Mobile integrated health-community paramedicine programs' effect on emergency department visits: An exploratory meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Mobile Integrated Health Community Paramedicine (MIH-CP) programs are designed to increase access to care and reduce Emergency Department (ED) and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) usage. Previous MIH-CP systematic reviews reported varied interventions, effect sizes, and a high prevalence of biased methods. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis on MIH-CP effect on ED visits, and to evaluate study designs' effect on reported effect sizes. We hypothesized biased methods would produce larger reported effect sizes. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus databases for peer-reviewed MIH-CP literature from January 1, 2000, to July 24, 2021. We included all full-text English studies whose program met the National Associations of Emergency Medical Technicians definition, reported ED visits, and had an MIH-CP related intervention and outcome. We established risk ratios for each included study through interpreting the reported data. We performed a random-effects and cumulative meta-analysis of ED visit data, tests of heterogeneity, and a moderator analysis to assess for factors influencing the magnitude of observed effect. RESULTS: We identified 16 studies that reported ED visit data and included 12 in our meta-analysis. All studies were observational; 3 used matched controls, 6 pre-post controls, and 3 without controls. 7 studies' intervention were diversion/triage while 5 studies intervened with health education/home primary care services. Pooled risk ratio for our data set was 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.42-0.74). Cumulative meta-analysis revealed that as of 2018 MIH-CP programs began to show consistent reductions in ED visits. Significant heterogeneity was seen among studies, with I-squared >90%. Moderator analysis showed reduced heterogeneity for matched-control studies. CONCLUSION: Our data revealed MIH-CP programs were associated with a reduced risk of ED visits. Study design did not have a statistically significant influence on effect size, though it did influence heterogeneity. We would recommend future studies continue to use high levels of control to produce reliable data with lower heterogeneity.

A Systematic Review of Methodologies and Outcome Measures of Mobile Integrated Health-Community Paramedicine Programs.

INTRODUCTION: Mobile integrated health-community paramedicine (MIH-CP) uses patient-centered, mobile resources in the out-of-hospital environment to increase access to care and reduce unnecessary emergency department (ED) usage. The objective of this systematic review is to characterize the outcomes and methodologies used by MIH-CP programs around the world and assess the validity of the ways programs evaluate their effectiveness. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched for peer-reviewed literature related to MIH-CP programs. We included all full-length studies whose programs met the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians definition, had MIH-CP-related interventions, and measured outcomes. We excluded all non-English papers, abstract-only, and incomplete studies. RESULTS: Our initial literature review identified 6434 titles. We screened 178 full-text studies to assess for eligibility and identified 33 studies to include in this review. These 33 include four randomized controlled trials, 17 cohort studies, eight 8 case series, and four 4 cross-sectional studies. Of the 29 non-randomized trials, five used matched controls, 13 used pre-post, and 11 used no controls. Outcomes measured were hospital usage (24 studies), ED visits (15), EMS usage (23), patient satisfaction (8), health-related outcomes (8), and cost (9). Studies that evaluated hospital usage reported one of several outcome measures: hospital admissions (11), ED length of stay (3), and hospital readmission rate (2). EMS usage was measured by ambulance transports (12) and EMS calls (10). Cost outcomes observed were ambulance transport savings (7), ED visit savings (4), hospital admission savings (3), and cost per quality-adjusted life year (2). CONCLUSION: Most studies assessing MIH-CP programs reported success of their interventions. However, significant heterogeneity of outcome measures and varying quality of study methodologies exist among studies. Future studies designed with adequately matched controls and applying uniform core metrics for cost savings and health care usage are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of MIH-CP programs.

Discrepancy Between Invasive and Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients with Sepsis by Vasopressor Status.

INTRODUCTION: Blood pressure (BP) monitoring is an essential component of sepsis management. The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines recommend invasive arterial BP (IABP) monitoring, although the benefits over non-invasive BP (NIBP) monitoring are unclear. This study investigated discrepancies between IABP and NIBP measurement and their clinical significance. We hypothesized that IABP monitoring would be associated with changes in management among patients with sepsis requiring vasopressors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adult patients admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit at a quaternary medical center between January 1-December 31, 2017. We included patients with sepsis conditions AND IABP monitoring. We defined a clinically significant BP discrepancy (BPD) between NIBP and IABP measurement as a difference of > 10 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) AND change of BP management to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mm Hg. RESULTS: We analyzed 127 patients. Among 57 (45%) requiring vasopressors, 9 (16%) patients had a clinically significant BPD vs 2 patients (3% odds ratio [OR] 6.4; 95% CI: 1.2-30; P = 0.01) without vasopressors. In multivariable logistic regression, higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.02-1.73; P = 0.03) and serum lactate (OR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.003-1.60, P = 0.04) were associated with increased likelihood of clinically significant BPD. There were no complications (95% CI: 0-0.02) from arterial catheter insertions. CONCLUSION: Among our population of septic patients, the use of vasopressors was associated with increased odds of a clinically significant blood pressure discrepancy between IABP and NIBP measurement. Additionally, higher SOFA score and serum lactate were associated with higher likelihood of clinically significant blood pressure discrepancy. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations and investigate the benefits vs the risk of harm of IABP monitoring in patients with sepsis.

Prevalence of myocardial infarction among patients with chest pain and cocaine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cocaine abuse is a public health burden. Cocaine is known to cause vasospasm and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The prevalence of AMI in patients presenting with chest pain and concurrent cocaine use (CPCC) varies among studies. We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the current literature for the prevalence of AMI in patients with CPCC. METHODS: We performed a literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from its beginning to May 18, 2020 and updated this search on February 18, 2021. Full-text studies that assessed the primary outcome (AMI) specifically among patients with CPCC who presented to the emergency department (ED) were included. We excluded studies that were not in English, did not take place in the ED, and case reports, which only reported positive cases and not incidence of AMI. Random effect meta-analysis was performed to assess the prevalence of primary outcome and to examine correlations between risk factors and AMI. Heterogeneity was assessed by I-square value. We also performed subgroup analysis to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: We identified 2178 studies and screened 102 full-text studies to include 16 studies (3269 patients) in our final analysis. The pooled prevalence of AMI was 4.7% (95% CI 0.8-23), I-square of 84%. However, rates among studies of low risk patients were lower (1.1% 95% CI 0.2-5) compared to studies of mixed risk patients (7.7%, 95% 5-11). A meta-regression was used to look at correlation between risk factors and AMI and found that AMI was positively correlated in patients with a history of CAD (correlation coefficient [Corr. Coeff.] 5.6, 96% CI 2.3-8.7), HTN (Corr. Coeff. 2.9, 95% CI 0.9-4.9), DM (Corr. Coeff. 8.0, 95% CI 2.4-14), HLD (Corr. Coeff. 5.9, 95% CI 2.4, 9). Sources of potential heterogeneity included patients' risk as defined by the authors, study designs, publication year, and study sample size. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of AMI and death among patients with cocaine-associated chest pain was relatively low, although high risk patients were still associated with high prevalence of AMI. Clinicians should consider risk-stratify these patients and treat them accordingly.

Safety Matters: A Meta-analysis of Interhospital Transport Adverse Events in Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Interhospital transport (IHT) is common among critically ill patients. Our meta-analysis investigated the prevalence and possible factors associated with adverse events (AEs) during IHT. METHODS: Searching PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until February 12, 2021, we included studies that a priori defined AEs for adult medical patients. We excluded case reports, non-full-text, and non-English language studies. We performed a random effects meta-analysis and moderator analyses. RESULTS: We identified 554 studies and included 19 studies (14,969 patients) in our final analysis. The mean patients' (standard deviation) age was 60 (13.7). The pooled medical AEs for IHT was 1,059 (11%, 95% confidence interval, 7.5%-16%). The most common AE (n, %) was hypotension (424, 2.8%). Moderator analyses and meta-regressions suggested that conditions (P < .001) such as respiratory failure from coronavirus infection (88%), stroke (19%), and the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (40%) were associated with higher AE prevalence. Transport by nurses (31%) and physicians (11%) was associated with a higher AE prevalence, whereas transport type did not influence AE prevalence. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests the prevalence of AEs of critically ill patients during IHT is low and likely due to patients' disease severity. Further studies should focus on interventions to mitigate AEs to improve patients' outcomes.

Arterial or cuff pressure: Clinical predictors among patients in shock in a critical care resuscitation unit.

OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure (BP) measurement is essential for managing patients with hypotension. There are differences between invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP) and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements. However, the clinical applicability of these differences in patients with shock [need for vasopressor or serum lactate ≥ 4 millimole per liter (mmol/L)] has not been reported. This study investigated differences in IABP and NIBP as well as changes in clinical management in critically ill patients with shock. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult patients admitted to the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit (CCRU). Adult patients who received IABP upon admission between 01/01/2017-12/31/2017 with non-hypertensive diseases were eligible. The primary outcome, clinically relevant difference (CRD), was defined as difference of 10 mm of mercury (mmHg) between IABP and NIBP and change of blood pressure management according to goal mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg. We performed forward stepwise multivariable logistic regression to measure associations. RESULTS: Sample size calculation recommended 200 patients, and we analyzed 263. 121 (46%) patients had shock, 23 (9%) patients had CRD. Each mmol/L increase in serum lactate was associated with 11% higher likelihood of having CRD (OR 1.11, 95%CI 1.002-1.2). Peripheral artery disease and any kidney disease was significantly associated with higher likelihood of MAP difference ≥ 10 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Approximately 9% of patients with shock had clinically-relevant MAP difference. Higher serum lactate was associated with higher likelihood of CRD. Until further studies are available, clinicians should consider using IABP in patients with shock.

Preventing seizure occurrence following spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis of seizure prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high mortality and high morbidity, including seizures. Seizure prophylaxis is "not recommended" by the American Stroke Association, but practice variation still exists due to inconclusive data. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the current relevant literature to determine the efficacy of seizure prophylaxis following ICH. METHODS: We performed searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to September 15, 2020. We included observational and randomized controlled studies reporting seizure prophylaxis and occurrence in adults with ICH. Outcomes were seizures, as defined by the authors, within 14 days of ICH and at the longest point of follow-up. We used random-effects models to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for seizure prophylaxis and outcomes. The PROSPERO registration was CRD42019140493. RESULTS: We included 8 studies (2852 patients) in our analysis. The mean (± standard deviation) age of the pooled patients was 65 (±4) years; 39 % (± 5%) were female. Seizure prophylaxis did not prevent seizures at the longest follow-up time (OR 0.708, 95 % CI 0.438-1.143, p = 0.158, I2 = 34 %). This result was confirmed in subgroup analyses using categorical variables and in meta-regressions using continuous variables. Additionally, seizure prophylaxis was not associated with preventing early seizures, defined as < 14 days of ICH (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.21-2.08, p = 0.48, I2 = 35 %). CONCLUSION: Seizure prophylaxis following ICH was not associated with seizure prevention in adults. Most included studies were observational. Further randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of seizure prophylaxis in high-risk patients and different types of antiepileptic drugs are needed.

Predictors of clinically relevant differences between noninvasive versus arterial blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: Blood pressure (BP) measurements are important for managing patients with hypertensive emergencies (HE). Previous studies showed that there was significant difference between IABP and NIBP but no information whether these differences changed management. Our study investigated the factors associated with the differences affecting BP management of patients with HE. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult patients admitted to a resuscitation unit. We screened all patients who received IABP upon admission between 06/01/2017 and 12/31/2017 as sample size calculation recommended 64 patients. Primary outcome was the clinical relevance of the difference of IABP vs. NIBP, which was defined as having both: a) difference of 10 mm of mercury (mmHg), and b) resulting in possible change of blood pressure managements according to treatment guidelines. We performed backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression to measure associations. RESULTS: We analyzed 147 patients whose mean age was 69 (±16) years and included 69 (47%) patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Mean difference between IABP and NIBP was 21 (±16) mmHg while 41 (28%) patients who had difference affecting managements. In multivariable regression, sICH (Odd Ratios 13.5, 95%CI 2.3-79.5, p-value < 0.001) was significantly associated with clinically relevant difference between the two modalities of BP monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: There was a large difference between IABP and NIBP among patients with hypertensive emergencies. Up to 30% of patients had clinically relevant differences. Patients with sICH were more likely to have differences affecting BP management. Further studies are needed to confirm our observation.