RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the patient and clinical variables associated with administration of any analgesia, nurse-initiated analgesia (NIA, prescribed and administered by a nurse) and early analgesia (within 30â min of presentation). METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented to a metropolitan ED in Melbourne, Australia, during July and August, 2013. The ED has an established NIA programme. Patients were included if they were aged 18â years or more and presented with a painful complaint. The study sample was randomly selected from a list of all eligible patients. Data were extracted electronically from the ED records and by explicit extraction from the medical record. Logistic regression models were constructed to assess associations with the three binary study end points. RESULTS: 1289 patients were enrolled. Patients were less likely to receive any analgesia if they presented 08:00-15:59â hours (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.98) or 16:00-24:00â hours (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.80) were triage category 5 (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.49) or required an interpreter (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.86). Patients were less likely to receive NIA or early analgesia if they were aged 56â years or more (OR 0.70 and 0.63; OR 0.57 and 0.21, respectively) or if they had received ambulance analgesia (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.95; OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.74, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who present during the daytime, have a triage category of 5 or require an interpreter are less likely to receive analgesia. Older patients and those who received ambulance analgesia are less likely to receive NIA or early analgesia.
Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Analgesia/enfermagem , Barreiras de Comunicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/enfermagem , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , TriagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the agreement between the chemical dot NexTemp thermometer with mercury and tympanic thermometers and the repeatability of measurements using these devices. METHODS: A prospective study involving a convenience sample of 194 consenting adult patients presenting to the ED, Freemasons Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. A survey of emergency medical staff was conducted to determine what they considered an acceptable level of agreement and repeatability for a putative new thermometer. The NexTemp thermometer's performance was judged against this. For each thermometer, a set of two temperature measurements was made in every patient. The sequence of the set of readings (and hence device) was random between patients and the staff member performing one set was blinded to the results of the other two sets of readings in each patient. The method of Bland and Altman was used for assessing agreement and repeatability. RESULTS: Clinicians considered that a new thermometer should exhibit repeatability of +/- 0.3 degrees C and agree with existing devices within +/- 0.5 degrees C. The tympanic thermometer had 95% limits of repeatability of -0.8-0.5 degrees C compared with the NexTemp (-0.3-0.4 degrees C) and mercury thermometers (-0.3-0.4 degrees C). The NexTemp thermometer agreed with mercury thermometer within -0.6-0.5 degrees C. The tympanic thermometer agreed with the mercury thermometer within -1.0-1.1 degrees C. CONCLUSION: Based on temperature measurement only, the NexTemp thermometer can be used interchangeably with current mercury and tympanic thermometers.