Maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio distinguishes growth-restricted from non-growth-restricted small-for-gestational-age fetuses.

BACKGROUND: Fetal growth restriction secondary to chronic placental insufficiency is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of fetuses with fetal growth restriction are small for gestational age, defined as a birthweight of ≤10th percentile. However, not all small-for-gestational-age fetuses are growth restricted. Some are constitutionally small and otherwise healthy. It is important to distinguish between small-for-gestational-age fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction to ensure appropriate interventions in small-for-gestational-age fetuses with fetal growth restriction and to minimize unnecessary interventions in healthy small-for-gestational-age fetuses. The maternal serum ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placental growth factor is an indicator of placental insufficiency in the latter half of pregnancy. As such, the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio may be a clinically useful tool to distinguish between small-for-gestational-age fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio can distinguish between small-for-gestational-age fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction with a birthweight of ≤10th percentile. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective audit of 233 singleton pregnancies delivering an infant with a birthweight of ≤10th percentile corrected for gestational age with an antenatal maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor result was performed. Fetal growth restriction was defined as a birthweight of ≤10th percentile with an umbilical artery pulsatility index of >95th percentile, fetal middle cerebral artery pulsatility index of <5th percentile, amniotic fluid index of <6 cm, and/or cerebroplacental ratio of <1st percentile. The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratios before delivery between fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction (121 [fetal growth restriction] vs 112 [no fetal growth restriction]) were compared. The Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare cases and controls. The Mann-Whitney U test, linear regression analysis, and Spearman correlation coefficient (Rho) were used to examine associations between the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio and fetal outcomes to determine whether the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio served as a prognostic marker of fetal growth restriction severity. RESULTS: The mean soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was increased in fetal growth restriction cases compared with non-fetal growth restriction controls (234.3±25.0 vs 67.4±7.7, respectively; P<.0001). When controlling for preeclampsia, which is associated with placental insufficiency, fetal growth restriction cases still demonstrated an independent increase in the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio (effect size, 0.865; 95% confidence interval, 0.509-1.220; P<.001). The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was negatively correlated with birthweight percentiles in pregnancies delivering an infant with a birthweight of ≤10th percentile (r=-0.3565; P<.0001). This association was maintained for fetuses with fetal growth restriction (r=-0.2309; P<.05), whereas fetuses without fetal growth restriction had no significant correlation between the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio and neonatal birthweight percentiles. CONCLUSION: The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was significantly higher in small-for-gestational-age fetuses with fetal growth restriction than small-for-gestational-age fetuses without fetal growth restriction, independent of preeclampsia. Furthermore, the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was negatively correlated with fetal growth restriction birthweight percentiles, suggesting that it may be a clinical measure of fetal growth restriction severity. Therefore, the ratio may usefully delineate fetal growth restriction from constitutionally small but otherwise healthy fetuses antenatally, allowing for timely interventions in small-for-gestational-age cases with fetal growth restriction and unnecessary interventions to be minimized in small-for-gestational-age cases without fetal growth restriction.

Understanding women's views of and preferences for accessing postpartum contraception: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Nearly half of women experience unintended pregnancies. These are associated with increased risk of poor maternal physical and psychosocial health outcomes. Many pregnancies in the first year postpartum are unintended, further increasing risks of poor outcomes and complications. We undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis to evaluate qualitative research on women's views and preferences for accessing postpartum contraception, and identify evidence gaps and opportunities for postpartum contraception provision. METHODS: Five databases were searched to identify relevant qualitative studies. Included studies focused on views of, and preferences for, accessing postpartum contraception for women of reproductive age in high-income countries. RESULTS: Of 1854 studies identified, 28 full texts were assessed and 19 studies included. These were critically appraised using Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) and analysed using thematic synthesis. Included studies indicated the majority of women desire postpartum contraception, but face a range of financial, health system and personal barriers. Women felt unclear about the ideal interpregnancy interval (IPI) and the rationale for this. Women preferred contraceptive counselling at varying times both antenatally and postnatally, and commonly preferred to receive contraception in the immediate postpartum period before hospital discharge. Women commonly saw their obstetrician or general practitioner for contraceptive counselling, but welcomed midwifery involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Most women were interested in postpartum contraception and pregnancy spacing, but felt unclear about the optimal IPI, highlighting the need for further education and support around this issue. Contraceptive counselling was viewed as valuable antenatally and postnatally, and by varying maternal health providers, as was the provision of immediate postpartum contraception.

Epidemiology and clinical features of emergency department patients with suspected COVID-19: Results from the first month of the COVID-19 Emergency Department Quality Improvement Project (COVED-2).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to describe the epidemiological and clinical features of ED patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19. METHODS: The COVID-19 Emergency Department (COVED) Project is an ongoing prospective cohort study that includes all adult patients presenting to The Alfred Hospital ED who undergo testing for SARS-CoV-2. Current guidelines recommend testing for patients with fevers or chills, acute respiratory symptoms or a high-risk exposure history, as well as implementation of infection prevention and control precautions for all suspected and confirmed cases. Study outcomes include a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result and intensive respiratory support. RESULTS: In the period 1-30 April 2020, 702 of 3453 ED patients (20%; 95% CI 19-22) were tested, with a significant increase during the study period (incident rate ratio 1.019; 95% confidence interval 1.017-1.021, P < 0.001). The primary outcome of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was recorded in 14 patients (2%; 95% confidence interval 1-3). Shortness of breath (77%), fatigue (100%), myalgia (67%) and diarrhoea (67%) were common among positive cases, while close contact (9%), fever (0%) and healthcare occupation (0%) were not. No positive cases required intensive respiratory support in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of ED patients with suspected COVID-19 is increasing. Low numbers of positive cases precluded development of accurate predictive tools, but the COVED Project is fulfilling an important role in monitoring the burden of infection prevention and control requirements on the ED. The increasing number of patients meeting isolation criteria has the potential to impact on patient flow and may lead to ED overcrowding.

Epidemiology and clinical features of emergency department patients with suspected COVID-19: Initial results from the COVID-19 Emergency Department Quality Improvement Project (COVED-1).

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 Emergency Department (COVED) Quality Improvement Project aims to provide regular and real-time clinical information to ED clinicians caring for patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19. The present study summarises data from the first 2 weeks of the study. METHODS: COVED is an ongoing prospective cohort study that commenced on 1 April 2020. It includes all adult patients presenting to a participating ED who undergo testing for SARS-CoV-2. Data are collected prospectively and entered into a bespoke registry. Outcomes include a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test result and requirement for intensive respiratory support. RESULTS: In the period 1-14 April 2020, 240 (16%) of 1508 patients presenting to The Alfred Emergency and Trauma Centre met inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 (5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The mean age of patients was 60 years and the commonest symptoms were acute shortness of breath (n = 122 [67%]), cough (n = 108 [56%]) or fever (n = 98 [51%]). Overseas travel or known contact with a confirmed case was reported by 24 (14%) and 16 (10%) patients, respectively. Fever or hypoxia was recorded in 23 (10%) and 11 (5%) patients, respectively. Eleven (5%) patients received mechanical ventilation in the ED, of whom none tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients presenting to a tertiary ED with suspected COVID-19, only a small proportion tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Although the low incidence of positive cases currently precludes the development of predictive tools, the COVED Project demonstrates that the rapid establishment of an agile clinical registry for emergency care is feasible.