RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, the definition of large-volume liposuction is the removal of 5 L or more of total aspirate. Higher volumes of lipoaspirate come into consideration with higher BMIs, because more than 5 L is often required to achieve a satisfactory aesthetic result. The boundaries of what lipoaspirate volume is considered safe are based on historical opinion and are constantly in question. OBJECTIVES: Because to date there have been no scientific data available to support a specific safe maximum volume of lipoaspirate, the authors discuss necessary conditions for safe high-volume lipoaspirate extraction. METHODS: This retrospective study included 310 patients who had liposuction of ≥5 L over a 30-month period. All patients had 360° liposuction alone or in combination with other procedures. RESULTS: Patient ages ranged from 20 to 66 with a mean age of 38.5 (SD = 9.3). Average operative time was 202 minutes (SD = 83.1). Mean total aspirate was 7.5 L (SD = 1.9). An average of 1.84 L (SD = 0.69) of intravenous fluids and 8.99 L (SD = 1.47) of tumescent fluid were administered. Urine output was maintained above 0.5 mL/kg/hr. There were no major cardiopulmonary complications or cases requiring blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume liposuction is safe if proper preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative protocols and techniques are employed. The authors believe that this bias should be modified and that sharing their experience with high-volume liposuction may help guide other surgeons to incorporate this practice with confidence and safety for better patient outcomes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Wound complications after midline sternotomy result in significant morbidity and mortality. Despite many known risk factors, the influence of sternal asymmetry has largely been ignored. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of 3-dimensional computed tomographic scan reconstructions to assess sternal asymmetry and determine its relationship with sternal wound infection. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent midline sternotomy and received a postoperative computed tomographic scan between 2009 and 2010. Cases were composed of all patients who had a sternal wound infection after undergoing sternotomy. Controls were randomly selected from patients without poststernotomy wound complications. Sternal asymmetry was defined as the difference between the left and the right sternal halves and was expressed as a percentage of the total sternal volume. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases were identified and 32 controls were selected as described earlier. The patients were similar in baseline characteristics and risk factors including age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative creatinine, and operative time. Univariate factors associated with sternal wound infection include an asymmetry of 10% or greater, body mass index, and internal mammary artery harvest. In a multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors of sternal wound infection included an asymmetry of 10% or greater (odds ratio, 3.6; P = 0.03) and diabetes (odds ratio, 3.3; P = 0.0442). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest an association between asymmetric sternotomy and sternal wound infections. We recommend an assessment of sternal asymmetry to be performed in patients with sternal wound infection and if it is found to be 10% or greater, the surgeon should implement measures that stabilize the sternum.