RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cancer treatmentinduced arrhythmia (CTIA) is a well-recognized form of cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been associated with important forms of cardiotoxicity, including myocarditis. However, the incidence of CTIA associated with ICI has not been well characterized. METHODS: We reviewed all patients treated with ICIs at our institution from Jan. 2010 to Oct. 2015. CTIA was defined as a new diagnosis of clinically relevant arrhythmia within 6 months after ICI initiation. RESULTS: During the study period, 268 patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, of whom 190 received monotherapy with ipilimumab (n=114), nivolumab (n=52) or pembrolizumab (n=24) and 78 received combination therapy: ipilimumab & nivolumab (n=37), ipilimumab & pembrolizumab (n=39) and nivolumab & pembrolizumab (n=2). Four patients (1.5%) developed CTIA. Of these, 3 patients developed a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), one of whom required cardioversion. In 2 cases of new-onset AF, significant provoking factors were present in addition to ICI therapy including thyrotoxicosis in one and metabolic disarray in another. Six patients (2.2%) with a pre-existing diagnosis of paroxysmal AF experienced episodes within 6 months of initiating ICI therapy. None of the arrhythmic events were associated with known or suspected myocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of arrhythmic complications associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors appears to be very low (~1.5%). Patients with a pre-existing diagnosis of AF may be at-risk of recurrence during ICI treatment and should be monitored accordingly. These suggest that from an arrhythmia perspective, ICIs appear to be very safe and well-tolerated.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Head-to-head comparative data for the postoperative care of patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate complication and readmission rates between patients undergoing same-day (SD) or next-day (ND) discharges for ablative procedures in the left atrium, primarily atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Two electrophysiology centers simultaneously perform left atrial ablations with differing discharge strategies. We identified all patients who underwent left atrial ablation from August 2017 to August 2019 (n = 409) undergoing either SD (n = 210) or ND (n = 199) discharge protocols. We analyzed any clinical events that resulted in procedural abortion, extended hospitalization, or readmission within 72 hours. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of complication and readmission rate was similar between SD and ND discharge (14.3% vs 12.6%, p = 0.665). Rates of complications categorized as major (2.4% vs 3.0%, p = 0. 776) and minor (11.9% vs 9.5%, p = 0.524) were also similar.Multivariable regression modeling revealed no significant correlation between discharge strategy and complication/readmission occurrence (OR 1.565 [0.754 - 3.248], p = 0.23), but a positive association of hypertension and procedure duration (OR 3.428 [1.436 - 8.184], p = 0.006) and (OR 1.01 [1 - 1.019], p = 0.046) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial ablation complication and readmission rates were similar between SD and ND discharge practices. Hypertension and procedural duration were associated with increased complication rates irrespective of discharge strategy. These data, which represent the first side-by-side comparison of discharge strategy, suggests same-day discharge is safe and feasible for left atrial ablation procedures.
