Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

AIMS: To compare skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue changes between Twin block and early fixed orthodontic appliance for class II division 1 malocclusion treatment through a randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sample and randomization: This study was a randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio in which 40 patients were divided equally into two groups: control and experimental; each group had an equal number of boys and girls. Randomization was achieved using random blocks of 20 patients with allocation concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes. Blinding was only applicable for data analysis of radiographic measurements. Intervention: Twin block appliance was used in the experimental group for 1 year. However, control group was treated with fixed appliance. Inclusion criteria: Skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular retrognathism; cephalometric angular measurements: SNA ≥ 82, SNB ≤ 78, ANB ≥ 4; overjet ≥6 mm; and patient in circumpubertal stage cervical vertebral maturation (CVM2 and CVM3). Parameters for evaluation: Cephalometric skeletal, dental, and soft tissue angular and linear measurements were used for evaluation. RESULTS: SNB increased remarkably by 4° in the Twin block group, but only by 0.68 in the control group. There was a significant decrease in vertical dimensions (SN-GoGn) in the Twin block group compared to control group (p = 0.002). Significant enhancement in the facial profile of the patients was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The Twin block appliance induced significant skeletal and dental changes. These changes were more obvious relative to the slight changes induced by natural growth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Early treatment of Class II due to mandibular retrusion with Twin block functional appliance is recommended due to its favourable skeletal effect. Early treatment with fixed appliance affects mainly the dentoalveolar component. Long term follow-up is needed for further insights.

Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics.

AIM: To evaluate the reliability of linear and angular measurements taken using different software programs in orthodontics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of four software programs from different manufacturers, namely MicroDicom viewer, Photoshop® CS3, AutoCAD®, and Image-Pro®, were used for measuring the geometric features of four types of miniscrews from different manufacturers. Each miniscrew type presented a group: Group I, Tomas® (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany); Group II, HUBIT® (HUBIT, Gyeonggi-do, Korea); Group III, AbsoAnchor® (Dentos, Daegu, Korea); and Group IV, Creative (Creative, Zhejiang, China). Measurements of apical face angle, thread angle, lead angle, flank, pitch depth, and width were taken on 45 × magnification scanning electron microscope images of the shafts of the miniscrews. One assessor measured the seven geometric features for the four types of miniscrews using the four software programs twice in two sessions separated by a three week interval. RESULTS: Pairwise comparisons, for each of the four miniscrew groups, showed that the only common result observed was the significant difference (p < 0.001) between measurements of flank taken by the four software programs. When measurements of the four types of miniscrews were pooled into one group, a high degree of intra-rater reliability (ICC range from 0.9 to 1.0) for all the seven geometric features was found with all the four software programs. The paired t-test showed insignificant difference (at p ≤ 0.05) between the first and second measurements, except for a few measurements including pitch width measured by Image-Pro® (p = 0.012), MicroDicom (p = 0.023), and Photoshop® (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results did not give absolute superiority to one software program over the others and suggested an assessor effect. Assessor estimates could have been affected, among other factors, by the design of the miniscrews and the technical features of the software programs.

Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs).

Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have been introduced into orthodontic clinical practice in order to allow tooth movements while avoiding strain on adjacent teeth. Miniscrews are available in the market with different diameters and materials. Accordingly, the purpose of the present report was to measure and compare the forces to bend and fracture different mini implants. Ti-6Al-4V titanium and stainless steel TADs of different manufacturers (Spider ScrewHDC; Mini Implants⁻Leone; Benefit⁻Orteam; Storm⁻Kristal) were evaluated. Two different diameters (1.5 mm and 2.0 mm) were tested. The sample included 10 unused specimens for each group, blocked in an Instron Universal Testing Machine, and a shear load was applied at the neck of the miniscrew. The force to bend the miniscrew was measured at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections. Also, the maximum force before screw fracture was recorded. Data were submitted for statistical analysis. Results showed significantly higher forces for 2.0 mm than 1.5 mm screws, both at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections and at maximum load. Moreover, no significant differences were reported between titanium and stainless steel miniscrews of equal diameters.

Influence of geometric design characteristics on primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of geometric design characteristics on primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty self-drilling miniscrews with different geometric design characteristics were divided into the following groups (n = 10): group I-Tomas® (Dentaurum, Germany), group II-AbsoAnchor® (Dentos, Korea), group III-HUBIT® miniscrew (HUBIT, Korea), group IV-Creative® (China). The four types were conical miniscrews with 1.6 mm diameter and 6.0 mm length. The miniscrews were manually inserted perpendicular to cow ribs until the full thread length was reached with the help of a 1.3 mm predrilled pilot hole. Each miniscrew was evaluated using scanning electron microscope. Linear and angular measurements were taken using Photoshop CS3 software. Miniscrew stability was measured by the Periotest® and pullout test. RESULTS: All linear and angular measurements of the geometric characteristics showed significant differences between the four groups (p ≤ 0.001). Results of the pullout test showed significant differences between the four groups (p ≤ 0.001), while the Periotest® values showed no significant differences (p = 0.122). A multiple linear regression analysis revealed the significant predictors for higher pullout: a larger flank, a higher value for the thread angle, lead angle, and apical face angle (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic miniscrews' geometric design characteristics significantly affected the primary stability. Larger pitch width, flank, thread angle, apical face angle, and/or lead angle led to higher primary stability. Smaller a thread shape factor (TSF) also improved primary stability. Varying these characteristics may enhance miniscrew design.