Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Chromatogr A ; 1216(46): 8110-6, 2009 Nov 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19586630

RESUMO

A rapid confirmatory multi-residue method for the analysis of tetracyclines, sulphonamides, trimethoprim and dapsone by UPLC-MS/MS is described. The method is able to quantify and confirm the following 19 compounds, oxytetracycline, tetracycline, chlortetracycline, doxycycline, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfapyridine, trimethoprim, sulfamerazine, sulfamethizole, sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfamonomethoxine, sulfachlorpyridazine, dapsone, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole, sulfaquinoxaline and sulfadimethoxine. Samples are extracted with 0.1M EDTA and acetonitrile, which is then evaporated under a stream of nitrogen and reconstituted in water. Following centrifugation and filtering, an aliquot is analysed by UPLC-MS/MS using positive electrospray ionisation and multiple reaction monitoring. The method is deemed rapid as all analytes are extracted by a single extraction technique, with no solid-phase extraction clean up required. Validation is according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC and was carried out for bovine, porcine, ovine and poultry species. Specificity, recovery, repeatability, reproducibility, CCalpha and CCbeta data is presented.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/análise , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Resíduos de Drogas/análise , Músculos/química , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Animais , Antibacterianos/isolamento & purificação , Bovinos , Dapsona/análise , Dapsona/isolamento & purificação , Resíduos de Drogas/isolamento & purificação , Aves Domésticas , Ovinos , Sulfonamidas/análise , Sulfonamidas/isolamento & purificação , Tetraciclina/análise , Tetraciclina/isolamento & purificação , Trimetoprima/análise , Trimetoprima/isolamento & purificação
2.
Anal Chim Acta ; 624(1): 1-15, 2008 Aug 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18706307

RESUMO

The development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria has been attributed to the overuse of antimicrobials in human medicine. Another route by which humans are exposed to antibiotics is through the animal foods we eat. In modern agricultural practice, veterinary drugs are being used on a large scale, administered for treating infection or prophylactically to prevent infection. Hence, there is pressure on analytical scientists to detect and confirm the presence of antimicrobials in foods of animal origin. The aminoglycosides and macrolides are two families of antibiotics, each with important applications in veterinary medicine. These antibiotics are widely used in the treatment of bacterial disease, e.g., aminoglycosides for mastitis and macrolides for enteric infections. They have also been used as feed additives for growth promotion. As a result, legislation has been laid down by the European commission in which member states must meet strict criteria for monitoring residues (including antimicrobials). Testing for low levels of aminoglycosides and macrolides in foods is a priority and hence the development of fast, reliable, sensitive methods for their extraction and subsequent analysis is of great interest. This paper reviews analytical methods for both extracting and determining these classes of antibiotics in various food matrices focusing in particular on the last 10 years. Extraction and clean-up methods such as deproteinisation, and solid-phase extraction are described. Various screening methods are also covered including thin layer chromatography (TLC), enzyme immunoassay, capillary electrophoresis (CE) and microbiological assays. Finally, liquid chromatography (LC) methods are discussed which are combined with mass spectrometry (MS) when sensitivity requirements are stringent.


Assuntos
Aminoglicosídeos/análise , Antibacterianos/análise , Resíduos de Drogas/análise , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Macrolídeos/análise , Métodos Analíticos de Preparação de Amostras/métodos , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Contaminação de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência
3.
J Infect ; 50(1): 61-5, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15603842

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether or not Ireland can be considered as Trichinella-free, after more than 30 years of no reported infections in domestic and sylvatic animals and in humans. METHODS: Samples of muscle tissue from the tongue, masseter, and foreleg of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) were subjected to artificial digestion and to multiplex-PCR analysis for identifying Trichinella larvae at the species level. RESULTS: Four of 454 examined foxes were positive for larvae (overall prevalence 0.9%). The positive foxes had been collected in Donegal County (one fox; prevalence of 7.7%), Cork County (two foxes; 3.1%), and Waterford County (one fox; 4.2%). All larvae were identified as Trichinella spiralis. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of Trichinella-positive foxes in Ireland is an example of how the lack of infections among domestic animals and humans does not suffice for establishing Trichinella-free status. The results also confirm that the sylvatic cycle can last for tens of years, independently of the existence of a domestic cycle.


Assuntos
Animais Selvagens/parasitologia , Raposas/parasitologia , Helmintíase Animal/epidemiologia , Trichinella spiralis/isolamento & purificação , Triquinelose/veterinária , Animais , DNA de Helmintos/análise , Helmintíase Animal/parasitologia , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Larva/classificação , Larva/genética , Músculos/parasitologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Trichinella spiralis/classificação , Trichinella spiralis/genética , Triquinelose/epidemiologia , Triquinelose/parasitologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA