Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients without correction of bony risk factors leads to acceptable outcomes but higher failure rates.

OBJECTIVES: To report outcomes and re-dislocation rates of medial patellar stabilizers reconstruction without bone procedures for correction of anatomical risk factors for patellar instability in skeletally immature patients; to compare isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction to combined MPFL and medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) reconstruction in this population. METHODS: Patients with open physis and bone abnormalities including patella alta and/or increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and/or trochlear dysplasia underwent MPFL reconstruction, either isolated or associated with MPTL reconstruction. Preoperative, 1-year follow-up and the latest follow-up (5 years minimum) data were collected. Radiological and clinical evaluations were conducted, with special attention to failure rate. Comparison of results from isolated MPFL and combined MPFL/MPTL reconstructions was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included, 19 in the isolated MPFL group (median 14 years old; follow-up 5.8 â€‹± â€‹1.7 years) and 10 in the combined MPFL/MPTL group (median 13.5 years old; follow-up 5.2 â€‹± â€‹1.4 years). Kujala and Tegner scores increased over time, although without statistically significant differences between the two groups at the latest follow-up (p â€‹= â€‹0.840 and p â€‹> â€‹0.999, respectively). During follow-up, 5 of 19 (26.3%) isolated MPFL and 2 of 10 (20%) MPFL/MPTL reconstructions experienced recurrence of patellar dislocation (p â€‹> â€‹0.999). Trochlear dysplasia type D (p â€‹= â€‹0.028), knee rotation (p â€‹= â€‹0.009) and lateral patellar tilt angle (p â€‹= â€‹0.003) were associated with patellar instability recurrence. The isolated MPFL group showed increased laxity on physical exam at the latest follow-up compared to the 1-year follow-up (patellar glide test (p â€‹= â€‹0.002), patellar tilt test (p â€‹= â€‹0.042) and subluxation in extension (p â€‹= â€‹0.019). This increased laxity was not observed in the MPFL/MPTL group (p â€‹> â€‹0.999). Comparing both groups, the glide test was significantly better in the combined MPFL/MPTL group in comparison to the isolated MPFL reconstruction group at the latest follow-up (p â€‹= â€‹0.021). CONCLUSION: MPFL reconstruction in isolation or combined with MPTL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with additional uncorrected anatomical patellofemoral abnormalities leads to acceptable clinical outcomes within a minimum of 5 years follow-up, although has a high failure rate of 24.1%. Addition of a MPTL reconstruction to the MPFL may result in decreased patellar laxity on physical exams, as demonstrated by better patellar glide test, patellar tilt test and subluxation in extension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective cohort study.

Lever sign test for chronic acl injury: a comparison with lachman and anterior drawer tests / Teste da alavanca para lesão crônica do lca: comparação com os testes de lachman e gaveta anterior

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. Methods: 72 consecutive patients with a history of previous knee sprains were included. The Lachman, anterior drawer, and Lever Sign tests were performed for all subjects in a randomized order by three blinded raters with different levels of experience. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and inter-rater agreement were estimated for all tests. Results: Among the 72 patients, the prevalence of ACL injuries was 54%. The lever test showed sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI 0.47-0.78) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 0.87-1.00) for the senior examiner. For the less experienced examiner the sensitivity was 51.8% and the specificity was 93.7%. Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% and 70.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Lever Sign test shows to be a maneuver of easy execution, with 100% specificity and 100% PPV. Moderate agreement between experienced examiners and low agreement among experienced and inexperienced examiners was found. This test may play a role as an auxiliary maneuver. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.

RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a sensibilidade e a especificidade do teste da alavanca em pacientes ambulatoriais com e sem lesões crônicas do LCA e a concordância entre examinadores com diferentes níveis de experiência. Métodos: Setenta e dois pacientes consecutivos com histórico de entorse de joelho foram incluídos. O teste de lachman, gaveta anterior e teste de alavanca foram realizados para todos os indivíduos em ordem randomizada por 3 examinadores cegados com diferentes níveis de experiência. Sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo, valor preditivo negativo e concordância interavaliadores foram calculados para todos os testes. Resultados: Entre os 72 pacientes, a prevalência de lesões do LCA foi de 54%. O teste da alavanca mostrou sensibilidade de 64,1% (IC95% 0,47-0,78) e especificidade de 100% (IC95% 0,87-1,00) para o examinador sênior. Para o examinador menos experiente, a sensibilidade foi de 51,8% e a especificidade, de 93,7%. Valores preditivos positivos (VPP) e valores preditivos negativos (VPN) foram de 100% e 70,2%, respectivamente. Conclusão: O teste da alavanca mostra ser uma manobra de fácil execução, com 100% de especificidade e 100% de PPV. Foi encontrada concordância moderada entre examinadores experientes e baixa concordância entre examinadores experientes e inexperientes. Este teste pode desempenhar um papel como uma manobra adjuvante. Nível de Evidência I, Estudos Diagnósticos - Investigação de um Exame para Diagnóstico.

LEVER SIGN TEST FOR CHRONIC ACL INJURY: A COMPARISON WITH LACHMAN AND ANTERIOR DRAWER TESTS.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in patients with and without chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries in an outpatient setting and the inter-examiner agreement of surgeons with different levels of experience. METHODS: 72 consecutive patients with a history of previous knee sprains were included. The Lachman, anterior drawer, and Lever Sign tests were performed for all subjects in a randomized order by three blinded raters with different levels of experience. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and inter-rater agreement were estimated for all tests. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, the prevalence of ACL injuries was 54%. The lever test showed sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI 0.47-0.78) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 0.87-1.00) for the senior examiner. For the less experienced examiner the sensitivity was 51.8% and the specificity was 93.7%. Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% and 70.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lever Sign test shows to be a maneuver of easy execution, with 100% specificity and 100% PPV. Moderate agreement between experienced examiners and low agreement among experienced and inexperienced examiners was found. This test may play a role as an auxiliary maneuver. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.

OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a sensibilidade e a especificidade do teste da alavanca em pacientes ambulatoriais com e sem lesões crônicas do LCA e a concordância entre examinadores com diferentes níveis de experiência. MÉTODOS: Setenta e dois pacientes consecutivos com histórico de entorse de joelho foram incluídos. O teste de lachman, gaveta anterior e teste de alavanca foram realizados para todos os indivíduos em ordem randomizada por 3 examinadores cegados com diferentes níveis de experiência. Sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo, valor preditivo negativo e concordância interavaliadores foram calculados para todos os testes. RESULTADOS: Entre os 72 pacientes, a prevalência de lesões do LCA foi de 54%. O teste da alavanca mostrou sensibilidade de 64,1% (IC95% 0,47-0,78) e especificidade de 100% (IC95% 0,87-1,00) para o examinador sênior. Para o examinador menos experiente, a sensibilidade foi de 51,8% e a especificidade, de 93,7%. Valores preditivos positivos (VPP) e valores preditivos negativos (VPN) foram de 100% e 70,2%, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: O teste da alavanca mostra ser uma manobra de fácil execução, com 100% de especificidade e 100% de PPV. Foi encontrada concordância moderada entre examinadores experientes e baixa concordância entre examinadores experientes e inexperientes. Este teste pode desempenhar um papel como uma manobra adjuvante. Nível de Evidência I, Estudos Diagnósticos - Investigação de um Exame para Diagnóstico.