Satisfaction with resilient denture liner versus acrylic resin telescopic prostheses for patients with ectodermal dysplasia: A nonrandomized crossover clinical trial.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Patients with ectodermal dysplasia are characterized by anodontia or oligodontia. How their challenging prosthodontic rehabilitation might be optimized is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this crossover study was to evaluate the effect of resilient denture liner versus acrylic resin copings in complete overdentures for patients with ectodermal dysplasia. Outcome measures included patient satisfaction, retention, and periodontal health of the abutment tooth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten partially edentulous participants diagnosed with ectodermal dysplasia were recruited from the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt, and enrolled in this crossover clinical trial. All participants received acrylic resin coping-retained maxillary complete overdentures (group N, stage 1). The acrylic resin copings were then replaced by a resilient denture liner (group S, stage 2). Patient satisfaction, retention, and periodontal health parameters were evaluated 1 week and 3 months after the completion of each stage. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a validated, reliable questionnaire. The results of the periodontal probing depths were tested with repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons. Tooth mobility, patient satisfaction, retention, and gingival index were tested by using the Wilcoxon signed ranked test. Ordinal data as the sixth and seventh domains of patient satisfaction were tested by using the McNemar test for paired comparisons (α=.05). RESULTS: Three months after overdenture delivery, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding retention (P=.025), probing depth (P<.001), and gingival index (P=.011) favoring the acrylic resin coping-retained overdentures. Results of tooth mobility (P=.035), overall attitude (P=.041), ease of eating (P=.023), denture comfort (P=.024), and degree of teasing (P=.038) on wearing the denture showed a statistically significant difference between the groups, favoring the resilient denture liner. CONCLUSIONS: In children with oligodontia and ectodermal dysplasia, the resilient denture liner-retained maxillary complete overdenture enhanced patient satisfaction and tooth mobility of anterior teeth, while minimally jeopardizing the periodontal condition of the abutment teeth.

A histomorphometric study on treated and untreated ceramic filled PEEK implants versus titanium implants: Preclinical in vivo study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the osseo-integrative behavior of untreated (UCFP) and sandblasted ceramic filled PEEK (SCFP) implants in comparison with titanium implants through measurement of bone implant contact (BIC) and bone density (BD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine implants from each type were inserted into 9 dogs in which every experimental dog received the three different implants in the lower border of the mandible. The animals were euthanized after 3 months and extracting bone blocks containing implants followed by blocks preparation for histological examinations. RESULTS: BIC and BD were significantly higher in titanium and SCFP compared with UCFP group (p = .007) and (p = .012), respectively. Aluminum blasting increased the bone ingrowth and bone implant contact when compared to machined surfaces of untreated PEEK implants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, sandblasting with 110 µm aluminum oxide particles can be proposed as a suitable surface treatment that enhances hydrophilicity of CFP. Further in vivo animal studies are still needed to confirm the findings of this study.

Prognosis of dental implants in patients with low bone density: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Osteoporosis is a risk factor for implant success. Evidence for the prognosis of dental implants in patients with osteoporosis is still unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare implant success in patients with low versus normal bone density and to evaluate special techniques used to enhance implant success in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Searches were performed electronically in 4 databases (PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane, and Grey Literature) through July 2017 and manually to identify studies addressing the subject. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1071 participants. Seven studies compared implant success in low and normal bone density, and 4 compared implant success in special and conventional techniques of implant placement. The risk of bias in the assessment of cohort studies was critical; of nonrandomized clinical trials, serious; and of randomized clinical trials, high. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between implant survival in patients with low and normal bone density 5 years after implant placement. CONCLUSIONS: Implant survival in patients with low bone density seems to be feasible with special precautions. Implant placement using special adopted techniques might provide equivalent implant stability, survival, and marginal bone loss to normal bone. The quality of evidence is still unclear.

Can PEEK Be an Implant Material? Evaluation of Surface Topography and Wettability of Filled Versus Unfilled PEEK With Different Surface Roughness.

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites are biocompatible materials that may overcome the esthetic and allergic problems of titanium dental implants. However, their potential for osseointegration with a subsequent survival rate is still questionable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness and wettability of different surface-treated filled and unfilled PEEK specimens, which may be indicative of the osseointegration behavior and potential use of PEEK as an implant material. Unfilled, ceramic-filled (CFP) and carbon fiber-reinforced (CFRP) PEEK discs were prepared and left untreated or were surface treated with 50 µ, 110 µ, or 250 µ aluminum oxide particles. The roughness average (Ra) value of each disc was evaluated using a contact stylus profilometer. Their contact angles were measured to evaluate their wettability, which was compared among PEEK discs using ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test for pairwise comparisons ( P ≤ .05). Regarding the surface roughness, a significant difference was found between unfilled and filled PEEK when untreated and bombarded with 50 or 110 microns of aluminum oxide particles. For the contact angle, a significant difference was found only among the untreated PEEK materials. Among the evaluated PEEK materials, CFRP50, CFRP110 and CFP110 showed the most favorable Ra values with good wettability properties, thus being potential substrates for dental implants.

The effect of 2 versus 4 implants on implant stability in mandibular overdentures: A randomized controlled trial.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dental research is rich with articles that investigated the influence of host-site variables, some implant-related variables (implant length, diameter, taper, design, location, and surface topography), different loading protocols or surgical procedures, and measurement methodology on dental implant stability. However, the number of implants and its effect on implant stability remain unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate the influence of implant number on implant stability by comparing 2 versus 4 implants in mandibular implant overdentures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial included 20 participants with edentulous mandibular ridges. Participants were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups, a 4-implant (experimental) group consisting of 4 implants installed in lateral-canine and premolar regions; and a 2-implant (control) group, consisting of 2 implants in lateral-canine regions. Implant stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis at implant placement and then at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The Student t test was used to compare the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of the anterior implants in the 4-implant and 2-implant groups. One-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Bonferroni test was used to compare ISQ values among the different follow-up periods within each group (α=.05). RESULTS: Mean ISQ values for anterior implants in the 4-implant group were slightly higher than those recorded for the 2-implant group at all follow-up periods. However, these differences were not statistically significant (P>.05). Within-group comparison revealed an initial decrease in implant stability for all implants. This decrease was statistically significant for the 2-implant group (P<.001) and for posterior implants in the 4-implant group (P<.001). This was then followed by a gradual increase in ISQ values for all implants in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of implants from 2 to 4 in mandibular implant overdentures did not have a significant influence on implant stability.