Competition for patchy soil resources reduces community evenness.

The presence of small-scale patches of soil resources has been predicted to increase competition, because multiple species will proliferate roots in the same small area, and therefore decrease plant diversity. I tested whether such patches reduced species evenness in a community of four old-field species, both with and without interspecific interactions. In species mixtures, patches reduced evenness, while in "communities" constructed via combined monocultures, in which species did not compete, patches increased evenness. Therefore, the reduction in evenness in response to patches was due to changes in competition. Community-level changes may be attributable to plant foraging traits-in species with low foraging precision, competition reduced abundance much more in patchy soils than in even soils, while in species with high root foraging precision, the effect of competition was similar in patchy and even soils.

Root foraging traits and competitive ability in heterogeneous soils.

The responses of plant roots to nutrient patches in soil may be an important component of competitive ability. In particular, the scale, precision, and rate of foraging for patchy soil resources may influence competitive ability in heterogeneous soils. In a target-neighbor experiment in the field, per-individual and per-gram competitive effects were measured for six old-field species with known root foraging scale, precision, and rate. The presence and number of nutrient patches were also manipulated in a full factorial design. Number and presence of patches did not influence the outcome of competition. Competitive ability was not related to total plant size, growth rate, or root:shoot allocation, or to root foraging precision. Per-individual competitive effects were marginally correlated with root foraging scale (biomass of roots) and root foraging rate (time required to reach a patch). Therefore, competitive ability was more closely related to ability to quickly fill a soil volume with roots than to ability to preempt resource-rich patches.

Quantitative partitioning of regional and local processes shaping regional diversity patterns.

Much recent research explaining plant community diversity has focused on comparing the relative impacts of regional and local processes. We employed a novel analysis to quantify the effects of multiple regional and local processes on species richness, and to make quantitative comparisons of those effects across two sites that differ in plot-level species richness, productivity and environmental conditions. While abiotic stress and competition limited richness within the communities at both sites, only differences in the overall pool of species at the site, likely resulting from long-distance dispersal and climate fluctuations, explained the differences in plot-level richness between sites. Patterns in local richness may be driven by a temporal storage effect, with greater richness in the site with greater climatic variability. By identifying both the factors that impact diversity within communities and those that vary systematically across communities, our integrated approach provides a better understanding of regional diversity patterns.

Root foraging for patchy resources in eight herbaceous plant species.

The root foraging strategy of a plant species can be characterized by measuring foraging scale, precision, and rate. Trade-offs among these traits have been predicted to contribute to coexistence of competitors. We tested for trade-offs among root foraging scale (total root mass and length of structural roots), precision (ln-ratio of root lengths in resource-rich and resource-poor patches), and rate (days required for roots to reach a resource-rich patch, or growth rate of roots within a resource-rich patch) in eight co-occurring species. We found that root foraging scale and precision were positively correlated, as were foraging scale and the rate of reaching patches. High relative growth rate of a species did not contribute to greater scale, precision, or rate of root foraging. Introduced species had greater foraging scale, precision, and rate than native species. The positive correlations between foraging scale and foraging precision and rate may give larger species a disproportionate advantage in competition for patchy soil resources, leading to size asymmetric competition below ground.