Endocrine-disrupting chemical concentrations in follicular fluid and follicular reproductive hormone levels.

PURPOSE: To determine correlations between chemicals in follicular fluid (FF) and follicular reproductive hormone levels. METHODS: The analysis was part of a larger cohort study to determine associations between exposure to EDCs and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. FF was aspirated from a single leading follicle per participant. Demographics and data on exposure to EDCs were self-reported by the participants using a questionnaire. The concentrations of estradiol (E2), progesterone (PG), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), and inhibin B, as well as that of 12 phthalate metabolites and 12 phenolic chemicals were measured in each FF sample. Multivariate linear regression model was used to identify the drivers of hormone levels based on participant's age, BMI, smoking status, and chemical exposure for the monitored chemicals detected in more than 50% of the samples. Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction was applied on the resulting p values (q value). RESULTS: FF samples were obtained from 72 women (mean age 30.9 years). Most of the phthalates and phenolic substances monitored (21/24, 88%) were identified in FF. Ten compounds (7 phthalate metabolites, 3 phenols) were found in more than 50% of samples. In addition, there were positive associations between E2 levels and mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP) (beta = 0.01) and mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) (beta = 0.03) levels (q value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher concentrations of several phthalate metabolites, present among others in personal care products, were associated with increased E2 levels in FF. The results emphasize the need to further investigate the mechanisms of action of such EDCs on hormonal cyclicity and fertility in women.

A risk factor profile for placenta accreta spectrum in pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology.

Objective: To identify independent risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum among pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Patients: Individuals who conceived with assisted reproductive technology and reached 20 weeks' gestation or later from 2011 to 2017. Interventions: Patient and cycle data was abstracted from hospital records and supplemented with state-level data. Poisson regression was used for multivariate analyses and reported as adjusted relative risks (aRR). Main Outcome Measures: Clinical or histologic placenta accreta spectrum. Results: Of 1,975 qualifying pregnancies, 44 (2.3%) met criteria for accreta spectrum at delivery. In the multivariate model, significant risk factors included low-lying placenta at delivery (aRR, 15.44; 95% CI 7.76-30.72), uterine factor infertility or prior uterine surgery (aRR, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.72-8.05), initial low-lying placentation that resolved (aRR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.90-7.73), and use of frozen embryos (aRR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.66-5.48). When the fresh vs frozen variable was replaced with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, the final model did not change (aRR, 2.40 for unstimulated cycles, 95% CI, 1.32-4.38). With frozen transfers, the accreta rate was 16% when the endometrial thickness was < 6mm vs 3.8% with thicker endometrium (P=.02). Conclusions: Among pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology, accreta spectrum is associated with low placental implantation (even when resolved), uterine factor infertility and prior uterine surgery, and the use of frozen embryo transfer or unstimulated cycles.

Infertility services integrated within the maternal health department of a public hospital in a low-income country, Rwanda.

Objective: To describe the initiation, integration, and costs of reduced-cost infertility services within the maternal health department of a public hospital in a low-income country. Design: Retrospective review of the clinical and laboratory components of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in Rwanda from 2018 to 2020. Setting: Academic tertiary referral hospital in Rwanda. Patients: Patients seeking infertility services beyond the primary gynecological options. Interventions: The national government furnished facilities and personnel, and the Rwanda Infertility Initiative, an international nongovernmental organization, provided training, equipment, and materials. The incidence of retrieval, fertilization, embryo cleavage, transfer, and conception (observed until ultrasound verification of intrauterine pregnancy with fetal heartbeat) were analyzed. Cost calculations used the government-issued tariff specifying insurers' payments and patients' copayments with projected delivery rates using early literature. Main Outcome Measures: Assessment of functional clinical and laboratory infertility services and costs. Results: A total of 207 IVF cycles were initiated, 60 of which led to transfer of ≥1 high-grade embryo and 5 to ongoing pregnancies. The projected average cost per cycle was 1,521 USD. Using optimistic and conservative assumptions, the estimated costs per delivery for women <35 years were 4,540 and 5,156 USD, respectively. Conclusions: Reduced-cost infertility services were initiated and integrated within a maternal health department of a public hospital in a low-income country. This integration required commitment, collaboration, leadership, and a universal health financing system. Low-income countries, such as Rwanda, might consider infertility treatment and IVF for younger patients as part of an equitable and affordable health care benefit.

The importance of on-site genetic counseling for prospective assisted reproductive technology patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of having an onsite genetic counseling service integrated into an assisted reproductive technology (ART) center. METHODS: Since January 2021, we have offered genetic counseling at our ART center for couples whose medical history suggests risk of transmission of a genetic disorder. The percentage of couples referred for genetic counseling, the distribution of couples according to reasons for consultation, the mode of transmission in cases of Mendelian disorders, and the frequency of mutations for those with identified genetic disorders were determined. RESULTS: In an 18-month period, 150 of 1340 couples (11.2%) enrolled for ART treatment were referred to the genetic counseling unit. Two-thirds (99/150, 66.0%) were referred for a known genetic risk, a family history of a genetic disorder or chromosomal abnormality, a serious condition of unknown cause, or consanguinity. The remaining couples had a putative genetic risk (diminished ovarian reserve, high incidence of oocyte immaturity, recurrent abortion, or severe male infertility). Of the 99 with known genetic risk, 62 (62.7%), were approved for ART treatment, 23 (23.2%) were recommended prenatal or preimplantation testing, and 14 (14.1%) were referred for further testing before undergoing ART. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal great value in having an on-site genetic counseling unit for referral of ART patients. Such a unit makes the ART process smoother and safer for couples, and it lightens the burden of ART staff by removing responsibilities for which they are neither trained, nor should they have to assume.

Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future.

Women suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) had no hope of childbearing until clinical feasibility of uterus transplantation (UTx) was documented in 2014 with the birth of a healthy baby. This landmark accomplishment followed extensive foundational work with a wide range of animal species including higher primates. In the present review, we provide a summary of the animal research and describe the results of cases and clinical trials on UTx. Surgical advances for graft removal from live donors and transplantation to recipients are improving, with a recent trend away from laparotomy to robotic approaches, although challenges persist regarding optimum immunosuppressive therapies and tests for graft rejection. Because UTx does not involve transplantation of the Fallopian tubes, IVF is required as part of the UTx process. We provide a unique focus on the intersection between these two processes, with consideration of when oocyte retrieval should be performed, whether, and for whom, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be used, whether oocytes or embryos should be frozen and when the first embryo transfer should be performed post-UTx. We also address the utility of an international society UTx (ISUTx) registry for assessing overall UTx success rates, complications, and live births. The long-term health outcomes of all parties involved-the uterus donor (if live donor), the recipient, her partner and any children born from the transplanted graft-are also reviewed. Unlike traditional solid organ transplantation procedures, UTx is not lifesaving, but is life-giving, although as with traditional types of transplantation, costs, and ethical considerations are inevitable. We discuss the likelihood that costs will decrease as efficiency and efficacy improve, and that ethical complexities for and against acceptability of the procedure sharpen the distinctions between genetic, gestational, and social parenthood. As more programs wish to offer the procedure, we suggest a scheme for setting up a UTx program as well as future directions of this rapidly evolving field. In our 2010 review, we described the future of clinical UTx based on development of the procedure in animal models. This Grand Theme Review offers a closing loop to this previous review of more than a decade ago. The clinical feasibility of UTx has now been proved. Advancements include widening the criteria for acceptance of donors and recipients, improving surgery, shortening time to pregnancy, and improving post-UTx management. Together, these improvements catalyze the transition of UTx from experimental into mainstream clinical practice. The procedure will then represent a realistic and accessible alternative to gestational surrogacy for the treatment of AUFI and should become part of the armamentarium of reproductive specialists worldwide.

Cumulus cell co-culture in media drops does not improve rescue in vitro maturation of vitrified-warmed immature oocytes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether co-culture with vitrified-warmed cumulus cells (CCs) in media drops improves rescue in vitro maturation (IVM) of previously vitrified immature oocytes. Previous studies have shown improved rescue IVM of fresh immature oocytes when cocultured with CCs in a three-dimensional matrix. However, the scheduling and workload of embryologists would benefit from a simpler IVM approach, particularly in the setting of time-sensitive oncofertility oocyte cryopreservation (OC) cases. Although the yield of developmentally competent mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes is increased when rescue IVM is performed before cryopreservation, it is unknown whether maturation of previously vitrified immature oocytes is improved after coculture with CCs in a simple system not involving a three-dimensional matrix. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 320 (160 germinal vesicles [GVs] and 160 metaphase I [MI]) immature oocytes and autologous CC clumps were vitrified from patients who were undergoing planned OC or intracytoplasmic sperm injection from July 2020 until September 2021. INTERVENTIONS: On warming, the oocytes were randomized to culture in IVM media with CCs (+CC) or without CCs (-CC). Germinal vesicles and MI oocytes were cultured in 25 µL (SAGE IVM medium) for 32 hours and 20-22 hours, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oocytes with a polar body (MII) were randomized to confocal microscopy for analysis of spindle integrity and chromosomal alignment to assess nuclear maturity or to parthenogenetic activation to assess cytoplasmic maturity. Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and the chi square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables assessed statistical significance. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Patient demographic characteristics were similar for both the GV and MI groups after randomization to +CC vs. -CC. No statistically significant differences were observed between +CC vs. -CC groups regarding the percentage of MII from either GV (42.5% [34/80] vs. 52.5% [42/80]; RR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.57-1.15]) or MI (76.3% [61/80]; vs. 72.5% [58/80]; RR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.88-1.26]) oocytes. An increased percentage of GV-matured MIIs underwent parthenogenetic activation in the +CC group (92.3% [12/13] vs. 70.8% [17/24]), but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.30; 95% CI: 0.97-1.75), whereas the activation rate was identical for MI-matured oocytes (74.3% [26/35] vs. 75.0% [18/24], CC+ vs. CC-; RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.74-1.32). No significant differences were observed between +CC vs. -CC groups for cleavage of parthenotes from GV-matured oocytes (91.7% [11/12] vs. 82.4% [14/17]) or blastulation (0 for both) or for MI-matured oocytes (cleavage: 80.8% [21/26] vs. 94.4% [17/18]; blastulation: 0 [0/26] vs. 16.7% [3/18]). Further, no significant differences were observed between +CC vs. -CC for GV-matured oocytes regarding incidence of bipolar spindles (38.9% [7/18] vs. 33.3% [5/15]) or aligned chromosomes (22.2% [4/18] vs. 0.0 [0/15]); or for MI-matured oocytes (bipolar spindle: 38.9% [7/18] vs. 42.9% [2/28]); aligned chromosomes (35.3% [6/17] vs. 24.1% [7/29]). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulus cell co-culture in this simple two-dimensional system does not improve rescue IVM of vitrified, warmed immature oocytes, at least by the markers assessed here. Further work is required to assess the efficacy of this system given its potential to provide flexibility in a busy, in vitro fertilization clinic.

Recurrent implantation failure: reality or a statistical mirage?: Consensus statement from the July 1, 2022 Lugano Workshop on recurrent implantation failure.

IMPORTANCE: To date, recurrent implantation failure (RIF) has no clear definition and no clearly identified impaired function. Hence, the term RIF is currently used somewhat haphazardly, on the basis of clinicians' judgment. OBJECTIVE: International experts in reproductive medicine met on July 1, 2022, in Lugano, Switzerland, to review the different facets of RIF and define the diagnosis and its appropriate management. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review without meta-analysis of studies published in English from January 2015 to May 2022. FINDINGS: Data indicated that RIF has been largely overevaluated, overdiagnosed, and overtreated without sufficient critical assessment of its true nature. Our analyses show that true RIF is extremely uncommon-occurring in <5% of couples with infertility-and that reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases of assisted reproductive technology (ART) failure. Although the true biologic determinants of RIF may exist in a small subset of people with infertility, they elude the currently available tools for assessment. Without identification of the true underlying etiology(ies), it is reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid blastocyst transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryo transfers, adjusted to the patient's age and corresponding euploidy rate). In addition, other factors should be ruled out that may contribute to her reduced odds of sustained implantation. In such cases, implantation failure should not be the only issue considered in case of ART failure because this may result from multiple other factors that are not necessarily repetitive or persistent. In reality, RIF impacting the probability of further ART success is a very rare occurrence. CONCLUSION: True RIF is extremely uncommon, occurring in <5% of couples with infertility. Reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases. It would seem reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid embryo transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryos, adjusted to her age). RELEVANCE: Given the number of internationally recognized experts in the field present at the Lugano meeting 2022, our publication constitutes a consensus statement.

Monkeypox Virus Infection in 18-Year-Old Woman after Sexual Intercourse, France, September 2022.

A monkeypox virus outbreak has spread worldwide since April 2022. We report a young woman in France positive for monkeypox virus transmitted through oral and vaginal sex. Ulceronecrotic lesions developed intravaginally and around her vulva. Health professionals should become familiar with all aspects of infection from this virus, including possible vertical transmission.

Transgender Males as Potential Donors for Uterus Transplantation: A Survey.

Uterus transplantation is a new treatment for patients with absolute uterine infertility that is conducted in order to enable them to carry their own pregnancy. One of the limitations for its development is donor availability. Some transgender males undergo a hysterectomy in the gender-affirming surgery process, and might be interested in donating their uterus for transplantation. In this manuscript, we report the results of a survey designed to determine the attitudes of such individuals regarding donation of their uterus for this purpose. Over 32 years (January 1989-January 2021), 348 biological women underwent hysterectomy at our hospital as part of gender-affirming surgery. The survey was sent to 212 of the 348 prospective participants (for 136, we lacked postal or email addresses). Among the 212 surveys sent, we obtained responses from 94 individuals (44%): 83 (88.3%) stated they would agree to donate, of whom 44 would do so for altruism, 23 for the usefulness of the gesture and 16 out of understanding of the desire to have a child; 63 (75.5%) wanted to know the recipient and 45 (54.2%) wanted to know the result of the donation. According to this survey, a high proportion of transgender males surveyed would be interested in donating their uterus for uterus transplantation.

Day of trophectoderm biopsy and embryo quality are associated with outcomes following euploid embryo transfer.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes following transfer of euploid blastocysts of varying quality biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study to evaluate embryo transfer outcomes for women undergoing autologous cryopreserved next generation sequencing euploid single embryo transfer from 10/2015 to 2/2022 at an academic IVF program. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), implantation rate (IR), and miscarriage rate (SAB rate). RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-five transfers from 418 patients were analyzed. Euploid embryos biopsied on day 5 resulted in higher LBR compared to those biopsied on day 6 (62.3% vs. 49.6%; aRR 0.81 95% CI 0.65-0.996). When stratified by biopsy day and blastocyst quality, there was no difference in IR, OPR, and SAB rate for good, fair, and poor quality blastocysts biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. However, day 5 good quality embryos were associated with a higher LBR compared to day 6 good quality embryos (74.3% vs. 51.3%; aRR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.999). There were no significant differences in LBR for fair and poor quality embryos biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. CONCLUSION: Overall LBR are higher for euploid embryos biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. When stratified by embryo quality and day of biopsy, LBR are significantly higher for good quality day 5 versus day 6 embryos. When choosing between multiple euploid embryos, day 5 biopsied good quality embryos should be preferentially selected for transfer over day 6 embryos of the same quality.

A unique placenta previa risk factor profile for pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology.

OBJECTIVE: To define specific risk factors for placenta previa in pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Fertility centers and inpatient obstetric units in Massachusetts. PATIENT(S): Patients conceiving with ART and delivering at 20 weeks gestation or later between 2011 and 2017 in Massachusetts. INTERVENTION(S): Patient demographic and medical factors and specific components of their cycles. Data were obtained by linking vital records of the State of Massachusetts to reproductive clinic data obtained from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, and then supplementing this information with laboratory and obstetric data from 2 large academic hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Associations were tested between multiple cycle- and patient-related factors and placenta previa or low-lying placenta at delivery. After testing for confounders, multivariate models were adjusted for maternal age, history of prior cesarean delivery and birth plurality, and are reported as adjusted relative risks (aRR). RESULT(S): We included 18,939 pregnancies, with 553 (2.9%) having placenta previa at delivery. Advanced maternal age (aRR, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.48), endometriosis, (aRR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.71-2.86), and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (aRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.59) were associated with placenta previa, whereas multiple births (aRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.81) and a history of polycystic ovary syndrome or ovulation disorders (aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75) had negative associations. The endometriosis association was strong in nulliparas and the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation association was strong in parous patients in a stratified analysis. No association was seen with prior history of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION(S): Patients conceiving with ART do not have the typical previa risk factors of prior cesarean delivery and multiple gestations, whereas endometriosis and fresh embryo transfers contributed moderate risk. The embryo transfer process itself may affect previa development in this population.

Evolving clinical challenges in uterus transplantation.

Before the first live birth following uterus transplantation (UTx) in 2014, the 1-2% of women with an absent or non-functional uterus had no hope of childbearing. With 64 cases of UTx and 34 births reported in the scientific literature, this emerging technology has the potential for translation into mainstream clinical practice. However, limitations currently include donor availability, recipient suitability, surgical challenges regarding success and complications, and recipient management after UTx and during pregnancy. This review considers these challenges and ways to overcome them so that UTx could become part of the reproductive specialist's armamentarium when counselling patients with uterine factor infertility.

Pregnancies and Gynecological Follow-Up after Solid Organ Transplantation: Experience of a Decade.

In recent years, solid organ transplantations, such as kidney or lung grafts, have been performed worldwide with an improvement of quality of life under immunosuppressive therapy and an increase in life expectancy, allowing young women to consider childbearing. In the current study, we conduct a retrospective study in two French centers for kidney and lung transplantations to evaluate the rate and outcomes of pregnancies, contraception and gynecological monitoring for women under 40 years old who underwent solid organ transplantation. Among 210 women, progestin was the most widely used contraceptive method. Of the 210 women, 24 (11.4%) conceived 33 pregnancies of which 25 (75.8%) were planned with an immunosuppressant therapy switch. Of the 33 pregnancies, 7 miscarried (21.2%) and 21 (63.7%) resulted in a live birth with a high rate of pre-eclampsia (50%). No graft rejections were observed during pregnancies. Among the deliveries, 19 were premature (90.5%, mostly due to induced delivery) and the C-section rate was high (52.4%). No particular pathology was identified among newborns. We conclude that pregnancies following solid organ transplantation are feasible, and while they are at an increased risk of pre-eclampsia and prematurity, they should still be permitted with close surveillance by a multidisciplinary care team.

Impact of COVID-19 on Subclinical Placental Thrombosis and Maternal Thrombotic Factors.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, our interest was to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 during pregnancy on placenta and coagulation factors. METHODS: a prospective cohort study between January and July 2021 of 55 pregnant women stratified into: Group O, 16 patients with ongoing SARS-CoV-2 infection at delivery; Group R, 21 patients with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy but who recovered prior to delivery; Group C, 18 control patients with no infection at any time. All women had nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests performed within 72 h of delivery. Obstetrical complications were recorded and two physiological inhibitors of coagulation, protein Z (PZ) and dependent protease inhibitor (ZPI), were analyzed in maternal and cord blood. All placentae were analyzed by a pathologist for vascular malperfusion. RESULTS: No patient in any group had a severe COVID-19 infection. More obstetrical complications were observed in Group O (O: n = 6/16 (37%), R: n = 2/21 (10%), C: n = 1/18 (6%), p = 0.03). The incidence of placental vascular malperfusion was similar among the groups (O: n = 9/16 (56%), R: n = 8/21 (42%), C: n = 8/18 (44%), p = 0.68). No PZ or ZPI deficiency was associated with COVID-19. However, an increased ZPI/PZ ratio was observed in neonates of Group R (O: 82.6 (min 41.3-max 743.6), R: 120.7 (29.8-203.5), C: 66.8 (28.2-2043.5), p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 was associated with more obstetrical complications, but not an increased incidence of placental lesions or PZ and ZPI abnormalities.

Data-driven commentary on SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination, and fertility.

A recent study by Wesselink et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 20;kwac011. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac011. Online ahead of print) adds to the growing body of research finding that vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is safe for individuals either seeking pregnancy or who are pregnant. The study's authors found no effect of COVID-19 vaccination on fecundity in a population of individuals with no known infertility who were attempting conception. The finding reinforces the messaging of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 Task Force, the aim of which is to provide data-driven recommendations to individuals contemplating pregnancy in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. As safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines became available, and with an increasing number of studies showing a heightened risk of severe disease during pregnancy, an important role of the Task Force is to encourage vaccination during the preconceptual window and in early pregnancy. The Task Force supports ongoing research to address gaps in knowledge about safe and effective therapies and preventive measures for individuals contemplating pregnancy and during pregnancy. Such research will help optimize care for reproductive-age individuals in the face of current and future health crises.

Case Report: Post-Partum SARS-CoV-2 Infection After the First French Uterus Transplantation.

Absolute uterus factor infertility, whether congenital or acquired, renders the woman unable to carry a child. Although uterus transplantation (UTx) is being increasingly performed as a non-vital procedure to address this unfortunate condition, the immunosuppression required presents risks that are further compounded by pregnancy and during the puerperium period. These vulnerabilities require avoidance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant UTx recipients especially during the third trimester, as accumulating evidence reveals increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Here we describe a successful UTx case with delivery of a healthy child, but in which both mother and neonate developed asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection seven days after RNA vaccination, on day 35 post-partum. Although the patient was successfully treated with a combination therapy comprised of two monoclonal antibodies, this case highlights the challenges associated with performing UTx in the era of Covid-19. More broadly, the risks of performing non-vital organ transplantation during a pandemic should be discussed among team members and prospective patients, weighing the risks against the benefits in improving the quality of life, which were considerable for our patient who achieved motherhood with the birth of a healthy child.