Unilateral blindness secondary to acute sphenoid sinusitis.

OBJECTIVES: To highlight a rare scenario where a delay in diagnosis caused unilateral blindness. CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old Aboriginal woman with a history of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma presented with a severe left-sided headache, pyrexia and positive blood cultures. Following admission, the patient rapidly developed unilateral blindness, but did not inform her physician until 21 hours after onset. High-resolution CT scanning of the sinuses showed erosion of the bony covering of the optic nerve. Sinus surgery was performed. RESULTS: Despite the discovery of pus under considerable pressure, and clearing the sphenoid sinus of pus and debris, vision was not restored, even at 2-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Two pathological processes are postulated here: that erosion of the bony optic canal allowed the optic nerve to be exposed, allowing the ensuing sinusitis to cause irreversible nerve ischemia, and immunosuppression meant the patient's immune response was inadequate to cope with the sinusitis, with devastating effects.

Role of cognitive function in assessing informed consent for endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Patient understanding of the consent process is often suboptimal and the reasons for this are poorly understood. In particular the role of cognitive function in assessing the level of understanding of consent has not been evaluated. AIMS: This study aims to assess the level of patient understanding of the informed consent process and the role of cognitive function in those with low levels of understanding. METHODS: The study was prospective, interviewing patients immediately after they had given consent but before undergoing their procedure. Understanding of the reason for the procedure, the risks attendant upon it, details of the procedure itself and post procedure care was scored with the total representing overall level of understanding. A mini mental state examination (MMSE) was then performed with the score recorded. RESULTS: 100 patients were interviewed. A low level of understanding was shown in 36%. Ninety two patients had a MMSE score greater than 24. All patients with a high level of understanding had MMSE scores greater then 24 compared with 78% of those with a low level of understanding. All patients (n = 8) who displayed a MMSE score less than 24 had a low level of understanding. Men displayed poorer levels of understanding than women. A subnormal MMSE only identified 22% of those with low levels of understanding. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of the consent process is suboptimal. Adequate cognitive function does not predict a high level of understanding of the informed consent process while cognitive impairment precludes it. It is evident, however that factors other than cognitive dysfunction are at play when attempting to explain low levels of understanding.

The effect of the modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure on the mucociliary clearance of the frontal sinus in an animal model.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of recalcitrant frontal sinus disease has been a dilemma for otolaryngologists for many years. Although the osteoplastic flap with obliteration has been the gold standard of treatment for years, the modified endoscopic Lothrop (MEL) procedure recently has been advocated as an alternative. However, little is known about the effect of this procedure on the mucociliary drainage of the frontal sinuses postoperatively and this animal study addresses this issue. METHODS: Fourteen sheep underwent the MEL procedure. The sheep were randomized regarding the use of postoperative irrigation via minitrephines. Each sheep had a nuclear medicine gamma-scintigraphy frontal sinus clearance study via minitrephines performed on each frontal sinus preoperatively and then 3 months postoperatively. Then, the results of these studies were compared. RESULTS: The scans revealed a trend toward faster clearance times postoperatively. However, this decrease was not statistically significant. Importantly, there was no trend or significant increase in clearance times postoperatively. Also, the use of postoperative irrigation was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward faster clearance times postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The MEL procedure has no adverse effects on the mucociliary clearance of the frontal sinus at 3 months postoperatively. Irrigation of the frontal sinus in the immediate postoperative period showed a trend toward improved postoperative mucociliary function at 3 months.

Frontal ostium neo-osteogenesis and restenosis after modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure in an animal model.

All patients who undergo a modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure have postoperative narrowing of the enlarged frontal ostium. The aim of this study is to evaluate neo-osteogenesis and restenosis of the frontal ostium and its effect on mucociliary clearance. Fourteen sheep underwent an endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure. Pre- and postoperative nuclear medicine gamma scintigraphy of the frontal sinuses was performed. The sizes of the frontal ostia were measured and biopsies taken from the bone of the frontal ostium. Histological evidence of new bone formation was found in 56% of biopsies. The average preoperative mucociliary clearance half times (T1/2) at 15 and 30 min were 70 and 74 min, respectively, and postoperatively were 50 and 67 min. There was a non-significant trend towards poorer clearance in sinuses with neo-osteogenesis. The average size of the frontal ostium decreased by 28%. There was no relationship between the size of the ostium and neo-osteogenesis. Neo-osteogenesis was seen in 56% of biopsies with a 28% reduction in size of the frontal ostium after 224 days. Mucociliary clearance did not alter significantly.

Scores and grades: a sampling of how college students and food safety professionals interpret restaurant inspection results.

Controversy surrounds the use of posted restaurant inspection scores and grades. There is much debate about how well a score or grade conveys risks to potential diners, and questions remain about how the public interprets posted scores and grades, regardless of how they are derived. To determine how such scores and grades are perceived, the authors surveyed a sample of Maryland college students and food safety professionals about what a posted inspection score of 86 means and what a letter grade of C means. There was no clear consensus about the meaning of the scores and grades described in the surveys. The majority of respondents felt that a restaurant should be either open or closed, and that the public should not have to decipher the meaning of a posted sign. The response of the sample is especially significant given that many respondents claimed that they would not eat at a restaurant with either a posted letter grade of C or a posted score of 86. Although these results do not come from a random sample, they nevertheless suggest that the public has a limited understanding of such signs and, at the same time, bases dining decisions on them. Thus, environmental health professionals must carefully consider how the public can be better educated about signs, how the signs can be less ambiguous, and whether posted restaurant inspection results are even advisable in their current form.

Exfoliative cytology in screening for malignant and premalignant lesions in the buccal mucosa.

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of exfoliative cytology in the detection of oral premalignant and malignant lesions. DESIGN: Cytological diagnosis of lesions of the buccal mucosa assessed using histopathological diagnosis of the same lesions as the gold standard. SUBJECTS: Patients with buccal lesions clinically diagnosed as leukoplakia (n = 91) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 59), and healthy subjects (n = 40) in whom buccal mucosa appeared clinically normal. SETTING: Oral and Maxillo-facial Unit, General Hospital, Kandy and Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya. RESULTS: A sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 100% and accuracy of 92% were obtained for leukoplakia. SCC gave a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Oral exfoliative cytology is a useful method for detecting oral premalignant and malignant lesions. Anucleated squames in a smear is non-diagnostic.