Dental attendance after treatment under dental general analgesia (DGA): a data-based follow-up study.

AIMS: To investigate dental attendance of patients in different age groups after dental general analgesia (DGA) and procedures performed on these patients during the DGA and in dental care after the DGA during the follow-up period of almost 3 years. METHODS: The study population consisted of 66 patients who were treated under DGA at a municipal health centre in Oulu, Finland between September 2010 and June 2011. The electronic patient files of the DGA patients were accessible for data collection for the follow-up period of nearly 3 years. The statistical analyses included Chi square tests and logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: Approximately every sixth (14.9%) dental visit was missed or cancelled and nearly half (43.9%) of the studied subjects had at least one missed or cancelled appointment. The factors increasing the risk of missed or cancelled appointments and dental avoidance were endodontic treatment (OR 3.62), need of more than five dental restorations (OR 3.47), tooth extractions due to caries (OR 2.22), and male gender (OR 1.80). A total of 45.5% of the patients received non-invasive procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who need DGA are evidently risk patients considering dental attendance. Nearly half of the patients in this study had non-attended or cancelled appointments. DGA patients' need of treatment after DGA is extensive, even comparable to the amount of procedures generally performed under DGA. The quality or amount of preventive procedures do not appear to be at the required level to reduce the number of non-attended appointments.

Survey of family-related factors of children treated under dental general anaesthesia.

AIM: Treatment under general anaesthesia (DGA) is a rising trend in Finland. There is a great need to investigate the causes leading to it. Our purpose was to examine family-related factors reported by parents, such as the family size and favoring DGA in the family, and their influence on children being treated under DGA. This survey was based on a questionnaire targeted to parents of children whose dental treatment could not be performed in a conventional setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Guardians of 87 healthy children treated under DGA at a municipal health center in the city of Oulu, Finland, between November 2014 and December 2015 answered the questionnaire on family-related background factors and on the respondent's own as well as their child's presumed dental fear. RESULTS: According to most guardians (83.9% of the cases), the reason for DGA was caries. Male gender, vague family structure, large number of siblings (?4), and DGA history in the family were all important family-related background factors leading to DGA. Self-reported parental dental fear was quite common (25.3%). Children's dental fear reported by parents was associated with DGA in almost half of the cases (46.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The survey highlights the role of the entire family in association with children ending up being treated under DGA. It is essential for the success of dental health care to also consider family-related factors when planning the treatment, particularly with children demanding DGA.

The influence of general health on the need for dental general anaesthesia in children.

AIM: To analyse the occurrence and causes of dental general anaesthesia (DGA) in healthy and medically compromised children, and to investigate if there are differences between those groups considering factors associated with DGA and DGA procedures. METHODS: The data was collected from medical records of children under 7 years of age treated under DGA in the years 2009 and 2010 at the Oulu University Hospital, Finland. The children were divided into two groups: 0-35-month-olds and ≥36-month olds. Background information (year, age, gender, dental diagnosis, health) and the procedures performed were registered. The procedures were analysed considering the child's age and tooth types. RESULTS: The number of children treated under DGA increased between 2009 (58) and 2010 (82), particularly in the group of healthy children. The two main diagnoses leading to DGA were dental caries and dental fear. Dental caries as the first dental diagnosis leading to DGA was more common among the medically compromised children (61.5%) compared to the healthy children (38.6%). The procedures performed were similar among the two groups. However, they varied between the age groups and tooth types and even between upper and lower teeth. The medically compromised children had been treated more frequently under DGA in the past. CONCLUSIONS: The threshold for treating medically compromised children under DGA seems to be lower than for healthy children. However, the occurrence of DGA among healthy children has increased recently. To avoid unnecessary DGA, the control of caries should be carried out according to individual needs and independent of whether the child is healthy or has a chronic disease.

Self-reported causes for referral to dental treatment under general anaesthesia (DGA): a cross-sectional survey.

AIM: To determine causes leading to dental care under general anaesthesia (DGA) in public health care reported by the patients or the parents/caregivers. STUDY DESIGN: All the patients referred to DGA at the Municipal Health Centre, Oulu, Finland, during 10 months were invited to participate in the present cross-sectional survey. They were sent a questionnaire on indications for referral to DGA, dental fear, possible reasons for it as well as prior treatment of dental fear. For measuring overall dental fear, the modified Corah dental anxiety scale (MCDAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) forms were also included in the questionnaire. RESULTS: The most common self-reported indication for referral to DGA was dental fear (63.9%). For children and adolescents (<18 years), need for extensive care was the second most common reported cause. The great majority of the respondents reported having dental fear (90.8%). Dental fear was more common among females than males, but the difference between the genders was not statistically significant. The most common cause for dental fear was earlier negative experiences in dental care (51.9%). The mean MCDAS score was 19.0 (SD 5.7; 5-25) indicating severe dental anxiety. An increasing trend towards older age groups could be seen in VAS scores reporting fear of pain, needles, scaling, scolding by the dentist, extractions, as well as endodontic treatment. Dental fear had been taken into consideration in dental treatment preceding DGA. CONCLUSION: Dental fear is the most common self-reported indication for referral to DGA and should be taken into consideration.

Tooth by tooth survival analysis of dental health in girls with epilepsy.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse, tooth by tooth, the timing of caries attacks leading to dental restoration in girls with epilepsy. STUDY DESIGN: The series comprised 60 girls with epilepsy, 8-18 years old, treated in the Departments of Paediatrics or Neurology of the Oulu University Hospital. A group of healthy age matched girls served as control. METHODS: A tooth by tooth survival analysis of the time between tooth eruption and caries attacks to a stage leading to the restorations of the permanent teeth was conducted retrospectively using data from the dental health records with annual examinations. RESULTS: The rate of dental restorations placed due to caries was constantly higher in the girls with epilepsy than in their controls. STATISTICS: The difference was significant between the first molars (p=<0.03), second molars (p=<0.02) and central incisors (p=<0.02) in the maxilla. CONCLUSION: The present observation supports the hypothesis that factors related to epilepsy, the antiepileptic medication in particular, might increase the risk of caries.