Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 11(3): 354-386, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994718

RESUMO

Renal dysfunction is very common among patients with chronic liver disease, and concomitant liver disease can occur among patients with chronic kidney disease. The spectrum of clinical presentation and underlying etiology is wide when concomitant kidney and liver disease occur in the same patient. Management of these patients with dual onslaught is challenging and requires a team approach of hepatologists and nephrologists. No recent guidelines exist on algorithmic approach toward diagnosis and management of these challenging patients. The Indian National Association for Study of Liver (INASL) in association with Indian Society of Nephrology (ISN) endeavored to develop joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of patients who have simultaneous liver and kidney disease. For generating these guidelines, an INASL-ISN Taskforce was constituted, which had members from both the societies. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of simultaneous liver and kidney diseases, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A round-table meeting of the Taskforce was held on 20-21 October 2018 at New Delhi to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong and weak) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (I, II, III). We present here the INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease.

2.
Saudi J Gastroenterol ; 27(3): 136-143, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33642357

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Drotaverine and Mebeverine are used for alleviating the pain of IBS, but the evidence for their efficacy is scarce. In this randomised control study, we evaluated and compared their efficacy in improving severity, frequency of pain and its associated symptoms. METHODS: Patients fulfilling the ROME III criteria of IBS were evaluated in this randomised control trial during 4 weeks of treatment. Group A (n = 100) received 80 mg Drotaverine and Group B (n = 100) received 135 mg Mebeverine three times a day, 1 hour before meals. Primary outcome measure was, the reduction in severity of pain (>30% reduction) assessed by VAS (0 to 10 scale) & PSS (patient symptoms scores). RESULTS: The pain severity score fell from 6.02 to 4.8 on day 3 in Group A as compared to decrease from 6.72 to 6.62 in Group B (p < 0.01). This significant reduction in pain severity was observed till the end of the study, reducing from 6.02 to 1.78 (74% reduction) in Group A compared to 6.72 to 3.62 (46.1% reduction) in Group B (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in pain frequency, straining on stool, a change in one score in Bristol stool chart (BSC), achievement of complete spontaneous smooth bowel movement in Group A, compared to Group B patients. A significant improvement in Patient's evaluation of Global Assessment of Symptoms (p < 0.05) and Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality Of Life (PAC-QOL) (p < 0.01) was observed in Group A compared to Group B. CONCLUSION: Drotaverine was significantly superior in efficacy as compared to Mebeverine in alleviating pain severity (starting from day 3), frequency and stools-elated symptoms of IBS.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Intestino Irritável , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/tratamento farmacológico , Papaverina/análogos & derivados , Fenetilaminas/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 9(4): 476-483, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31516264

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study aimed at assessing the prevalence and clinical profile of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) in patients with cirrhosis using neuropsychological assessment and at understanding the management practices of MHE in the Indian clinical setting. METHODS: This cross-sectional, clinicoepidemiological study conducted at 20 sites enrolled liver cirrhosis patients with Grade 0 hepatic encephalopathy according to West-Haven Criteria. Patients were subjected to mini-mental state examination and those with a score of ≥24 were assessed using psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score. Short Form-36 questionnaire was administered to assess the impact on health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 1260 enrolled patients, 1114 were included in the analysis. The mean age was 49.5 years and majority were males (901 [81%]). The prevalence of MHE was found to be 59.7% (665/1114) based on the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score of ≤-5. Alcohol-related liver disease was the most common etiology (482 [43.27%]) followed by viral infection (239 [21.45%]). Past smokers as well as those currently smoking were more likely to have MHE than nonsmokers. A significant association was found between tobacco chewing, smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, and the presence of MHE. Multivariable analysis revealed smoking as the only parameter associated with MHE. A total of 300 (26.9%) patients were on prophylaxis with lactulose/lactitol or rifaximin. These patients were less likely to have MHE as compared to those not on prophylaxis (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.88; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The disease burden of MHE is quite substantial in patients with cirrhosis with no apparent cognitive defect. Smoking, whether past or current, has significant association with the presence of MHE. Although MHE has been shown to adversely affect quality of life, prophylaxis for MHE is not routinely practiced in the Indian setting.The study has been registered under clinical trials registry of India (CTRI/2014/01/004306).

4.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 9(3): 383-406, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31360030

RESUMO

Liver diseases occurring during pregnancy can be serious and can progress rapidly, affecting outcomes for both the mother and fetus. They are a common cause of concern to an obstetrician and an important reason for referral to a hepatologist, gastroenterologist, or physician. Liver diseases during pregnancy can be divided into disorders unique to pregnancy, those coincidental with pregnancy, and preexisting liver diseases exacerbated by pregnancy. A rapid differential diagnosis between liver diseases related or unrelated to pregnancy is required so that specialist and urgent management of these conditions can be carried out. Specific Indian guidelines for the management of these patients are lacking. The Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver (INASL) in association with the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) had set up a taskforce for development of consensus guidelines for management of patients with liver diseases during pregnancy, relevant to India. For development of these guidelines, a two-day roundtable meeting was held on 26-27 May 2018 in New Delhi, to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. Only those statements that were unanimously approved by most members of the taskforce were accepted. The primary objective of this review is to present the consensus statements approved jointly by the INASL and FOGSI for diagnosing and managing pregnant women with liver diseases. This article provides an overview of liver diseases occurring in pregnancy, an update on the key mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis, and the recommended treatment options.

5.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 8(1): 58-80, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29743798

RESUMO

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure in India. There are no Indian consensus guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and management of HBV infection. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) set up a taskforce on HBV in 2016, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of HBV infection, relevant to disease patterns and clinical practices in India. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of HBV management, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A 2-day round table discussion was held on 11th and 12th February 2017 at Port Blair, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The members of the taskforce reviewed and discussed the existing literature threadbare at this meeting and formulated the 'INASL position statements' on each of the issues. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong: 1, weak: 2) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (A, B, C, D). We present here the INASL position statements on prevention, diagnosis and management of HBV in India.

6.
Saudi J Gastroenterol ; 20(6): 378-82, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25434320

RESUMO

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: To study the efficacy and safety of drotaverine hydrochloride (HCl) 80 mg tablet given thrice a day in the symptomatic relief of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study performed at three centers. The patients who fulfilled Rome II Criteria of IBS were included in the study. A total of 180 patients with IBS were randomized to drotaverine and placebo treatment groups. Abdominal pain and stool frequency were measured every week in both the groups for all the 4 weeks of treatment duration. Subject Global Assessment of Relief (SGA) of IBS symptoms was assessed at the end of the study. Appropriate statistical analysis was done using SPSS software. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mann-Whitney U-test (two-tailed), Wilcoxon signed ranks test, and McNemar tests. RESULTS: Pain frequency decreased significantly (P < 0.01) in 22 (25.9%), 51 (60%), and 66 (77.7%) patients in the drotaverine group, at the end of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th weeks, respectively, as compared with 8 (9.4%), 18 (21.2%), and 26 (30.6%) in the placebo group. Pain severity scores also decreased significantly in the drotaverine group 66 (77.7%) as compared with placebo 26 (30.6%) after 4 weeks. Drotaverine HCl was shown to provide significant improvement (P < 0.01) in global relief in abdominal pain as perceived by the patient (85.9% vs 39.5%) and the clinician (82.4% vs 36.5%) in the drotaverine group as compared with placebo. There is significant (P < 0.01) improvement in stool frequency in drotaverine HCl treatment group as compared with placebo. The drug is well tolerated without any major side effects. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-week treatment with drotaverine significantly improves abdominal symptoms in patients with IBS.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/tratamento farmacológico , Papaverina/análogos & derivados , Administração Oral , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papaverina/administração & dosagem , Parassimpatolíticos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Virol J ; 7: 213, 2010 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20815928

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding duration of fecal excretion and viremia on sequential samples from individual patients and its correlation with serum transaminases and antibody responses in patients with acute hepatitis E. This prospective study was undertaken at a tertiary care center in Northern India over 15 months. Only those patients of sporadic acute hepatitis E who were in their first week of illness and followed up weekly for liver function tests, IgM anti HEV antibody and HEV RNA in sera and stool were included. HEV RNA was done by RT - nPCR using two pairs of primers from RdRp region of ORF 1 of the HEV genome. RESULTS: Over a period of 15 months 60 patients met the inclusion criterion and were enrolled for the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 29.2 ± 8.92 years, there were 39 males. The positivity of IgM anti HEV was 80% at diagnosis and 18.3% at 7th week, HEV RNA 85% at diagnosis and 6.6% at 7th week and fecal RNA 70% at the time of diagnosis and 20% at 4th week. The maximum duration of viremia detected was 42 days and fecal viral shedding was 28 days after the onset of illness. CONCLUSION: Present study reported HEV RNA positivity in sera after normalization of transaminases. Fecal shedding was not seen beyond normalization of transaminases. However, viremia lasted beyond normalization of transaminases suggesting that liver injury is independent of viral replication.


Assuntos
Fezes/virologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite/sangue , Hepatite E/imunologia , Hepatite E/virologia , Transaminases/sangue , Viremia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Índia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral/sangue , Estatística como Assunto , Carga Viral , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 25(6): 1029-41, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20594216

RESUMO

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a major complication that develops in some form and at some stage in a majority of patients with liver cirrhosis. Overt HE occurs in approximately 30-45% of cirrhotic patients. Minimal HE (MHE), the mildest form of HE, is characterized by subtle motor and cognitive deficits and impairs health-related quality of life. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) set up a Working Party on MHE in 2008 with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of MHE relevant to clinical practice. Questions related to the definition of MHE, its prevalence, diagnosis, clinical characteristics, pathogenesis, natural history and treatment were addressed by the members of the Working Party.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Encefalopatia Hepática , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Sociedades Médicas , Algoritmos , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Progressão da Doença , Encefalopatia Hepática/epidemiologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/etiologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/terapia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 62(3): 427-31, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16111963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic balloon dilation is the most effective nonsurgical treatment to relieve functional obstruction of the gastroesophageal junction in achalasia. Since its inception, the conventional technique has been performed under direct fluoroscopic control with or without a guidewire. To overcome the impediments of the conventional technique and radiation exposure, we have devised a novel technique of achalasia dilation without fluoroscopy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy, the safety, and the outcome of the new method. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (34 men, 22 women) (mean age 32 years) with achalasia cardia were subjected, over a span of 2 years, to dilation with a Gruntzig-type (Rigiflex balloon) pneumatic dilator with the new technique. Clinical response and complications were assessed. OBSERVATIONS: Excellent improvement in dysphagia, pain, and regurgitation was observed in 92.9%, 89.3%, and 89.3% patients at 24 hours, 6 weeks, and 6 months after dilation, respectively. The mean time to maneuver the Rigiflex balloon to the antrum was 30 seconds. The procedure was successfully done in all patients, and there were no procedural failures. The mean time of the procedure was 8 minutes. There were no complications or mortality during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Achalasia dilation with this new technique has excellent results and is devoid of the side effects of radiation. It can be done as an office procedure, without the need of a fluoroscopy setup.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/instrumentação , Cateterismo/métodos , Acalasia Esofágica/diagnóstico , Acalasia Esofágica/terapia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Esofagoscópios , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...