SNOT-22 Quality of Life Scores Improve After Endoscopic Endonasal Repair of Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea can experience significant sinonasal symptom burden, leading to poor quality of life (QOL). The objective of this study was to investigate sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) scores in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery for spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and compare them to patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and CRSsNP was performed. Pre-surgery and post-surgery SNOT-22 scores and domains were compared within each group. Improvements in SNOT-22 scores after surgery were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were in the CSF rhinorrhea group and 105 patients were in the CRSsNP group. Within each group, surgery significantly improved total SNOT-22 scores, domain scores, and most of the individual symptoms. Comparing the 2 groups revealed similar improvements in total SNOT-22 scores (P = .244). The CSF rhinorrhea group improved more in runny nose (P < .001), postnasal discharge (P < .001), wake up at night (P = .024), and embarrassed (P = .002). The CRSsNP group improved more in sneezing (P = .027), nasal blockage (P < .001), decreased sense of smell/taste (P = .011), thick nasal discharge (P < .001), facial pain/pressure (P = .008), and the ear/facial domain (P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea experience significant symptom burden. Those who undergo CSF leak repair should experience significant improvement in QOL similar to patients who undergo ESS for CRSsNP as measured by SNOT-22.

Individual SNOT-22 Items Aid in Differentiating Between Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea and Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps.

OBJECTIVES: Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is a diagnostic challenge due to its overlapping symptomatology with other sinonasal diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate whether items on the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 could suggest a diagnosis of spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea versus chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review of patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and a control group of CRSsNP patients was performed. Individual SNOT-22 scores and domain scores were compared. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients were included in both cohorts. Of the patients in the CSF rhinorrhea group, 48% were misdiagnosed as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) prior to the correct identification of a CSF leak. On bivariate analysis, the CSF rhinorrhea group scored significantly higher on the SNOT-22 for runny nose (P < .001) and was more likely to designate this symptom as most important (P < .001). The CRSsNP group scored significantly higher in nasal blockage (P < .001), thick nasal discharge (P < .001), facial pain/pressure (P < .001), and in the ear/facial (P < .001) and rhinologic (P = .003) domains. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that runny nose (P < .001) was most predictive of spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea while nasal blockage (P < .001), thick nasal discharge (P < .001), and facial pain/pressure (P = .001) were predictive of CRSsNP after adjusting for relevant confounders. No significant difference was observed in total SNOT-22 scores between groups (P = .676). CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea is commonly misdiagnosed as other sinonasal pathologies. However, individual SNOT-22 items can help aid in suggesting a CSF leak. Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea should be suspected in patients who have high SNOT-22 scores for runny nose and report this symptom as most important, but have lower scores related to the other cardinal symptoms of CRS.

A Pilot Study Assessing the Incidence of Chronic Sinusitis Following Le Fort I Osteotomy in Maxillofacial Surgery.

Orthognathic surgery utilizing a Le Fort I osteotomy is performed regularly by oral surgeons to correct midface and dental occlusal abnormalities, yet little has been written discussing the impact these operations may have on sinonasal function. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of objective sinonasal inflammation and subjective sinonasal symptoms following the use of Le Fort I osteotomies for maxillary advancement surgery.Thirty-eight subjects who previously underwent Le Fort I osteotomies for purposes of elective orthognathic surgery were enrolled retrospectively to assess for evidence of rhinosinusitis (RS). Post-operative and, when available, preoperative maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained and evaluated using Lund Mackay scoring (LMS). The Chronic Sinusitis Survey - Duration Based (CSS-D) was completed to compare subjective symptoms before and after surgery.Evaluation of the CT scans demonstrated radiographic evidence of RS and subjective worsening of symptoms in 87% and 89% respectively. The mean CSS-D pre- and post-operative scores were 7.6 and 14.8 respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean calculated LMS was 3.39 (2.38-4.40, 95% C.I.). Further sub-analyses demonstrate an increase in both radiographic LMS and subjective CSS-D for patients who had persistent inferior meatal antrostomies after Le Fort I osteotomy.Le Fort I osteotomies performed during orthognathic surgery result in a higher prevalence of post-operative RS than what has been previously described. A better understanding of sinonasal mucocilliary function and the aberrancy that may be caused following such operations deserves further evaluation in order to identify and optimize postsurgical outcomes.