Catalysing global surgery: a meta-research study on factors affecting surgical research collaborations with Africa.

INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the urgent need for rapid collaboration, research, and interventions. International research collaborations foster more significant responses to rapid global changes by enabling international, multicentre research, decreasing biases, and increasing study validity while reducing overall research time and costs. However, there has been low uptake of collaborative research by African institutions and individuals. AIM: To systematically review facilitating factors and challenges to collaborative surgical research studies conducted in Africa. METHODOLOGY: A meta-research review using PubMed®/MEDLINE and Embase on surgical collaboration in Africa from 1st of January 2011 to 31st of September 2021 in accordance to PRISMA guidelines. Surgical studies by collaborative groups involving African authors and sites were included (55 papers). Data on the study period, geographical regions, and research scope, facilitating factors, and challenges were extracted from the studies retrieved from the search. RESULTS: Most of the collaborations in Africa occurred with European institutions (76%). Of the 54 African countries, 63% (34/54) participated in surgical collaborations. The highest collaboration frequency occurred in South Africa (11%) and Nigeria (8%). However, most publications originated from Eastern Africa (43%). Leveraging synergies between high- and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), well-defined structures, and secure data platforms facilitated collaboration. However, the underrepresentation of collaborators from LMICs was a significant challenge. CONCLUSION: Available literature provides critical insights into the facilitating factors and challenges of research collaboration with Africa. However, there is a need for a detailed prospective study to explore the themes highlighted further. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022352115 .

Effects of transfusing older red blood cells and platelets on obstetric patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between transfusion of blood products close to the end of shelf-life and clinical outcomes in obstetric inpatients. METHODS: Mortality and morbidity were compared in patients transfused exclusively with red blood cells (RBC) stored for less than 21 days (fresh) versus RBC stored for 35 days or longer (old), and platelets (PLT) stored for 3 days or fewer (fresh) versus 4 days or longer (old) in Queensland, Australia from 2007 to 2013. Multivariable models were used to examine associations between these groups of blood products and clinical end points. RESULTS: There were 3371 patients who received RBC and 280 patients who received PLT of the eligible storage durations. Patients transfused with old RBC received fewer transfusions (2.7 ± 1.8 vs. 2.3 ± 1.0 units; P < 0.001). However, a higher rate of single-unit transfusions was also seen in those patients who exclusively received old RBC (252 [9.3%] vs. 92 [13.7%]; P = 0.003). Comparison of fresh vs. old blood products revealed no differences in the quantities of transfused RBC (9.5 ± 5.9 vs. 9.1 ± 5.2 units; P = 0.680) or PLT (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.1 units; P = 0.301) as well as the length of hospital stay for RBC (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-5] days; P = 0.124) or PLT (5 [4-8] vs. 6 [4-9] days; P = 0.120). CONCLUSION: Transfusing exclusively older RBC or PLT was not associated with increased morbidity or mortality.

Resuscitation-associated endotheliopathy (RAsE): a conceptual framework based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Shock-induced endotheliopathy (SHINE), defined as a profound sympathoadrenal hyperactivation in shock states leading to endothelial activation, glycocalyx damage, and eventual compromise of end-organ perfusion, was first described in 2017. The aggressive resuscitation therapies utilised in treating shock states could potentially lead to further worsening endothelial activation and end-organ dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the literature on resuscitation-associated and resuscitation-induced endotheliopathy. METHODS: A predetermined structured search of literature published over an 11-year and 6-month period (1 January 2011 to 31 July 2023) was performed in two indexed databases (PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase) per PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion was restricted to original studies published in English (or with English translation) reporting on endothelial dysfunction in critically ill human subjects undergoing resuscitation interventions. Reviews or studies conducted in animals were excluded. Qualitative synthesis of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was performed. Studies reporting comparable biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction post-resuscitation were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Most of these studies (47%) reported on a combination of mediators released from endothelial cells and biomarkers of glycocalyx breakdown, while only 22% reported on microvascular flow changes. Only ten individual studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis based on the comparability of the parameters assessed. Eight studies measured syndecan-1, with a heterogeneity index, I2 = 75.85% (pooled effect size, mean = 0.27; 95% CI - 0.07 to 0.60; p = 0.12). Thrombomodulin was measured in four comparable studies (I2 = 78.93%; mean = 0.41; 95% CI - 0.10 to 0.92; p = 0.12). Three studies measured E-selectin (I2 = 50.29%; mean = - 0.15; 95% CI - 0.64 to 0.33; p = 0.53), and only two were comparable for the microvascular flow index, MFI (I2 = 0%; mean = - 0.80; 95% CI - 1.35 to - 0.26; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Resuscitation-associated endotheliopathy (RAsE) refers to worsening endothelial dysfunction resulting from acute resuscitative therapies administered in shock states. In the included studies, syndecan-1 had the highest frequency of assessment in the post-resuscitation period, and changes in concentrations showed a statistically significant effect of the resuscitation. There are inadequate data available in this area, and further research and standardisation of the ideal assessment and panel of biomarkers are urgently needed.