons). Monocytes did not express MR. The diagnostic values estimated by AUROC were 1.00 for sMR, 0.95 for sCD163, 0.87 for CRP, and 0.75 for monocyte-bound CD163. Among the septic patients, monocyte expression of CD163 was higher in non-survivors compared with survivors at ICU admission (p = 0.02) and during the observation period (p = 0.006). The prognostic value of monocyte-bound CD163 estimated by AUROC at ICU admission was 0.82. CONCLUSION: The macrophage-specific markers CD163, sCD163, and sMR are increased in septic patients. Particularly sMR is a promising new biomarker of sepsis.

A soluble form of the macrophage-related mannose receptor (MR/CD206) is present in human serum and elevated in critical illness.

BACKGROUND: This study tests the hypothesis that the mannose receptor (MR/CD206), which is expressed primarily by macrophages and dendritic cells, can be found in a soluble form (sMR, sMR) in human serum. Furthermore, we wished to establish and validate an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for sMR and to perform initial studies exploring the potential of sMR as a biomarker. METHODS: Western blotting identified a single band of approximately 170 kDa in human serum, and MALDI MS/MS of the purified protein confirmed it to be sMR. An ELISA was established and validated with a measurement range of 1-256 µg/L. RESULTS: The 95% reference interval was 0.10-0.43 mg/L based on measurements of serum samples from healthy individuals (n=217). Samples from hospitalised patients (n=219) revealed that more than 50% of patients had concentrations above 0.43 mg/L. Very high concentrations (up to 6.2 mg/L) were observed in critically ill patients with sepsis and/or severe liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents, for the first time, the presence of sMR in human serum and describes an optimised ELISA suitable for quantitative measurements. Levels of sMR are strongly elevated in several disease states, including sepsis and liver disease, and the protein therefore shows promise as a new biomarker.