Australian consensus: Treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis in the era of targeted therapies - Adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the treatment landscape for moderate-severe psoriasis has rapidly evolved. The Australasian College of Dermatologists sought to review and update previously published treatment goals for moderate-severe psoriasis. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used. Comprehensive literature review and guideline evaluation resulted in the development of statements and other questions to establish current clinical practices. Two rounds of anonymous voting were undertaken, with a collaborative meeting held in between to discuss areas of discordance. Overall, consensus was defined as achievement of ≥75% agreement in the range 7-9 on a 9-point scale (1 strongly disagree; 9 strongly agree). RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on 26/29 statements in round 1 and a further 20 statements in round 2. There was strong agreement to expanding the classification/definition of psoriasis severity by including a choice of metrics, incorporating quality of life measures, and widening the scope of high-impact sites. Consensus was also reached on revised treatment response criteria, which were then incorporated into a new treatment algorithm. There was discordance with the current requirement to undertake a trial with established systemic agents before accessing targeted therapy. CONCLUSION: The ability of new targeted treatment options to change the narrative in psoriasis patient care can only be properly realised if challenges to timely and equitable access are addressed. The proposed framework for the assessment, classification and management of moderate-severe psoriasis aligns with international recommendations. Its adoption into Australian clinical practice is hoped to improve treatment outcomes and patients' satisfaction with their care.

Treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: an Australian consensus.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The high incidence of comorbidities in patients with psoriasis, significant impact on quality of life and patients' dissatisfaction with treatment led a European group to develop a consensus position on psoriasis treatment goals. There is an evident need for similar treatment goals in Australia. The aim of this project was to develop Australian treatment goals that reflect the local environment. METHODS: A panel of 12 representatives was drawn from across Australia consisting of nine dermatologists and a rheumatologist, a dermatology nurse and a general practitioner (GP)/dermatology trainee. The group met on three occasions between September 2011 and March 2012. The panel undertook a literature review and critically examined available evidence-based treatment goals. A questionnaire relating to psoriasis assessment and specific treatment outcomes was developed. Following discussion and debate, recommended treatment goals for psoriasis patients in Australia were determined. RESULTS: The panel agreed by consensus on recommended psoriasis treatment goals in the Australian environment. There was recognition that in addition to psoriasis area severity index (PASI) assessment, a quality of life assessment was highly relevant in determining psoriasis severity and treatment outcome. Mild psoriasis was defined as PASI ≤ 10 and a dermatology life quality index (DLQI) ≤ 10, with moderate to severe psoriasis defined as PASI > 10 and/or DLQI > 10. The presence of certain definedclinical features would elevate a patient's classification from mild to moderate/severe. The target for treatment was defined as a maintained change in PASI ≥ 75% improvement and DLQI ≤ 5. These largely concurred with the European treatment goals. A flow chart for psoriasis management in Australia based on outcome measures was developed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to identify and articulate treatment goals for psoriasis. Assessment of psoriasis severity requires both physical scoring (PASI) and consideration of quality of life measures (DLQI). Identification of treatment goals will guide clinicians in treatment decision-making, enhance the availability and appropriate use of therapies and increase patient satisfaction with their care.