Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 14(9): e28898, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36237753

RESUMO

Background The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) virus has caused millions of deaths. It is difficult to differentiate between pure viral COVID-19 pneumonia and secondary infection. Clinicians often use procalcitonin (PCT) to decide on empiric antibiotic therapy. Methodology We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted with COVID-19 between January 1st, 2020, and June 30th, 2020. Patient demographics, clinical findings, and laboratory findings with a focus on PCT levels were recorded. Coinfection was considered if clinicians ordered a septic workup (urine, blood, and respiratory cultures) or if the physicians started or escalated antimicrobial therapy. PCT levels on the day of culture and daily for the next three days were recorded. Significant PCT change was defined as a decrease in PCT levels of >50% from the initial elevated PCT level. Results In total, 143 (59.8%) patients had one secondary infection. These included pulmonary infections (118, 49.4%), blood infections (99, 41.4%), and urine infections (64, 26.8%). Many patients had more than one documented positive culture: respiratory system and blood together in 80 (33.4%) patients, sputum and urine in 55 (23.1%) patients, and urine and blood in 46 (19.2%) patients. Out of the 143 patients with a positive culture, PCT was abnormal on the day of positive culture in 93 (65.5%), while PCT was abnormal in 64 out of 96 on the day of negative culture (66.7%) (p = 0.89). Individual analysis for PCT levels of respiratory cultures showed out of 118 positive sputum cultures, 86 (72%) had abnormal PCT on the day of culture. PCT in positive versus negative cultures was not significantly different, with median PCT (interquartile range, IQR) of 1.66 (6.61) versus 1.03 (2.23) (p = 0.172). For blood cultures, out of 99 positive blood cultures, 73 (73%) had abnormal PCT levels on the day of the culture. PCT in positive versus negative cultures was significantly elevated, with a median of 1.61 (5.97) vs. 0.65 (1.77) (p < 0.001). For urine, out of 64 positive cultures, 41 (64.1%) had abnormal PCT levels on the day of the culture. PCT in positive versus negative cultures was not significantly different, with a median of 0.71 (2.92) vs. 0.93 (4.71) (p = 0.551). To observe the change in PCT after culture, PCT values for the next three days after culture were analyzed. We found that patients with positive cultures had higher PCT levels than those with negative cultures. There was no significant improvement over the following three days. Patients with abnormal PCT on the day of the suspected infection had a longer length of stay in the hospital, with a median (IQR) of 23.9 days (3.16) vs. 16.9 days (2.18) (p = 0.021). Conclusions Secondary coinfections in patients with COVID-19 infections are not associated with PCT elevation on the day of suspected secondary infection. However, most patients with bacteremia had a significant elevation of PCT on the day of bacteremia before collection and reporting of positive culture. Patients with abnormal PCT levels on the day of suspected infection had a longer hospital stay than patients with normal PCT levels. Subsequent testing of PCT in patients showed no significant improvement in PCT.

2.
Cureus ; 14(7): e26977, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35989831

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections may have been associated with secondary infection. Community-acquired or hospital-acquired such infections affect clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the impact of these infections on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Dubai hospital. RESULTS: Patients with secondary non-viral infections (SNIs) have higher mortality than patients without SNIs (57.3% vs. 43.7%, p=0.037). Patients with SNIs had more days on mechanical ventilation (MV) 19(11-27) vs. 5(2-10) p<0.001, more LOSICU 22 (15-33) vs. 7 (2-11) p<0.001, and more length of stay in hospital (LOSH) 28 (18-45) vs. 11.5 (6-19), p<0.001. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that SNIs do not predict mortality. Linear logistic regression analysis showed patients with SNIs have increased length of stay in ICUs (LOSICUs), length of stay in hospitals (LOSHs), and prolonged needs for MV. CONCLUSION: SNIs are high in patients admitted to ICU for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although they do not impact mortality, they prolong the need for MV, LOSICU, and LOSH.

3.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther ; 54(5): 378-386, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36734448

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has caused 4 million deaths as of 24 August 2021. A significant number of patients were admitted to undesignated ICU areas before transfer to a desig-nated ICU owing to the unavailability of ICU beds. We aim to compare the mortality and length of stay of patients in these 2 areas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied all critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who were admitted to Dubai hospital between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2020. Patients who transferred to wards other than designated ICU constitute cases, while those who were admitted directly to designated ICUs constitute controls. The demographics, clinical parameters, and treatment profile of these patients were recorded and compared. Mortality and length of stay were calculated. RESULTS: The sample includes 239 subjects (admitted to an undesignated ICU ward [n = 107] and directly admitted to a designated ICU ward [n = 132]). Patients admitted to an undesignated ICU had extra transfers between wards and had more days on MV (median [IQR] 18 (19) vs. 11 (14); P = 0.001), greater length of stay in the ICU (median [IQR]) 21.5 (19) vs. 15 (14); P = 0.001), and greater length of stay in hospital (median [IQR] 32 (28) vs. 21 (26); P = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that patients treated at an undesignated ICU have better survival (odds of death for patients cared for at an undesignated ICU was 0.347 with CI 0.178-0.676; P = 0.002). Multiple linear regression analysis also showed that patients treated at an undesignated ICU had longer stay - 4.2 days, CI 1.3-7.13, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Admission to an undesignated ICU impacts mortality and length of ICU and hospital stay.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Mortalidade Hospitalar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...