The effects of raspberry consumption on lipid profile and blood pressure in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Research into the effects of raspberry on blood pressure and lipid profiles is inconclusive. This meta-analysis was aimed to determine whether raspberry has beneficial effects in clinical practice and to what extent these effects are associated with blood pressure and lipid profiles. A systematic literature search up to September 2023 was completed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify eligible RCTs. Heterogeneity tests of the selected trials were performed using the I 2 statistic. Random effects models were evaluated based on the heterogeneity tests, and pooled data were determined as weighted mean differences with a 95% confidence interval. Eleven randomized controlled trials (with 13 arms) were eligible for this meta-analysis. Our findings revealed that Raspberry consumption had no significant effects on the blood pressure and lipid profile markers, including systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD, -0.37 mm Hg; 95%CI: -2.19 to 1.44; p = .68), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD, -2.14 mm Hg; 95%CI: -4.27 to 0.00; p = .05), total cholesterol (TC) (WMD, -6.83 mg/dL; 95%CI: -15.11 to 1.44; p = .10), triglycerides (TG) (WMD, -5.19 mg/dL: 95%CI: -11.76 to 1.37; p = .12), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD, -5.19 mg/dL; 95%CI: -11.58 to 1.18; p = .11), and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (WMD, 0.82 mg/dL; 95%CI: -1.67 to 3.32; p = .51), compared to control groups. Subgroup analysis showed that raspberry consumption significantly decreased total cholesterol and LDL-C levels in people with elevated TC levels, metabolic syndrome, and andropause symptoms, as well as those older than 35, while the consumption of raspberries led to a significant increase in HDL-C levels in females, obese, under 35, and healthy individuals. Raspberry can improve lipid profile and blood pressure, but it is important to keep in mind that further research is necessary to fully understand the exact mechanism of action and a definite conclusion in this regard.

The effect of Spirulina supplementation on lipid profile: GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the most important causes of death worldwide. Dyslipidemia is one of the main causal risk factors for CVD that can be controlled by modifying lifestyle, which entails the use of healthy diets containing functional foods. The present study was conducted to summarize the effects of Spirulina on the lipid profile in previous randomized controlled trials. METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically until January 2023, for clinical interventions that investigated the effect of Spirulina supplementation on plasma lipid profile concentrations. RESULTS: ooled results of 20 studies (with 23 arms and 1076 participants) indicated that Spirulina intervention significantly reduced LDL-C (SMD: -0.6, 95% CI: -0.9, -0.2, P<0.05), TC (SMD: -0.6, 95% CI: -0.9, -0.2, P<0.05) and TG (SMD: -0.6, 95% CI: -0.9, -0.2, P<0.05) levels while HDL-C levels were significantly increased (SMD: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.0, 0.6, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present meta-analysis and review show the usefulness of supplementing with Spirulina in improving serum levels of TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C.

Impact of synbiotic supplementation on cardiometabolic and anthropometric indices in patients with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Probiotic and synbiotic products are being widely used by a large number of patients and clinicians; however, effects on cardiometabolic indices in patients with the metabolic syndrome remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of a synbiotic intervention on lipid profile, insulin resistance, blood pressure, anthropometric parameters, and inflammatory markers. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Clarivate Analytics Web of Science by October 2021. Studies were selected if they reported the effectiveness of the synbiotic intervention on cardiometabolic and anthropometric indices. The weighted mean difference was calculated as the effect size using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine sources of heterogeneity. Dose-dependent effects were assessed using a dose-response meta-analysis of differences in means. RESULTS: Five trials (1049 participants) were finally included in the meta-analysis. Synbiotic intervention significantly reduced serum insulin levels (WMD, -6.39 µU/mL; 95%CI, (-7.2 to -5.4); p = 0.001, I2 = 88.2%, N = 5), triglycerides (WMD, -20.3 mg/dl; 95%CI, (-32.7 to -7.8); p = 0.001, I2 = 87.7, N = 5), total cholesterol (WMD, -7.8 mg/dl; 95%CI, ( -12.5 to -3.02); p = 0.001; I2 = 66.7%, N = 5), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD, -9.02 mg/dl; 95%CI, (-10.8 to -7.2); p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, N = 5), waist circumference (WMD, -4.04 cm; 95%CI, ( -4.9 to -3.08), p < 0.001; I2 = 22.7%, N = 3), body weight (WMD, -4.3 kg; 95%CI, (-6.2 to -2.5); p = 0.001; I2 = 0%, N = 2), systolic blood pressure (WMD, -1.8 mmHg; 95% CI, (-2.8 to -0.7); p = 0.001; I2 = 0%, N = 3), and serum interleukin-6 concentrations (WMD, -0.2 pg/mL; 95%CI, (-0.3 to -0.08); p = 0.001, I2 = 39.8%, N = 2), and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (WMD, 2.3 mg/dl; 95%CI, (0.2-4.4); p = 0.03; 03; I2 = 93.1%, N = 5). Synbiotic administration did not significantly affect fasting plasma glucose, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and serum C-reactive protein concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that synbiotic intervention effectively improves cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with metabolic syndrome.