Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Intern Med J ; 53(5): 690-699, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36008359

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Residential InReach presents an alternative to hospital admission for aged care residents swabbed for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), although relative outcomes remain unknown. AIMS: To compare rates and predictors of 28-day mortality for aged care residents seen by InReach with COVID-19, or 'suspected COVID-19' (sCOVID), including hospital versus InReach-based care. METHODS: Prospective observational study of consecutive patients referred to a Victorian InReach service meeting COVID-19 testing criteria between April and October 2020 (prevaccine availability). COVID-19 was determined by positive polymerase chain reaction testing on nasopharyngeal swab. sCOVID-19 was defined as meeting symptomatic Victorian Government testing criteria but persistently swab negative. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) between 152 patients with COVID-19 and 118 patients with sCOVID. Similar results were found for 28-day mortality between patients with COVID-19 (35/152, 23%) and sCOVID (32/118, 27%) (P = 0.4). For the combined cohort, 28-day mortality was associated with initial oxygen saturation (P < 0.001), delirium (P < 0.001), hospital transfer for acuity (P = 0.02; but not public health/facility reasons), CFS (P = 0.04), prior ischaemic heart disease (P = 0.01) and dementia (P = 0.02). For patients with COVID-19, 28-day mortality was associated with initial oxygen saturation (P = 0.02), delirium (P < 0.001) and hospital transfer for acuity (P = 0.01), but not public health/facility reasons. CONCLUSION: Unvaccinated aged care residents meeting COVID-19 testing criteria seen by InReach during a pandemic experience high mortality rates, including with negative swab result. Residents remaining within-facility (with InReach) experienced similar adjusted mortality odds to residents transferred to hospital for public health/facility-based reasons, and lower than those transferred for clinical acuity.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , Humanos , Austrália , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/mortalidade , Teste para COVID-19 , Surtos de Doenças , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Hospitalização , Fatores de Risco
2.
Intern Med J ; 52(3): 386-395, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34783127

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted those in residential aged care facilities (RACF). This research was undertaken to explore and better understand the effects of the pandemic on the experience of next-of-kin and carers who encountered the death of a loved one who resided within a RACF during the pandemic. AIMS: To explore end-of-life experiences for residents who die in RACF and their next-of-kin/carers during the COVID-19 pandemic, to identify areas of concern and areas for improvement. METHODS: Prospective single-centre mixed methods research was undertaken involving telephone interview with next-of-kin or carers of residents who died within 30 days of being referred to Austin Health Residential InReach Service during the 'second wave' of COVID-19 in Melbourne, Australia, in 2020. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative description and aspects of grounded theory were used for analysing qualitative data. Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts used open and axial coding to identify initial themes and then to group these under major themes. RESULTS: Forty-one telephone interviews were analysed. Major themes identified included: COVID-19 pandemic, communication and technology, death and dying experience, bereavement and grief, and social supports and external systems. CONCLUSIONS: Findings identify the many COVID-19 pandemic-related challenges faced by participants and their dying loved one in RACF. Access to palliative care and bereavement support is crucial for dying residents and for grieving that has been made more difficult by the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Morte , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Diabetes Investig ; 8(1): 6-18, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27181363

RESUMO

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) represents a major component of the health burden associated with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Recent advances have produced an explosion of 'novel' assay-based risk markers for DKD, though clinical use remains restricted. Although many patients with progressive DKD follow a classical albuminuria-based pathway, non-albuminuric DKD progression is now well recognized. In general, the following clinical and biochemical characteristics have been associated with progressive DKD in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes: increased hemoglobin A1c, systolic blood pressure, albuminuria grade, early glomerular filtration rate decline, duration of diabetes, age (including pubertal onset) and serum uric acid; the presence of concomitant microvascular complications; and positive family history. The same is true in type 2 diabetes for male sex category, in patients following an albuminuric pathway to DKD, and also true for the presence of increased pulse wave velocity. The following baseline clinical characteristics have been proposed as risk factors for DKD progression, but with further research required to assess the nature of any relationship: dyslipidemia (including low-density lipoprotein, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol); elevated body mass index; smoking status; hyperfiltration; decreases in vitamin D, hemoglobin and uric acid excretion (all known consequences of advanced DKD); and patient test result visit-to-visit variability (hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). The development of multifactorial 'renal risk equations' for type 2 diabetes has the potential to simplify the task of DKD prognostication; however, there are currently none for type 1 diabetes-specific populations. Significant progress has been made in the prediction of DKD progression using readily available clinical data, though further work is required to elicit the role of several variables, and to consolidate data to facilitate clinical implementation.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Nefropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Progressão da Doença , Fatores Etários , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
4.
J Diabetes Complications ; 30(2): 256-61, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26794645

RESUMO

AIMS: Renal hyperfiltration is observed prior to the development of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM); however its significance remains uncertain. Longitudinal data were used to investigate the association between measured baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal function decline in patients with T1DM. METHODS: This study included 142 adult patients with T1DM and ≥2 measurements of glomerular filtration rate (mGFR; determined by diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid plasma clearance). Median follow up was 19 years. Patients were stratified by baseline mGFR quartile. The relationship between baseline mGFR and rate of renal function decline was assessed using random-effect generalized least squares regression, adjusted for age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, blood pressure, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy, LDL and BMI. RESULTS: The average rates of decline in renal function for the 2nd (baseline mGFR: 96.4-112.6 ml min-(1) 1.73 m-(2)), 3(rd) (baseline mGFR: 112.6-125.5 ml min- (1) 1.73 m-(2)) and 4th quartiles (baseline mGFR >125.5 ml min-(1) 1.73 m-(2)) were significantly faster than the first quartile (baseline mGFR: 60.9-96.4 ml min-(1) 1.73 m-(2)). In further detail, the average rates of decline in the 2nd (rate of decline 1.25 ml min- (1) 1.73 m-(2) per year, 95% CI: 0.97; 1.52, p=0.008), 3rd (rate of decline 1.35 ml min-(1) 1.73 m-(2) per year, 95% CI: 1.08; 1.62, p= 0.001) and 4th quartiles (rate of decline 1.6 ml min-(1) 1.73 m-(2) per year, 95% CI: 1.34, 1.88, <0.0001) were significantly faster when compared to the first quartile (rate of decline 0.67 ml min-(1) 1.73 m-(2) per year, 95% CI: 0.37; 0.96). Sub-analysis of quartile 4 revealed higher HbA1c measurements throughout follow-up in those with rapid mGFR decline (>3.0 ml min(-1)1.73 m(-2)/year). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T1DM, higher baseline mGFR is associate ed with more rapid mGFR decline. Patients with high baseline mGFR who developed rapid mGFR decline had higher HbA1c measurements throughout the study. These findings are consistent with the concept that poor glycaemic control over time may be a determining factor for the rapid renal function decline observed in some hyperfiltering patients.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Nefropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA