The Effects of Zataria multiflora Cream on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor-Site Management: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Purpose: The wound healing process involves a complex series of biological events. Skin grafts have several uses as a reconstructive method. There are several dressings for the skin graft donor site, but the optimum dressing agents that provide all the requirements at the same time are unclear. This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of Zataria multiflora cream in the wound healing process of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites and compared it with a placebo. Materials and Methods: This clinical trial study was performed on patients who underwent split-thickness skin grafts. Enrolled patients applied Z. multiflora cream and placebo controlled (petrolatum ointment) twice a day, from the day of intervention at the skin graft donor sites in two parts, separately. On 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after surgery, the wound healing process was evaluated, photographed, and scored according to the Bates-Jensen assessment tool. Evidence of infection was evaluated. The main agent and placebo were compared during the wound healing process. Results: Decreases in wound surface area and total score were significantly greater in the Z. multiflora group (p < 0.05). The wounds of 30% of patients in the second week and 90% of patients in the third week were completely epithelialized in the Z. multiflora group. These values were 3.3% and 36.7% for the control group, respectively, and so, the healing rate was ∼9-fold in the second week and 2.45-fold in the third week in the Z. multiflora group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Wound healing and reepithelialization accelerated significantly in the first, second, third, and fourth week after intervention in the Z. multiflora treatment group, due to modulating the inflammatory phase and improving the proliferative phase. Clinical Trial Registration Number: IRCT20210624051695N1.

Efficacy of Topical Losartan in Management of Mammoplasty and Abdominoplasty Scars: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Annually, millions of people suffer from skin scars' psychological and physical disadvantages. Pathologic scars prevention is challenging and requires developing feasible and effective therapeutic strategies. Regarding promising results of losartan (an angiotensin 1 receptor inhibitor) on skin scar in preclinical studies, we aimed to assess the losartan ointment's impact on surgical scars in a clinical setting. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty-four patients with surgical wounds were enrolled from Razi hospital's plastic and reconstructive surgery department. The patients were trained to apply ointments 14-18 days post-surgery on the determined scar side, twice a day for 6 months. Two dermatologists independently evaluated scar formation at 3 and 6-month follow-ups using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score. RESULT: Twenty-four female patients with cosmetic surgeries were included. The mean VSS score of losartan-treated sides was 7.1 ± 2.06 (at month 3) and 5.21 ± 1.71 (at month 6) that significantly were different from placebo-treated sides (9.77 ± 1.55 and 8.31 ± 1.88 at 3 and 6 months, respectively) (P value < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively, for months 3 and 6). The subset analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in height (P value < 0.001 at 3 and 6 months), pliability (P value < 0.001 at 3 and 6 months), and vascularity (P value < 0.001 at 3 and 6 months) subsets at losartan compared to placebo-treated side. Losartan ointment was well tolerated with no complication. CONCLUSION: Losartan ointment successfully improved scar formation in mammoplasty and abdominoplasty patients. The losartan preventive effect should be confirmed in future large-scale studies with long-term follow-ups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparison of the Effect of Injectable Tranexamic Acid and Inhaled Desmopressin in Controlling Bleeding and Ecchymosis in Open Rhinoplasty.

Background: Bleeding during rhinoplasty surgery has a negative effect on the quality of surgery; so, it is important to reduce bleeding during rhinoplasty. We aimed to evaluate the effect of injectable tranexamic acid (TXA) and nasal spray of desmopressin (DDAVP) on reduction in intraoperative bleeding and ecchymosis after open rhinoplasty. Methods: In a Randomized Clinical Trial ( RCT) prepared since 2020 to 2021 in Razi Hospital and Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran on 42 patients who underwent open rhinoplasty were divided into three groups. In the first group, TXA was injected one hour before surgery at a dose of 10 mg / kg with a placebo inhalation spray. In the second group, DDAVP was administered as a nasal spray at a dose of 40 mcg with a placebo injection. The third group received a placebo spray and placebo injection. All required data were gathered and analyzed. Results: In TXA group and DDAVP groups, the volume of bleeding during surgery significantly (P=0.022) decreased compared to placebo group, also, the quality of the surgical field and the surgeon's satisfaction significantly (P=0.007) improved compared to the placebo group but not with each other. Unlike placebo group, there were no reports of postoperative bleeding in the TXA and DDAVP groups. Duration of surgery, ecchymosis on the day after surgery and coagulation tests before and after surgery were not significantly different in three groups. Conclusion: Use of DDAVP and TXA can both reduce the amount of bleeding during surgery and postoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty and improve the quality of the surgical field and the surgeon 's satisfaction during surgery.

Treatment of Brachial Plexus Injury Following Transaxillary Thyroidectomy.

Minimally invasive surgeries are widespread and technically enhancing. Thyroidectomy is a common surgery and non-invasive adjustments make it more interesting. Neighbor neurovascular bundles need to be protected during minimally invasive thyroidectomy. A 15 yr old female who underwent minimally invasive thyroidectomy due to nodule, had presented with upper brachial plexus injury, without proper recovery despite physiotherapy cessions. She was operated in 2 stage reconstructive surgeries. First, musculocutaneous nerve innervated by 2 branches of median and ulnar nerves. Then, in a compound operation, axillary nerve innervated by long head branch of triceps nerve and suprascapular nerve by accessory nerve. She gained good function of upper limb. Minimally invasive operations in head and neck area can be disastrous, if surgeons do not consider anatomical points. Brachial plexus reconstructive surgeries are complicated operations to preserve hand functions following iatrogenic injuries.

Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of single-dose spinal versus epidural analgesia for labor pain to verify if applying a single dose spinal analgesia is an efficient technique for labor pain management as an alternative for epidural analgesia. METHODS: A total of 128 women in the active phase of labor were randomly allocated into two groups of spinal analgesia (n = 64) and epidural analgesia (n = 64). The latter received a bolus dose of 16 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine and 50 µg fentanyl and repeated 5 - 10 mL of bolus dose. The former received 2.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 50µg fentanyl. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The duration of analgesia, mode of delivery, the duration of labor, side effects, and maternal satisfaction were also compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rate of cesarean section, duration of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, and the frequency of the fetal heart deceleration until 30 min after analgesia between the two groups. Measured pain after 30 (P = 0.0001) and 90 min (P = 0.01) was significantly lower in the spinal group than the epidural group. However, there was no significant difference between the spinal and epidural groups concerning the VAS scores at 150, 210, and 270 minutes. Maternal satisfaction was higher in the spinal group (P = 0.002). The mean duration of analgesia was longer in the spinal group than the epidural group (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings, single-dose spinal analgesia, compared to epidural analgesia, is a safe, fast, and efficient technique for labor analgesia, which can be easily performed. In addition, it provides a high satisfaction level in the parturient.

Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes After Open Rhinoplasty: A Quasi-experimental Study by the Aid of ROE and RHINO Questionnaires.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rhinoplasty is one of the common plastic surgery procedures which has a high rate in Iran. There are several tools for assessing the outcomes and quality of life after this surgical procedure which rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire and rhinoplasty health inventory and nasal outcomes are two of them. The aim of this study was to investigate the aesthetic and functional outcomes of rhinoplasty by the aid of ROE and RHINO scales in patients who presented to a referral center in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, quasi-experimental study was performed on patients who referred to the plastic surgery clinic of Imam Khomeini hospital complex during 2017 to 2019 and underwent open rhinoplasty. ROE and RHINO questionnaires were filled by patients before and 6 months after the surgery. Surgical outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction rate were evaluated in different age groups, genders and educational levels. The data were analyzed by version 21 of SPSS software. RESULTS: ROE score increased from 51.27 ± 10.54 to 79.6 ± 9.67 (P < 0.001). In addition, RHINO score increased from 64.13 ± 11.43 to 83.36 ± 11.03 (P < 0.001). The most common satisfaction factors among patients in this study were "nose feels more natural" in 62% of patients and "tip rotation is good" in 32% of patients. Furthermore, the most common causes of dissatisfaction in patients were "nose too wide" in 25% of patients and "tip bulbous" in 25% of patients. CONCLUSION: ROE and RHINO scales are effective for assessing rhinoplasty outcomes. The satisfaction rate of rhinoplasty is high in Iran and is related to the natural shape of the nose in addition to the tip rotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of topical sirolimus 0.2% cream as adjuvant therapy with pulsed dye laser for the treatment of port wine stain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Port Wine Stain (PWS) is a congenital capillary malformation. Although multiple treatments are required, the gold standard treatment for PWS is Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL). Given its anti-angiogenic effects, sirolimus can be considered as an adjuvant to PDL in PWS. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical sirolimus (Rapamycin) 0.2% cream as adjuvant therapy for PDL for PWS. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 15 patients with PWS were enrolled. Each lesion was divided into upper and lower parts, and each part was assigned randomly to receive PDL (4 sessions, 2 months apart) plus sirolimus vs PDL and placebo. The response was evaluated using colorimetry, investigator global assessment (IGA), and patient global assessment (PGA) every two months for eight continuous months. RESULTS: According to the colorimetric analysis, medial and lateral sides of the treatment and placebo parts did not differ significantly (both P-value > .05). However, according to PGA and IGA, there was a significant difference in favor of sirolimus (P-values = .041 and .039, respectively). Itching and dryness (86.7%), contact dermatitis (20%) were the most common adverse effects in the sirolimus group, while none of them were observed in placebo. CONCLUSION: Although the improvement was significant subjectively, topical sirolimus 0.2% as an adjuvant to PDL does not appear to improve PWS erythema using calorimetric assessment.

Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Mammoplasty and Abdominoplasty Scar Management: A Split-Scar Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Scars are inevitable results of surgical procedures, and prevention of them is still a major problem in the field of cosmetic surgery. Although various studies have been performed on botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injection for the prevention of hypertrophic scars, the exact mechanism remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized study was performed on 19 patients who underwent mammoplasty and abdominoplasty surgery in Razi Hospital from October 2018 to December 2019. Single session of treatment was performed, where XEOMIN was allocated to one half of the scar and 0.9% saline to the control half. 3 and 6 months later, scars were assessed using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). RESULTS: In total, 19 patients who completed the study were analyzed. mSBSES at the third month (P value < 0.001; 3.34 ± 1.59 vs 1.5 ± 1.36) and the sixth month (P value < 0.001; 4.89 ± 1.83 vs 2.39 ± 1.82) showed a significant difference between the treatment and control groups. In the subset analysis, there was significant difference between BoNT-A and control in all four items including width, height, color, and scar visibility at months 3 and 6, and the BoNT-A-treated sides had higher scores in all items. CONCLUSION: BoNT-A has a significant effect on scar prevention due to mammoplasty and abdominoplasty compared to placebo and results in decreased erythema, height, width and reduces incision line visibility. Moreover, its effect increases significantly over time from months 3 to 6. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Decreased Sox2 Messenger RNA Expression in Basal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sox2, zeb1, and p21 have been implicated in aggressive behavior of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma. However, their expression level in basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has not been elucidated. We hypothesized BCC, contrary to SCC, and melanoma, could be a suitable model to study mechanisms which attenuate tumor metastasis. The aim of this study was to examine the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of sox2, zeb1, and p21 in BCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven nonmetastatic BCC and twelve normal skin samples were evaluated using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The stemness marker sox2 demonstrated marked down-regulation, but zeb1 and p21 showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we report a negative association between sox2 mRNA expression level and nonmetastatic BCC, thus, providing a likely explanation for the fact that normal skin is more reliant on sox2 than BCC. BCC may be using decreased sox2 mRNA to remain incognito from metastatic potential.

Efficacy of a Natural Topical Skin Ointment for Managing Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Pilot Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new topical skin ointment with natural ingredients (aloe vera, honey, and peppermint) for dressing skin graft donor sites. DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Researchers enrolled patients who were referred for split-thickness skin graft after burns or surgical wounds on the scalp or face area. For each patient, a thin layer of skin (depth, 0.04 mm; approximate size, less than 15 × 7 cm) was harvested from the thigh by a plastic surgeon with an electric or manual dermatome. The donor sites were divided and randomized to receive either natural ointment or petroleum jelly as a topical agent to dressing. Topical agents were applied on donor site wounds on days 0, 4, 7, and 14. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Wound size, pain, erythema, pruritus, patient discomfort, complications, and physician satisfaction were evaluated at each visit. MAIN RESULTS: Among 28 patients, there was no significant difference between the two treatment agents regarding the rate of wound healing (P = .415), pain (P = .081), pruritus (P = .527), and patient discomfort (P = .616). The ointment was superior to petroleum jelly in reducing wound erythema (P = .001) and was associated with significantly better treatment satisfaction (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The natural topical ointment investigated in this study may be an acceptable alternative to petroleum jelly in caring for split-thickness donor skin graft donor site wounds to effectively promote wound healing, prevent infection and scarring, reduce pain, and comfort the patient.

Reconstruction following Excision of Malignant Scalp Tumors with Split Thickness Skin Graft with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are the most common malignancies, which occur on the scalp. There are various therapeutic methods for managing these malignancies in which the standard treatment method of both is surgical excision with a good margin. Sometimes, the patients need full-thickness excision due to the deep invasion, so exposing the underlying calvarium may be a challenge for surgeons. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the outcomes of using the combined therapy of acellular dermal matrix and split-thickness skin graft (STSG) in comparison with using only STSG in the treatment of defects caused by the excision of scalp malignant tumors among the patients who attended Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex and Razi Hospital of Tehran, Iran. We also evaluated the satisfaction of both surgeons and patients among these two methods of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the candidates were divided into the two groups, that is, of case and control, randomly. The case group underwent the treatment using acellular dermal matrix and STSG, whereas the control group underwent the treatment by only STSG on the wound. In both groups, BCC and SCC were excised with a margin of 6 and 10 mm, respectively, on the skull bone. Then, a layer of bone was removed by osteotomy in order to reach the bleeding points. All patients were followed up for 7, 30, and 90 days after the surgery, and the results were recorded. RESULTS: A significant difference in Manchester Scar Scale, wound contour formation, the mobility of the repair site, and patients and surgeon satisfaction was observed among both groups based on visual analog scale. We found better outcomes in the case group, especially in wound contour formation during 90 days of follow-up. However, the satisfaction of both surgeons and patients was achieved in the case group. Satisfaction of surgeons was achieved in the case group with a relative superiority to the control group according to the Manchester Scar Scale.

The Comparison of Infusion of Two Different Sedation Regimens with Propofol and Ketamine Combination During Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Anesthetic agents are often combined to enhance their therapeutic effects while minimizing adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different sedation regimens of ketamine and propofol combination via infusion on perioperative variables in patients who underwent plastic and reconstructive surgery. METHODS: This randomized double-blind clinical trial was done on 80 patients who were randomized to two groups; group 1 (n = 40) received a 2:1 mixture of 9 mg/ml propofol and 4.5 mg/ml ketamine, and group 2 (n = 40) received a 4:1 mixture of 9 mg/ml propofol and 2.25 mg/ml ketamine. After premedication and before local anesthetic injection, the infusion of mixtures was adjusted to attain the Ramsay sedation scores of 5 in both groups. We recorded induction time, sedation efficacy, cardiovascular and respiratory events, recovery time, and incidence of adverse events during and after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean of volume infusion of mixtures in the beginning of the procedure was higher in group 2 (3.2 ± 1. 2 ml) than in group 1 (2.4 ± 0.8 ml) (p < 0.001). The induction time for sedation was 2.8 ± 0.8 min and 2.6 ± 0.4 min in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = 0. 92). The number of oversedated patients was greater in group 2 compared to group 1 but not statistically significant (p = 0. 80). The sedation efficacy was similar between the two groups. The hemodynamic changes during the procedure were greater in group 2 compared to group 1 (p = 0. 001). The recovery time was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.43). The mean pain score in the recovery room was lower in group 1 than group 2 (1.2 ± 0.8 vs 2.8 ± 1.8, p = 0. 01). Moreover, 4 (10 %) patients in group 1 and 10 (25 %) patients in group 2 needed opioid administration (p = 0. 02). Other postoperative adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of a 2:1 combination of propofol-ketamine, because it reduced the rescue propofol requirement and consequently produced lower cardiovascular and respiratory depression effects and also less postoperative pain.

Subarachnoid block with low dose of bupivacaine and sufentanil in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid block with local anesthetics and opioids enable efficacious spinal anesthesia because of their synergistic effect and permit the use of low-dose local anesthetics, which results in a stable hemodynamic state. The purpose of this study was to describe the cardiovascular effects of spinal anesthesia with low-dose bupivacaine and sufentanil on patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial. A total of 18 patients who had known coronary artery disease were enrolled. Our subjects underwent spinal block for lower limb surgery with 7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 5 µg sufentanil. Complications related to anesthesia such as hypotension, bradycardia, vasopressor need, and blood or volume use were recorded. RESULTS: The average mean arterial pressure decreased 15% in the first 15 min of spinal block in our cases. No patients presented with hypotension and the subjects were without complaints during the spinal anesthesia. All patients remained alert, and no ST segment changes were observed intraoperatively and until 6 h after the operation. Baseline ejection fraction (EF) 40% or less was observed in 10 patients and these subjects were compared with other patients. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate decreased during the first 15 min in response to spinal anesthesia in both groups of patients, but decreased more significantly in patients with EF > 40%. CONCLUSION: We recommend spinal block with low-dose bupivacaine and sufentanil in patients with coronary artery disease and especially in patients with low EF.